Active Users:439 Time:22/04/2025 09:56:20 AM
Indeed Danu Send a noteboard - 23/05/2010 07:11:27 PM
Women's and men's.
Why does spell check show it to be wrong?

I've almost exclusively dated guys who absolutely love going down on women, without trying to select for that trait. Apparently you're attracted to men who don't have that particular trait. So it's far more interesting to find out if there's a correlation between particular traits, and why you don't find them attractive.

Not all the men I've dated dislike going down but the majority has.
Hmmm...I was married to a gay man for 13 years...maybe I'm attracted to men who have a latent gay gene? Even that big strong, seemingly, manly man?
CrazedWeasel
OCWIATJ Forever!
Reply to message
/Surveyish? Sex question for heterosexual men, so beware. - 23/05/2010 05:22:43 AM 884 Views
Replyish, beware. - 23/05/2010 06:15:17 AM 737 Views
Don't be shy D. - 23/05/2010 06:49:23 AM 642 Views
You're obviously dating the wrong men - 23/05/2010 06:56:24 AM 712 Views
Indeed - 23/05/2010 07:11:27 PM 645 Views
Why the hell not - 23/05/2010 07:55:39 AM 680 Views
*wonders how long it will take a guy to post a survey asking girls about blow jobs* *NM* - 23/05/2010 08:15:09 AM 273 Views
Approximately eight hours. - 23/05/2010 01:36:17 PM 775 Views
*shudders* *NM* - 23/05/2010 01:19:52 PM 251 Views
You don't enjoy getting head? *NM* - 23/05/2010 06:22:45 PM 246 Views
NB sent. *NM* - 23/05/2010 02:40:31 PM 281 Views
Re: /Surveyish? Sex question for heterosexual men, so beware. - 23/05/2010 04:44:09 PM 619 Views
Re: /Surveyish? Sex question for heterosexual men, so beware. - 23/05/2010 07:04:41 PM 555 Views
Re: Sex for heterosexual men - 23/05/2010 05:31:29 PM 692 Views
Re: Sex for heterosexual men - 23/05/2010 07:12:44 PM 577 Views
Well, you know my unfortunate deal, but I'll answer anyway - 24/05/2010 05:54:48 AM 607 Views
Nothing to beware of here - just answers - 24/05/2010 09:55:32 AM 603 Views
Re: /Surveyish? Sex question for heterosexual men, so beware. - 24/05/2010 05:05:39 PM 558 Views

Reply to Message