Active Users:1161 Time:23/11/2024 06:20:47 AM
Really? Jeordam Send a noteboard - 07/04/2010 05:41:46 PM
The reason why the first books seem simplistic and the last books so dense is because JKR intentionally wrote it for the development of her audience. In the first book, a young child really wouldn't understand what's so bad about living under the stairs, it probably seems like oodles of fun to them. Looking back, as you did, they would realize the importance of what Harry endured. But as the audience gets older, JKR's writing becomes more advanced, as it should. I don't know about you, but I definitely would have stopped reading if the difficulty remained at an elementary level. To me, its not simplistic but brilliant, as Harry would say.


I didn't see it so much as gearing it for her target reader, as that was her writing style at the time. Like anyone, they get better at their job as they get more experience. I was seeing the whole thing as a literary example of the author's progression as a writter. But I would have probably tuned out and left the series if it stayed that simple. As it was, the first few books were such easy reads, that I would fly through them. And I am certainly not a fast reader.

~Jeordam
ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Reply to message
Harry Potter (the entire series) - 06/04/2010 11:00:07 PM 1692 Views
Re: Harry Potter (the entire series) - 06/04/2010 11:29:49 PM 981 Views
Really? - 07/04/2010 05:41:46 PM 1018 Views
I honestly think it's a combination of the two - 07/04/2010 05:55:18 PM 904 Views
I'll give you that.... - 07/04/2010 06:11:27 PM 925 Views
Yeah, I believe she's explicitly said she did that on purpose - 10/04/2010 08:24:47 PM 844 Views
Um...you forgot a book. - 06/04/2010 11:37:27 PM 948 Views
My bad...much thanks for reminding me. - 07/04/2010 05:43:53 PM 919 Views
Re: Harry Potter (the entire series) - 07/04/2010 12:26:22 AM 1237 Views
I get where you're coming from - 07/04/2010 06:19:13 PM 1026 Views
That's kind of the point though... - 07/04/2010 08:44:26 PM 969 Views
This is how I see it too - 08/04/2010 12:43:03 AM 1084 Views
just a comment about your rich=bad - 08/04/2010 02:05:32 AM 1039 Views
Re: just a comment about your rich=bad - 08/04/2010 05:58:13 PM 1054 Views
it was a bit black and white... - 08/04/2010 08:48:05 PM 842 Views
I agree with many of your points. - 07/04/2010 12:44:31 AM 1132 Views
I have to dispute the concept of going "too far." - 07/04/2010 06:32:47 AM 886 Views
Hm, I don't know. - 07/04/2010 11:08:12 AM 970 Views
I agree entirely about Snape *NM* - 07/04/2010 11:50:00 AM 422 Views
More conversation on Snape. - 07/04/2010 06:01:37 PM 1183 Views
Brief comments on Magic, Dumbledore, and The Epilogue. - 07/04/2010 07:13:55 AM 1227 Views
Re: Brief comments on Magic, Dumbledore, and The Epilogue. - 07/04/2010 06:09:20 PM 1077 Views
The movies are even worse about this. - 07/04/2010 06:15:35 PM 957 Views
Hmmm.... - 07/04/2010 06:21:40 PM 947 Views
Oh, that's definitely why they did it - 09/04/2010 06:44:50 AM 1275 Views
how many high school relationships... - 08/04/2010 02:13:48 AM 932 Views
Re: Brief comments on Magic, Dumbledore, and The Epilogue. - 08/04/2010 03:25:38 PM 1058 Views
Harry Potter and Star Wars have two radically different approaches to this - 07/04/2010 06:13:25 PM 1141 Views
When my son asked for his own set of Harry Potter books, - 07/04/2010 10:26:37 PM 977 Views
This is assuming of course... - 07/04/2010 11:00:15 PM 1031 Views
yes, that's where parenting gets "complicated" - 08/04/2010 02:16:06 AM 952 Views
You are taking this a bit extreme I feel. - 08/04/2010 08:51:34 AM 893 Views
I agree. *NM* - 08/04/2010 06:11:06 PM 369 Views
Re: This is assuming of course... - 08/04/2010 03:30:33 PM 1081 Views
I am the same way with a few books. - 08/04/2010 08:05:04 PM 925 Views
I was most irritated by the ironic names - 08/04/2010 05:38:59 AM 1056 Views
Re: I was most irritated by the ironic names - 08/04/2010 10:07:40 PM 1339 Views

Reply to Message