Pasternak had originally wanted to call the novel There Will Be No Death but changed the title. However, the original title expresses at once the way in which the novel addresses utopian ideas and the author's religious beliefs.
It's not just an anti-utopian novel, though. There's a love story (something that the movie brought to the forefront), allegories to real people and ideas and poetry.
Rather than breaking the discussion down into smaller units, I'd like to just ask anyone who read the novel to express their initial thoughts (what they liked, what they didn't, etc.) and ask questions about parts that didn't seem to make sense or which they found problematic, and we can let the discussion go from there. Having read a lot of the literary criticism surrounding the book, it may be that I am able to at least say what people think certain things meant. Then again, I may not.
It's not just an anti-utopian novel, though. There's a love story (something that the movie brought to the forefront), allegories to real people and ideas and poetry.
Rather than breaking the discussion down into smaller units, I'd like to just ask anyone who read the novel to express their initial thoughts (what they liked, what they didn't, etc.) and ask questions about parts that didn't seem to make sense or which they found problematic, and we can let the discussion go from there. Having read a lot of the literary criticism surrounding the book, it may be that I am able to at least say what people think certain things meant. Then again, I may not.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
This message last edited by Rebekah on 27/03/2010 at 10:47:27 AM
So, let's talk about Doctor Zhivago.
15/03/2010 12:51:09 PM
- 1622 Views
I liked it a lot.
15/03/2010 03:24:34 PM
- 890 Views
I mostly agree with your points, but I'm not sure Zhivago was ever disillusioned with revolution.
15/03/2010 09:19:54 PM
- 819 Views
Re: I mostly agree with your points, but I'm not sure Zhivago was ever disillusioned with revolution
15/03/2010 09:57:29 PM
- 925 Views
Yes, it's the Soviet state, not the revolution, that he hates.
15/03/2010 11:16:29 PM
- 759 Views
There will be more later. Much more. So lets start at the beginning.
15/03/2010 04:22:15 PM
- 808 Views
... I'm clearly lacking in braincells.
15/03/2010 05:03:35 PM
- 909 Views
... yes, you moved to scotland? *NM*
15/03/2010 05:42:21 PM
- 345 Views
I didn't notice the Anna Karenina connection. That's a good point.
15/03/2010 09:26:41 PM
- 842 Views
Yes. Perhaps we should tell the non-Russian speakers/readers that the name of the protagonist,
15/03/2010 10:22:39 PM
- 945 Views
Zhivago is the Church Slavonic genitive singular of живой (zhivoi), "living"
15/03/2010 11:18:23 PM
- 794 Views
I thought this was a great read, and I'm sure I've missed a lot, which will make a reread good too.
15/03/2010 05:16:19 PM
- 940 Views
On balance, there IS a love story. Just not quite the one that most people think.
15/03/2010 09:34:20 PM
- 856 Views
I noticed that as well
15/03/2010 09:42:04 PM
- 927 Views
Yes. This is what I was going to say, just not as articulately.
*NM*
15/03/2010 10:12:33 PM
- 323 Views

My initial thoughts
15/03/2010 06:02:21 PM
- 893 Views
Re: My initial thoughts
15/03/2010 08:54:15 PM
- 816 Views
There appears to be a lull, so some background - How many of you have read anything about
15/03/2010 08:19:07 PM
- 819 Views
I've read bits & pieces.
15/03/2010 08:33:41 PM
- 865 Views
Ok, since you're interested, here is some "light" reading for you. Approach with caution.
15/03/2010 08:47:42 PM
- 979 Views
Re: Ok, since you're interested, here is some "light" reading for you. Approach with caution.
15/03/2010 11:05:22 PM
- 862 Views
Thank you for calling it "light" reading. The quotation marks were comforting.
17/03/2010 09:56:26 AM
- 790 Views
I will read and respond to this when I remember to bring my glasses home from work! *NM*
17/03/2010 06:14:31 PM
- 321 Views
Fiction or non-fiction?
15/03/2010 09:21:04 PM
- 987 Views
Familiar with the history, though I've never exhaustively studied the time period.
16/03/2010 02:20:23 PM
- 892 Views
Why would you consider this a classic? What made it so good or profound for (plural) you?
16/03/2010 11:19:23 PM
- 837 Views
Put a question mark at the end of the first sentence and read my response. *NM*
17/03/2010 12:09:58 AM
- 307 Views
Some questions.
19/03/2010 08:27:38 AM
- 792 Views
As an addendum to what Greg wrote:
19/03/2010 05:56:56 PM
- 844 Views
The Possessed: Adventures with Russian Books and the People Who Read Them
21/03/2010 05:34:03 PM
- 886 Views
It looks a bit strained to me.
22/03/2010 03:28:34 AM
- 778 Views
So far the reviews are pretty glowing, as are the Amazon reviewers.
22/03/2010 01:44:19 PM
- 879 Views
In other news, I read about 100 pages of The Island at the Center of the World.
22/03/2010 03:48:47 PM
- 821 Views
I finished it last night - the last 100+ pages rather fast, considering how long the whole took.
21/04/2010 01:00:50 AM
- 640 Views