It just seems unlikely that they'd really be doing that on BP's request.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 04/06/2010 01:04:04 AM
...that they're trying to do the whole "nothing to see here, move along, move along" bit. Clearly, there is quite a bit to see there. Also, what reason could they have for trying to prevent reporters and photographers from trying to do flyovers of the beaches and the Gulf itself? The public has a right to see and know what is going and not just what BP and the government want us to know.
But yeah, I don't know why else they'd do it, either. I take it that now that there's a controversy about it, they'll have to justify their policies.
What BP doesn't want you to see.
04/06/2010 12:20:43 AM
- 774 Views
Ye gods. I can see why. Those pictures certainly make an impression.
04/06/2010 12:53:14 AM
- 512 Views
The impression I get from previously reading some reporters' comments is....
04/06/2010 12:58:04 AM
- 513 Views
It just seems unlikely that they'd really be doing that on BP's request.
04/06/2010 01:04:04 AM
- 556 Views
Those are awful sights.
04/06/2010 01:14:41 AM
- 526 Views
There is reason to be hopeful.
04/06/2010 11:20:03 AM
- 465 Views
Thanks for linking this. *NM*
04/06/2010 01:57:26 AM
- 208 Views
You're welcome.
04/06/2010 11:21:39 AM
- 458 Views
I figured as much. I really appreciate it though, and the is my appreciation smiley. *NM*
04/06/2010 11:48:55 PM
- 212 Views
One thing I've always wondered...
04/06/2010 03:03:08 AM
- 561 Views
well for one thing once they get the oil on them they are trapped
04/06/2010 04:07:33 PM
- 450 Views
Not to downplay it, but those pictures are all of like 3 or 4 birds.
04/06/2010 03:54:18 PM
- 452 Views
Clearly all those Environmentalists were wrong.
04/06/2010 09:55:20 PM
- 539 Views
The only thing "dripping" is the drool off your chin, you mouth-breathing troll.
04/06/2010 10:41:31 PM
- 442 Views