Active Users:596 Time:15/03/2026 12:16:17 PM
Everyone get something different from a book random thoughts Send a noteboard - 19/04/2010 07:01:51 PM
But to me when I read the book back in the 80s and when I reread it a years are so ago the overriding theme of the book was how ineffective power can be and how powerful religion can be as well as the danger of trying to control and use religion. The book was as much about the Middle East and British Empire as it was about anything else. Saying that the desert was a main character because it influenced the actions and lives of the characters is similar to saying that hard vacuum is a character in a space novel because it has such a strong impact on the story.

I know there has a been push to define the book as a book about ecology but from my point of view that appears to be an attempt to hijack the book.
Reply to message
Frank Herbert, Dune Chronicles (series reviews within) - 16/04/2010 04:11:40 AM 2082 Views
Re: Frank Herbert, Dune - 16/04/2010 06:09:49 PM 1177 Views
Re: Frank Herbert, Dune - 17/04/2010 12:08:06 AM 1384 Views
Re: Frank Herbert, Dune - 17/04/2010 02:33:38 PM 1305 Views
I was using a fairly precise term when I said "ecological" - 18/04/2010 12:13:14 AM 1300 Views
Re: I was using a fairly precise term when I said "ecological" - 18/04/2010 03:34:33 AM 1356 Views
Please read linked interview...as I call bullshit. Also, why are your walls white? - 18/04/2010 05:18:07 AM 1161 Views
Re: Please read linked interview...as I call bullshit. Also, why are your walls white? - 19/04/2010 06:15:26 PM 1214 Views
That was most of my issue. - 21/04/2010 12:12:56 AM 1079 Views
Re: That was most of my issue. - 21/04/2010 06:33:14 PM 1030 Views
Re: That was most of my issue. - 29/04/2010 11:38:26 PM 1017 Views
Just because something plays a dominate role doesn't make it a theme - 21/04/2010 02:09:42 PM 1168 Views
A theme is merely a dominant strain in a story; there can be more than one theme present - 21/04/2010 11:21:38 PM 1095 Views
Re: A theme is merely a dominant strain in a story; there can be more than one theme present - 22/04/2010 04:58:01 AM 1069 Views
Good points - 22/04/2010 09:19:45 PM 1129 Views
Re: Good points - 22/04/2010 10:55:21 PM 1065 Views
when you call it human ecology I come much closer to agreeing - 22/04/2010 02:16:58 PM 1075 Views
Not really sure how Larry's definition is archaic. - 19/04/2010 07:52:27 PM 1177 Views
Re: Not really sure how Larry's definition is archaic. - 20/04/2010 07:04:40 PM 1050 Views
You're not using "archaic" correctly - 20/04/2010 10:07:31 PM 1041 Views
Your patronizing manner aside, that's not "archaic" at all. - 21/04/2010 01:46:50 AM 954 Views
doesn't that regulate the point down to interesting trivia? - 21/04/2010 02:36:38 PM 1094 Views
Re: Your patronizing manner aside, that's not "archaic" at all. - 21/04/2010 06:23:24 PM 1191 Views
Funny the things people focus on - 21/04/2010 11:24:59 PM 1065 Views
Re: Funny the things people focus on - 23/04/2010 05:28:54 PM 1058 Views
People who see this as an ecological book are missing the point of the book - 16/04/2010 06:28:40 PM 1566 Views
Books can have more than one theme. Great books almost always do. *NM* - 16/04/2010 07:15:11 PM 521 Views
I agree with that I just never really the ecological theme to Dune - 16/04/2010 10:12:26 PM 1252 Views
Ecology goes more than one way - 17/04/2010 12:12:45 AM 1187 Views
There are several points to the book/series - 17/04/2010 12:11:38 AM 1281 Views
Everyone get something different from a book - 19/04/2010 07:01:51 PM 1456 Views
I believe those themes become more pronounced later in the series - 20/04/2010 10:09:36 PM 1207 Views
I remember having hated every single character of this book. Some random thoughts - 17/04/2010 05:08:25 PM 1381 Views
I hope you got to Darwi Odrade - 21/04/2010 03:44:27 PM 1089 Views
Re: Frank Herbert, Dune - 17/04/2010 08:05:16 PM 1665 Views
I guess we'll have a few disagreements here, Dom - 17/04/2010 10:22:27 PM 1468 Views
Re: I guess we'll have a few disagreements here, Dom - 18/04/2010 04:38:10 AM 1425 Views
Re: I guess we'll have a few disagreements here, Dom - 19/04/2010 04:04:43 AM 1332 Views
Re: I guess we'll have a few disagreements here, Dom - 22/04/2010 04:31:26 AM 1085 Views
I thought all of Dune had begun as a serial in a SF magazine. *NM* - 22/04/2010 01:58:22 PM 470 Views
And Dune Messiah as well was serialized at first, in Galaxy *NM* - 22/04/2010 09:31:54 PM 474 Views
Dune Messiah (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 19/04/2010 08:42:18 AM 1491 Views
Re: Dune Messiah (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 21/04/2010 03:33:46 PM 1082 Views
I didn't see that in Alia - 21/04/2010 11:27:22 PM 1003 Views
One of my favorite series! - 21/04/2010 03:30:57 PM 996 Views
I didn't "miss it" as much as I chose to deemphasize it - 21/04/2010 11:29:50 PM 920 Views
Re: I didn't "miss it" as much as I chose to deemphasize it - 22/04/2010 04:02:26 PM 1027 Views
His style doesn't appeal to me as much, unfortunately - 22/04/2010 09:17:21 PM 950 Views
You might want to track down his short stories one day... - 23/04/2010 02:06:09 PM 1139 Views
Children of Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 22/04/2010 06:47:04 AM 1123 Views
See...I think I made a mistake in my reading of Dune - 22/04/2010 07:26:28 AM 1098 Views
Depends - 22/04/2010 08:01:39 AM 995 Views
Re: Depends - 22/04/2010 11:12:15 PM 1378 Views
read something else - 23/04/2010 07:49:34 PM 989 Views
LA Times article on Dune (4/18/2010) - 23/04/2010 10:59:00 AM 937 Views
God Emperor of Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 25/04/2010 02:03:37 AM 1259 Views
Heretics of Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 28/04/2010 06:02:54 AM 965 Views
Re: Heretics of Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 29/04/2010 03:26:28 PM 1056 Views
I read the wiki synopses of those two books - 29/04/2010 09:44:07 PM 983 Views
Re: I read the wiki synopses of those two books - 10/05/2010 04:10:49 AM 1352 Views
Chapterhouse: Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 30/04/2010 02:31:10 PM 1160 Views
Re: Chapterhouse: Dune (2001 initial read; 2010 re-read) - 10/05/2010 01:24:33 AM 1200 Views

Reply to Message