Active Users:1207 Time:22/11/2024 06:41:25 PM
Rohan was a whiny hypocritical bitch who failed at the only real test of rulership he ever faced. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 10/04/2010 02:51:34 AM
I would have thought with your name you'd give serious consideration to Emperor Karl Culinane.

Going with a tie between King Kelson from Katherine Kurtz Deryni novels and High Prince Rohan (they didn't actually have the title of "King" but that's the job under a different name) from Melanie Rawn's Dragon Prince/Star books.


I loathed him and his obnoxious brat son, but at least the little turd won the war. Rohan, even by the standards of people who worshipped the ground he walked on, was a crap leader when his "kingdom" was invaded, and failed and almost lost, except for his fortuitous death allowing the (marginally) competant people a chance to do their thing.
As a ruler, he mostly lucked out in having people come to his rescue because of family loyalty and had an awful lot of political dilemmas he was fortuitously able to resolve with a knife fight. His entire program of rule was an obnoxious power grab intended to take power from the individual princes and place it all in the hands of the High Prince. THe difference between him and Roelstra was his assertion that he was sensitive and didn't like it. The vast majority of his success came from the fact that he was the son of a badass who made their homeland secure, had a capable soldier for a brother-in-law who could do the heavy lifting for him until it was time for Rohan to win the war in a contrived duel, and a machiavellian aunt who set him up with an incredibly fortuitous marriage. And the aberrant and unrealistic zoology (WTF do that many dragons EAT, and in sufficient quantities to be able to fly, no less; and assuming they consume an appropriate number of herd animals, where does he get off forbidding anyone to kill them, just because he thinks they're pretty? ) of their world just happens to work in a way that makes him exponentially richer than any other ruler.

It didn't help that Melanie Rawn had possibly the worst grasp of military or governmental concepts of any author I have ever read. The bit where she has a group of doctors prove more deadly in battle than trained soldiers because of their exquisite knowledge of anatomy was utterly ridiculous, her feminist assertions that women were every bit as capable as men at being medieval soldiers - and rubbed in by having female soldiers featured prominently, and the way everyone but the selfish and greedy fell over backward to admire a hypocrite who preaches an ideal and looks down on his peers for their scholastic shortcomings and general inferiority to his idealistic awesomeness, while he goes about accumulating power and offing people who get in his way.

