Active Users:248 Time:15/04/2025 10:46:45 AM
SEO? Larry Send a noteboard - 04/06/2010 05:31:38 PM
Getting the website out there is something that's being worked on, but SEO is complicated and takes ages.

If you've got any ideas NB them through.


Nah, I'll say this one publicly, since it's really the easiest step of several that can be taken to increase visibility:

There perhaps should be a group blog, where the focus is on posting contributor reviews, snippets of others' reviews and discussions, and all sorts of matters that may be appealing to those who are uncertain about which forum/site would be best. I know Wordpress and I believe Blogger as well have set up mechanisms where such a blog could be integrated seamlessly into the main site.

I originally tried this back in 2004 when I created the OF Blog, but my timing wasn't right; very few "independent" bloggers and no real social infrastructure. Now with Facebook and Twitter (and it would be a good idea to utilize those as well to increase visibility), one can start a blog, meet a few people, add those as "friends" or be a "follower" and a little bit of conversation starts. Information is shared, some increase in traffic occurs to newly-started blog and if that is linked directly to here, some of that traffic will spill over and there might be some uptick in the viewerships and maybe active participation.

But it depends on people who are pro-active and can interact well with others. Nothing easy or quick about meeting others and becoming an influential voice; took me nearly nine years to get to where I am (or maybe 3 years, considering the first six was limited almost strictly to wotmania). But if there were say a group of 5-10 people blogging, with a RAFO Twitter/Facebook name being shared among them all, some sense of identity is created and there wouldn't need to be someone being active 24/7; the burden of evangelizing can be spread out.

So here's a possible model:

1. Create group blog, call it Read and Find Out: The Blog (or something that contains a direct reference to this site). Include a mission statement at the top. Use Wordpress or Blogger for the platform for ease of use.

2. Have it set for 5-10 people, mostly the Admins from the WoT and SF boards.

3. Make near-daily posts, such as copying the contributor's reviews (always important here), commentaries, and provide links to discussions for each of the sections here (I would not emphasize the CMB too much, only to note that there is "an active and vibrant community for discussion of all sorts of matters", in case any get leery of an off-topic board dominating matters)

4. Have a Facebook mirror set up and seek to "friend" several authors, publicists, and bloggers. Then set up a Twitter account for those participating in said blog, again following other bloggers and authors and commenting on occasion.

5. Combination of original content (reviews, commentaries on SF matters, links to other discussions, reviews, etc. both inside and outside RAFO) and interaction with other review sites will generate more visibility without the need for a massive overhauling of the site's looks. Very cheap, too, at $0.00 extra for those participating.


