mm. well I don't much like that either, to be honest.
LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 24/05/2010 03:00:29 PM
We wouldn't be limiting ourselves to conventional weapons at that point. Tactical nuclear shells from artillery comes to mind. Note that the US recently refused to rule out the use of nuclear weapons against North Korea when it said that it would never use nuclear weapons except in defense against nations that were parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
It would be more efficient, and on practicality I could probably stand behind it. On the other hand, that's an obscene loss of life of people who are likely not responsible for their government's actions.
Unless I'm misunderstanding the scope of damage from a tactical nuclear shell. I'm thinking along the lines of the WWII bombs, but if these aren't as devastating then that's something different. If we could locally wipe out mostly-military areas that way without devastating too much of the surrounding land and people, that would be awesome
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Oh, by the way...has anyone noticed how close the Korean peninsula is to war?
24/05/2010 02:04:12 PM
- 992 Views
I was wondering when something would be posted about this
24/05/2010 02:49:54 PM
- 690 Views
But does North Korea really listen to China that much anymore?
24/05/2010 02:55:04 PM
- 626 Views
that might well be a good point
24/05/2010 03:20:32 PM
- 586 Views
The explaination I have heard...
24/05/2010 09:05:40 PM
- 652 Views
Kim made one of his rare trips outside of North Korea about two weeks ago.
26/05/2010 07:49:18 AM
- 627 Views
yah, it doesn't look to be a good situation
24/05/2010 02:50:08 PM
- 604 Views
If there were a war with North Korea the US has the resources to deal with it.
24/05/2010 02:56:39 PM
- 622 Views
mm. well I don't much like that either, to be honest.
24/05/2010 03:00:29 PM
- 609 Views
Still scary and you know that using those would escalate everything.
24/05/2010 03:26:12 PM
- 575 Views
Korea is directly in our sphere of influence
24/05/2010 03:37:18 PM
- 520 Views
I meant "we" in a personal sense, not a national sense.
24/05/2010 05:36:40 PM
- 669 Views
In a personal sense, we could hijack a nuclear silo and shoot an ICBM at Pyongyang.
24/05/2010 05:50:52 PM
- 508 Views
That would totally blow my cover of being a nerdy little grandma.
24/05/2010 09:37:28 PM
- 527 Views
A part of me says just get it over with
24/05/2010 03:21:06 PM
- 518 Views
I agree that if war is inevitable, it is much better to start it at a time of our choosing.
24/05/2010 03:48:36 PM
- 662 Views
I'm trying not to. *NM*
24/05/2010 05:25:06 PM
- 214 Views
I try to block it out with thought's of a puppet singing "I'm So Ronery". *NM*
24/05/2010 10:59:23 PM
- 231 Views
No one wants to resume the Korean War.
24/05/2010 11:27:12 PM
- 632 Views
China does.
25/05/2010 12:29:11 AM
- 581 Views
No, they don't
25/05/2010 12:54:49 AM
- 612 Views
Well, it would be more accurate to say they want a conflict, yes.
25/05/2010 01:15:23 AM
- 606 Views
No, they don't
25/05/2010 01:24:17 AM
- 594 Views
I'm saying the Cold War isn't over, since it was never about capitalism vs. communism to begin.
25/05/2010 01:41:28 AM
- 633 Views
North Korea is not acting suicidal? Are you kidding?
25/05/2010 02:41:29 AM
- 568 Views
The internal political dynamic in North Korea is such that they constantly need a crisis.
25/05/2010 03:03:59 AM
- 586 Views
You are missing the main point.
25/05/2010 03:36:37 AM
- 624 Views
I'm not saying it's nothing new.
25/05/2010 03:57:40 AM
- 600 Views
Your response highlights the ultimate problem: the crisis will have to keep getting bigger.
25/05/2010 07:44:19 PM
- 533 Views
Yes, I've been watching with morbid curiosity and a little sick feeling in my stomach.
25/05/2010 02:47:53 AM
- 645 Views