Rawn is a gifted writer (or seemed that way when I was an adolescent) but she has no freaking clue what to write about, or how the world works. She's like the anti-Brandon Sanderson.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
This message last edited by Cannoli on 10/04/2010 at 03:34:24 AM
Reply to message
The greatest King in Fantasy - 09/04/2010 05:18:42 AM 1817 Views
King Arthur. Hands down. - 09/04/2010 06:40:15 AM 1213 Views
I would argue with you. - 09/04/2010 06:54:53 AM 1163 Views
That's the point, though. Arthur's humanity is what makes him so admirable. - 09/04/2010 06:59:07 AM 1210 Views
I have to agree with Dannymac - 09/04/2010 02:04:44 PM 1207 Views
But he's not in a modern fantasy novel. - 09/04/2010 07:37:14 PM 1227 Views
when I read the actual book... - 10/04/2010 12:08:21 AM 1221 Views
I'm going with the most likely historical version of King Arthur - 09/04/2010 06:45:26 PM 1255 Views
My money is still on Aragorn - 09/04/2010 12:47:43 PM 1327 Views
Aragorn is so awesome... - 09/04/2010 02:05:42 PM 1174 Views
Arwen's character is just never fleshed out, though. - 09/04/2010 02:18:30 PM 1149 Views
Re: Arwen's character is just never fleshed out, though. - 09/04/2010 02:49:45 PM 1209 Views
Hm - 09/04/2010 03:23:53 PM 1260 Views
Mostly, yes, but there are a few exceptions - Galadriel, Eowyn, and above all Luthien. - 09/04/2010 03:32:00 PM 1161 Views
Re: Mostly, yes, but there are a few exceptions - Galadriel, Eowyn, and above all Luthien. - 09/04/2010 03:45:37 PM 1413 Views
I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 04:34:15 PM 1288 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 04:55:34 PM 1153 Views
If Tacitus and Graves were accurate - 09/04/2010 05:09:20 PM 1236 Views
Re: If Tacitus and Graves were accurate - 09/04/2010 05:26:43 PM 1170 Views
I rather liked her depiction in Rome. - 09/04/2010 05:34:37 PM 1236 Views
Re: I rather liked her depiction in Rome. - 09/04/2010 05:45:06 PM 1302 Views
Re: I rather liked her depiction in Rome. - 10/04/2010 11:14:26 AM 1323 Views
I don't know if I'd call it bad, per se. - 10/04/2010 11:37:55 AM 1401 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 05:02:50 PM 1203 Views
Eh, the other Vala don't do much of anything either. - 09/04/2010 05:31:42 PM 1162 Views
Re: Eh, the other Vala don't do much of anything either. - 09/04/2010 05:44:03 PM 1204 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 05:06:49 PM 1320 Views
I call bullshit - 09/04/2010 08:09:49 PM 1156 Views
Re: I call bullshit - 09/04/2010 08:31:16 PM 1175 Views
Re: I call bullshit - 10/04/2010 08:04:15 AM 1256 Views
I didn't realize it was fashionable to call Tolkien sexist. - 10/04/2010 05:12:07 PM 1251 Views
Re: I didn't realize it was fashionable to call Tolkien sexist. - 12/04/2010 11:00:23 AM 1123 Views
Exactly. - 13/04/2010 03:08:46 AM 1221 Views
Re: Exactly. - 13/04/2010 08:54:01 AM 1299 Views
I was going to say something similar. - 09/04/2010 03:21:45 PM 1183 Views
Re: Aragorn is so awesome... - 09/04/2010 08:00:25 PM 1170 Views
Re: Aragorn is so awesome... - 09/04/2010 08:37:12 PM 1178 Views
He's good, but then he just doesn't have to face so many things. - 09/04/2010 02:22:04 PM 1480 Views
Doesn't have to face many things? - 09/04/2010 07:59:27 PM 1224 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 09/04/2010 08:38:51 PM 1061 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 10/04/2010 08:24:33 AM 1166 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 10/04/2010 05:08:42 PM 1311 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 12/04/2010 10:55:12 AM 1158 Views
He really wasn't a king in majority of the story though - 12/04/2010 05:54:23 PM 1111 Views
I'm sure there are many, but one coming to mind is Prince Josua from Memory, Sorrow and Thorn - 09/04/2010 02:23:57 PM 1169 Views
Oh yeah I liked him a lot *NM* - 09/04/2010 04:09:59 PM 553 Views
Josua Lackhand is a great fantasy King! - 09/04/2010 05:14:39 PM 1231 Views
Arutha was never King. *NM* - 09/04/2010 07:18:30 PM 533 Views
I'm going to go with a tie... - 09/04/2010 04:22:42 PM 1188 Views
Rohan was a whiny hypocritical bitch who failed at the only real test of rulership he ever faced. - 10/04/2010 02:51:34 AM 1231 Views
That actually slipped my mind. I can't believe that. - 16/04/2010 04:44:46 PM 1266 Views
Joffrey and the Stag! *NM* - 09/04/2010 09:53:56 PM 534 Views
ROFL *NM* - 09/04/2010 11:39:36 PM 507 Views
Artur Hawkwing - 10/04/2010 03:34:02 AM 1324 Views
??? - 10/04/2010 10:30:13 AM 1572 Views
Simba *NM* - 10/04/2010 08:40:38 AM 580 Views
Manwe - 10/04/2010 10:31:54 AM 1475 Views
Bah. He's hardly a character. *NM* - 12/04/2010 01:07:29 AM 661 Views
Arutha, the Prince of Krondor - 12/04/2010 01:06:14 AM 1232 Views
Westley - 13/04/2010 02:59:36 AM 1159 Views
Leto Atreides II - 13/04/2010 05:07:29 AM 1125 Views
I'll agree with that! *NM* - 13/04/2010 11:33:10 AM 534 Views

Reply to Message