The reason why the first books seem simplistic and the last books so dense is because JKR intentionally wrote it for the development of her audience. In the first book, a young child really wouldn't understand what's so bad about living under the stairs, it probably seems like oodles of fun to them. Looking back, as you did, they would realize the importance of what Harry endured. But as the audience gets older, JKR's writing becomes more advanced, as it should. I don't know about you, but I definitely would have stopped reading if the difficulty remained at an elementary level. To me, its not simplistic but brilliant, as Harry would say.
I didn't see it so much as gearing it for her target reader, as that was her writing style at the time. Like anyone, they get better at their job as they get more experience. I was seeing the whole thing as a literary example of the author's progression as a writter. But I would have probably tuned out and left the series if it stayed that simple. As it was, the first few books were such easy reads, that I would fly through them. And I am certainly not a fast reader.
~Jeordam
ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Harry Potter (the entire series)
06/04/2010 11:00:07 PM
- 1692 Views
Re: Harry Potter (the entire series)
06/04/2010 11:29:49 PM
- 981 Views
Really?
07/04/2010 05:41:46 PM
- 1018 Views
I honestly think it's a combination of the two
07/04/2010 05:55:18 PM
- 904 Views
I'll give you that....
07/04/2010 06:11:27 PM
- 925 Views
It does seem logical that the series gets more teenager-oriented as Harry grows older.
07/04/2010 06:47:57 PM
- 930 Views
Re: Harry Potter (the entire series)
07/04/2010 12:26:22 AM
- 1237 Views
I get where you're coming from
07/04/2010 06:19:13 PM
- 1026 Views
That's kind of the point though...
07/04/2010 08:44:26 PM
- 969 Views
This is how I see it too
08/04/2010 12:43:03 AM
- 1084 Views
just a comment about your rich=bad
08/04/2010 02:05:32 AM
- 1039 Views
I agree with many of your points.
07/04/2010 12:44:31 AM
- 1132 Views
I have to dispute the concept of going "too far."
07/04/2010 06:32:47 AM
- 886 Views
Hm, I don't know.
07/04/2010 11:08:12 AM
- 970 Views
This is a lot like the argument I'm having with Joel on the CMB concerning original sin.
08/04/2010 07:21:39 AM
- 877 Views
Where is this debate? I'd like to read it.
08/04/2010 05:18:38 PM
- 1536 Views
I should have put "debate" in quotes. It's about four sentences long.
08/04/2010 10:32:43 PM
- 875 Views
More conversation on Snape.
07/04/2010 06:01:37 PM
- 1183 Views
His death wasn't very spectacular, but he did play an essential role...
07/04/2010 06:45:58 PM
- 1072 Views
Brief comments on Magic, Dumbledore, and The Epilogue.
07/04/2010 07:13:55 AM
- 1227 Views
Re: Brief comments on Magic, Dumbledore, and The Epilogue.
07/04/2010 06:09:20 PM
- 1077 Views
The movies are even worse about this.
07/04/2010 06:15:35 PM
- 957 Views
Death doesn't actually happen in slow-motion fit for the cinema screen.
08/04/2010 07:24:31 AM
- 967 Views
Re: Death doesn't actually happen in slow-motion fit for the cinema screen.
08/04/2010 03:27:09 PM
- 939 Views
Harry Potter and Star Wars have two radically different approaches to this
07/04/2010 06:13:25 PM
- 1141 Views
When my son asked for his own set of Harry Potter books,
07/04/2010 10:26:37 PM
- 977 Views
This is assuming of course...
07/04/2010 11:00:15 PM
- 1031 Views
I was most irritated by the ironic names
08/04/2010 05:38:59 AM
- 1056 Views
Re: I was most irritated by the ironic names
08/04/2010 10:07:40 PM
- 1339 Views
Exactly - it's not as obvious if you're a kid, then it seems clever and it's fun to decode.
09/04/2010 01:04:11 AM
- 1007 Views