But yeah, it all comes down to people being more active in making content and making that content known to people outside this site.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
RAFO is not your blog. - 01/06/2010 11:50:14 PM 1201 Views
I chipped my nail polish *NM* - 02/06/2010 12:13:59 AM 256 Views
My advice: wipe your behind with less vigor next time. - 02/06/2010 12:15:21 AM 602 Views
Hey! I use corn cobs! - 02/06/2010 12:18:30 AM 632 Views
I don't post about my bum activities, either. - 02/06/2010 12:20:02 AM 589 Views
True...thanks - 02/06/2010 12:23:27 AM 631 Views
blog this *NM* - 02/06/2010 12:15:01 AM 268 Views
"World, I can't wait to tell you!" - 02/06/2010 12:18:22 AM 668 Views
- 02/06/2010 12:28:53 AM 607 Views
Whan Daddy says blog, I blog! - 02/06/2010 12:29:51 AM 697 Views
Re: "World, I can't wait to tell you!" - 02/06/2010 01:06:33 AM 666 Views
yes - 02/06/2010 01:10:05 AM 620 Views
You're even sicker than me! - 02/06/2010 01:14:52 AM 585 Views
He's disgusting - 02/06/2010 01:20:42 AM 592 Views
Oh jesus. I've never heard that phrase before. - 02/06/2010 01:14:02 AM 636 Views
Lies! I refuse to believe you're that innocent. *NM* - 02/06/2010 01:42:08 AM 349 Views
I like some kinky as hell stuff, ain't gonna lie about that. - 02/06/2010 01:49:56 AM 618 Views
Ironically, this reminds me of a classic TFLN: - 02/06/2010 02:29:32 AM 586 Views
but noone responds to my facebook posts - 02/06/2010 12:23:02 AM 595 Views
But to follow you on Twitter or Facebook, I have to choose to do so. - 02/06/2010 12:28:42 AM 773 Views
Re: But to follow you on Twitter or Facebook, I have to choose to do so. - 02/06/2010 12:37:56 AM 732 Views
Also keep in mind - 02/06/2010 01:03:22 AM 775 Views
At what point does visiting this website become the internet version of necrophilia? - 02/06/2010 01:56:43 AM 661 Views
Heh. - 02/06/2010 01:59:13 AM 619 Views
The solution is at our fingertips. - 02/06/2010 02:19:13 AM 818 Views
The biggest flaw is that Ben kept the divisions that Mike used to kill his own website. - 02/06/2010 02:01:10 PM 707 Views
I understand the desire to have some boards separate from others, but I agree with you. - 02/06/2010 04:48:05 PM 643 Views
Ooooh. - 03/06/2010 03:20:49 PM 631 Views
Re: Ooooh. - 03/06/2010 11:48:11 PM 592 Views
I wrote a suggestion ticket for it... - 04/06/2010 01:46:49 PM 701 Views
The way I heard it it wasn't the WoTMB that wanted the split. - 02/06/2010 04:59:58 PM 852 Views
"Death throes", not "death throws" - 02/06/2010 11:44:27 PM 615 Views
Ad nauseam is one I'll completely agree about you correcting me on. - 03/06/2010 01:44:07 AM 661 Views
Right, sorry. - 03/06/2010 03:19:42 PM 589 Views
I think there's a bigger flaw than that - 04/06/2010 06:25:27 AM 684 Views
Suggestions are more than welcome. - 04/06/2010 09:47:30 AM 604 Views
SEO alone isn't an answer. - 04/06/2010 11:51:49 AM 837 Views
+1 to all of that. *NM* - 04/06/2010 01:18:04 PM 286 Views
Oh, no, certainly not. But it is a Start. - 04/06/2010 01:30:53 PM 584 Views
And a good one - 04/06/2010 01:55:16 PM 600 Views
Waaaait a minute - 04/06/2010 06:56:23 PM 593 Views
SEO? - 04/06/2010 05:31:38 PM 708 Views
Search engine optimization - had to look it up too. - 04/06/2010 06:48:18 PM 581 Views
Ah - 04/06/2010 07:11:05 PM 810 Views
You are all very blog-centric - 04/06/2010 10:18:18 PM 579 Views
No offense taken - 05/06/2010 12:32:37 AM 600 Views
A forum by any other name... - 05/06/2010 01:00:56 AM 627 Views
Don't let the door hit you on the way out - 02/06/2010 07:06:50 PM 716 Views
A pleasure as always. *NM* - 02/06/2010 07:42:31 PM 229 Views
He's never said he was leaving. - 03/06/2010 01:37:27 AM 605 Views
Well, Jens, at least you're transparent in your "admin" efforts. I laud you for that. *NM* - 03/06/2010 01:46:18 PM 263 Views
I was going to change it to "... you beautiful banana". - 03/06/2010 03:17:51 PM 558 Views
Oh, and FYI; - 03/06/2010 03:24:00 PM 551 Views
Re: Oh, and FYI; - 03/06/2010 11:26:41 PM 572 Views
Gee how'd I know you'd show up. - 03/06/2010 09:08:14 PM 575 Views
I am pleased you follow my posts so closely. - 03/06/2010 11:31:16 PM 584 Views
I'm not a believer in Scottish independence for now. - 03/06/2010 11:44:30 PM 567 Views
Neutrality is far more preferable. - 04/06/2010 12:00:23 AM 566 Views
Can't speak for others, BUT... - 02/06/2010 02:27:50 AM 748 Views
You might also consider a comment here: - 02/06/2010 03:17:59 AM 614 Views
Well, the Journal section could be your blog... *NM* - 02/06/2010 08:04:24 AM 241 Views
But I post several reviews from the OF Blog here! - 02/06/2010 08:16:41 AM 650 Views
It is not as if the board is flooded. More posts is good. - 02/06/2010 09:34:42 AM 605 Views
Joe FTW. *NM* - 02/06/2010 12:16:55 PM 292 Views
I'm making fajitas tonight, and a soup tomorrow. And then I'm going to poop. - 02/06/2010 04:08:34 PM 618 Views
Probably me. - 02/06/2010 05:21:23 PM 723 Views
Absolutely not! - 02/06/2010 06:39:49 PM 638 Views
Oh my - - 02/06/2010 07:56:28 PM 622 Views
We still don't have a winner here - 02/06/2010 07:57:25 PM 605 Views
I've known since the beginning, but ladies are tactful. Or something. *NM* - 02/06/2010 08:08:01 PM 250 Views
I think I know who it is too. But I'm thinking of a female... *NM* - 02/06/2010 11:24:19 PM 240 Views
Maybe the person was female. Greg seems to think so. - 02/06/2010 11:45:18 PM 577 Views
OMG - 03/06/2010 05:00:27 AM 594 Views
- 03/06/2010 05:31:29 AM 554 Views
That sounds delicious. If you ever need a place and audience to cook for. . . - 03/06/2010 07:04:17 PM 577 Views
I like many of the trends in food today. - 03/06/2010 08:54:20 PM 636 Views
ok, I am curious now - 04/06/2010 06:57:47 PM 566 Views
I was in no way referring to you, m'friend. - 03/06/2010 01:35:44 AM 593 Views
Thank you - 03/06/2010 01:06:26 PM 523 Views
I can only stand you when you're wearing a paper bag over your head. *NM* - 02/06/2010 07:07:42 PM 293 Views
You're really going to voice that? - 03/06/2010 05:09:38 AM 620 Views

Reply to Message