I got them for him. He read the first book in two evenings. And the second one the next two. He is 9 now. Will be 10 in a few months. I think you need to let kids explore their limits. He said he may wait to read the next one.
that kids know what it is to recognize a limit and not cross it. Even crossing that limit once can be destructive.
Take the example of kids eating too much Halloween candy. They get sick, the puke up all over themselves, and they are miserable. So if the next day is a school day...you make them get up, and you make them go. You can always point out "I told you not to eat so much...." but well they didn't listen.
Now replace candy with heroin or meth. The aftermath is hardly so innocent and the chance of a repeat is that much worse.
Now I'm not saying that the HP books are the literary equivilent to meth. I'm just pointing out recognizing a limit and pointing it out may be the better option.
~Jeordam
It may also backfire.
My mother told me not to read some books when I was a kid. Now some of them I read anyway, and I didn't understand them. It didn't affect me adversely to have read them, though, because a quick re-read fixed that a few years later. But I still haven't read some of the ones that she told me not to read, in part because a part of me still thinks it is 9 years old. Now, I may be special, but I don't think a book can actually break a kid's brain.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Harry Potter (the entire series)
06/04/2010 11:00:07 PM
- 1694 Views
Re: Harry Potter (the entire series)
06/04/2010 11:29:49 PM
- 981 Views
Really?
07/04/2010 05:41:46 PM
- 1018 Views
I honestly think it's a combination of the two
07/04/2010 05:55:18 PM
- 906 Views
I'll give you that....
07/04/2010 06:11:27 PM
- 926 Views
It does seem logical that the series gets more teenager-oriented as Harry grows older.
07/04/2010 06:47:57 PM
- 932 Views
Re: Harry Potter (the entire series)
07/04/2010 12:26:22 AM
- 1238 Views
I get where you're coming from
07/04/2010 06:19:13 PM
- 1027 Views
That's kind of the point though...
07/04/2010 08:44:26 PM
- 970 Views
This is how I see it too
08/04/2010 12:43:03 AM
- 1086 Views
just a comment about your rich=bad
08/04/2010 02:05:32 AM
- 1041 Views
I agree with many of your points.
07/04/2010 12:44:31 AM
- 1133 Views
I have to dispute the concept of going "too far."
07/04/2010 06:32:47 AM
- 886 Views
Hm, I don't know.
07/04/2010 11:08:12 AM
- 971 Views
This is a lot like the argument I'm having with Joel on the CMB concerning original sin.
08/04/2010 07:21:39 AM
- 879 Views
Where is this debate? I'd like to read it.
08/04/2010 05:18:38 PM
- 1537 Views
I should have put "debate" in quotes. It's about four sentences long.
08/04/2010 10:32:43 PM
- 877 Views
More conversation on Snape.
07/04/2010 06:01:37 PM
- 1183 Views
His death wasn't very spectacular, but he did play an essential role...
07/04/2010 06:45:58 PM
- 1073 Views
Brief comments on Magic, Dumbledore, and The Epilogue.
07/04/2010 07:13:55 AM
- 1227 Views
Re: Brief comments on Magic, Dumbledore, and The Epilogue.
07/04/2010 06:09:20 PM
- 1078 Views
The movies are even worse about this.
07/04/2010 06:15:35 PM
- 958 Views
Death doesn't actually happen in slow-motion fit for the cinema screen.
08/04/2010 07:24:31 AM
- 968 Views
Re: Death doesn't actually happen in slow-motion fit for the cinema screen.
08/04/2010 03:27:09 PM
- 940 Views
Harry Potter and Star Wars have two radically different approaches to this
07/04/2010 06:13:25 PM
- 1143 Views
When my son asked for his own set of Harry Potter books,
07/04/2010 10:26:37 PM
- 979 Views
This is assuming of course...
07/04/2010 11:00:15 PM
- 1032 Views
Re: This is assuming of course...
08/04/2010 03:30:33 PM
- 1083 Views
I was most irritated by the ironic names
08/04/2010 05:38:59 AM
- 1058 Views
Re: I was most irritated by the ironic names
08/04/2010 10:07:40 PM
- 1339 Views
Exactly - it's not as obvious if you're a kid, then it seems clever and it's fun to decode.
09/04/2010 01:04:11 AM
- 1008 Views