Active Users:426 Time:04/04/2025 07:06:46 PM
Yes. Cockatiel of Doom Send a noteboard - 17/03/2010 05:01:31 PM

The Ackroyd book, wasn't it?


It was.

I haven't read Bayard's take on that.


He does a similar thing. Murderer as named in the story is not actual murderer, etc. I thought it was fun, even if it was hard to take seriously.


He loses me when he start talking about independent action from characters and deep animosity on the part of the author, but his theory otherwise is sound.


I had trouble with the whole "author does not know what his characters are really doing" type of thing. Bit odd. But interesting all the same.
Taking a break from being Ella

Reply to message
Unreliable narrators: yay or nay? Or neigh? And if so, and you are a horse, how are you typing? - 12/03/2010 05:20:09 AM 840 Views
Re: Unreliable narrators: yay or nay? Or neigh? And if so, and you are a horse, how are you typing? - 12/03/2010 09:12:23 AM 658 Views
I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 12/03/2010 11:55:09 PM 584 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 14/03/2010 10:56:54 AM 655 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 16/03/2010 10:37:35 PM 630 Views
Re: I enjoyed reading the Bayard. - 16/03/2010 10:39:13 PM 612 Views
Yes. - 17/03/2010 05:01:31 PM 649 Views
Re: Yes. - 17/03/2010 07:53:38 PM 538 Views
I don't mind either way. - 12/03/2010 10:18:03 AM 639 Views
Your face is an unreliable horse! - 12/03/2010 10:25:32 AM 642 Views
I think it's fairly logical that genre fiction doesn't employ it as often. - 12/03/2010 01:21:06 PM 805 Views
Well, isn't Erikson notable for his unreliable POVs? - 14/03/2010 12:57:25 AM 636 Views
Hm. Yeigh? - 12/03/2010 05:15:41 PM 707 Views
I like it when they are well written - 15/03/2010 08:44:02 AM 851 Views
Like anything else it is good when done right - 15/03/2010 10:32:48 PM 721 Views
I think because of our cynical nature - 19/03/2010 06:58:05 AM 609 Views

Reply to Message