People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
snoopcester Send a noteboard - 14/05/2010 11:40:25 AM
(and this is what has been annoying me about loads of usually intelligent people): it is unfair to judge a modern party based on what the party with the same name did in the past. 13 years mightn't seem like a long time, but it is these days, and the Conservatives are currently lead by a chap who is only 43. Young(er) people tend to be more ... liberal.
Mrs Thatcher was very much her own person - so much so, in fact, that she was ultimately brought down by a party rebellion. There's therefore no reason to suppose that the modern Tories will follow her footsteps. And I've seen that pundits are calling some of the younger chaps Thatcherites: based on what? They've not had any power at all. Comparisons are ridiculous at this point.
It is generally a good idea to assume a magazine like the Spectator has a pretty good idea of what is going on in the Tory party -
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article7125806.ece
Fraser Nelson is writing in The Times but is current editor of The Spectator magazine.
"As several surveys show, the typical new Tory MP is reform-minded and resolutely Eurosceptic — the type of Tory who has posters of Thatcher on the wall and Jacques Delors on the dartboard."
There is still a clear element of the old Tory party still around, Hague and IDS being the most obvious examples (aside from Clarke who was an actual ex-Thatcher minister and ironically isn't an old style Tory).
I'd be perfectly fine with you being this negative etc if they had given you reason to be recently. They haven't. They've been in Opposition. You actually cannot accurately gauge a party's policies and standards on their Opposition years because their job is to Oppose. That doesn't necessarily show their true colours.
Well there is their manifesto which had some clear out and out old style Tory policies which counts against them.
The 55% for dissolution of Parliament is at best a pretty bone-headed move and at worst an attempt to alter the system to protect the Government from future unpopularity in an undemocratic way. Not a great start there.
Give it a year and come back to me then.
Time will tell, for me though it is for them to prove themselves, not be given a free ride. There have been some good moves - mostly the choices of Minister for Justice and Attorney General. There is still a lot to prove though, so we shall see.
*MySmiley*
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
How to live with the Tories
13/05/2010 12:33:49 PM
- 1029 Views
Her 101 reasons to love our Tory government was even better.
13/05/2010 12:42:39 PM
- 692 Views
What an even-handed, stereotype-free, and balanced piece of journalism. *NM*
13/05/2010 02:07:35 PM
- 321 Views
Your partisanship is getting annoying, actually.
13/05/2010 06:55:28 PM
- 765 Views
I'm sorry I care about politics.
13/05/2010 08:45:26 PM
- 705 Views
It's easy to complain. Actually doing something is rather more difficult. *NM*
13/05/2010 10:17:47 PM
- 293 Views
What do you suggest I do, pray tell? *NM*
13/05/2010 10:19:30 PM
- 276 Views
Learn how to live with people who disagree with you.
13/05/2010 10:21:08 PM
- 610 Views
Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:29:38 PM
- 730 Views
Do you really spell it "superiour" in Britain? That's wonderful.
13/05/2010 10:37:21 PM
- 758 Views
Pretty please with sugar on top
13/05/2010 10:50:48 PM
- 682 Views
Meh. That wasn't meant to be condescending. I never expected the ou to enter that word, is all.
13/05/2010 11:02:11 PM
- 652 Views
Re: Meh. That wasn't meant to be condescending. I never expected the ou to enter that word, is all.
13/05/2010 11:03:42 PM
- 616 Views
Yeah, um, that wasn't me.
13/05/2010 11:08:48 PM
- 639 Views
Re: Yeah, um, that wasn't me.
13/05/2010 11:11:04 PM
- 641 Views
I don't mind transference of anger, but let's keep my quotes accurate at least.
13/05/2010 11:15:37 PM
- 650 Views

See, this is what I find offensive
13/05/2010 11:21:28 PM
- 644 Views
Fair enough. It was unfair of me to use "learn."
13/05/2010 11:30:34 PM
- 623 Views
Two posts in three days about a new Government in the country?
13/05/2010 11:18:06 PM
- 654 Views
This is so true
13/05/2010 11:29:30 PM
- 619 Views
Re: This is so true
13/05/2010 11:36:44 PM
- 631 Views
Sorry. But I can't bring myself to vote for 'that bloody party'
13/05/2010 11:48:26 PM
- 617 Views
Re: Sorry. But I can't bring myself to vote for 'that bloody party'
13/05/2010 11:54:10 PM
- 610 Views
I certainly wouldn't go that far. Nowhere near. *NM*
13/05/2010 11:43:20 PM
- 318 Views
On the comparison or on you people's spelling?
*NM*
14/05/2010 12:13:42 AM
- 290 Views

They were not delivered condescendingly. I am sorry you took it as such.
13/05/2010 11:50:23 PM
- 601 Views
Re: They were not delivered condescendingly. I am sorry you took it as such.
13/05/2010 11:53:08 PM
- 640 Views
Eh, another time then.
13/05/2010 11:56:21 PM
- 668 Views
I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:43:12 PM
- 744 Views
Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 10:59:28 PM
- 645 Views
Re: I was gonna make a post with precisely the same title as Camilla's. So: Oh, come on.
13/05/2010 11:16:07 PM
- 761 Views
I dunno. It looks to me that's what Balwer was saying with his flogged horse comment.
13/05/2010 11:18:30 PM
- 568 Views
I'm sorry you care more about your own political agenda than about trying to see a party in power
13/05/2010 11:44:32 PM
- 571 Views
You think Tories won't go proto-Orwellian on you?
13/05/2010 11:46:45 PM
- 557 Views
If both, theoretically, will abuse power, then
13/05/2010 11:54:53 PM
- 655 Views
Re: If both, theoretically, will abuse power, then
13/05/2010 11:58:17 PM
- 649 Views
Thing is,
13/05/2010 11:55:17 PM
- 637 Views
Re: Thing is,
13/05/2010 11:59:58 PM
- 739 Views
A date "in a year's time" will be easy to remember. We have Scottish elections on 5 May 2011.
14/05/2010 12:12:26 PM
- 561 Views
People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 11:40:25 AM
- 709 Views
Re: People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 01:05:44 PM
- 639 Views
Re: People are saying it because those with a good knowledge of the party are telling them that.
14/05/2010 01:28:38 PM
- 756 Views