Active Users:1137 Time:22/11/2024 07:25:43 PM
Re: I'm going to be very unkind and possibly factually wrong here, since it has been a while. Danae al'Thor Send a noteboard - 14/02/2010 05:52:52 PM
But I am not sure Stephanie Meyer, as a writer, has a purpose for positively-written women or men who do not love.

I don't mean that she sees them only as hangers-on to male protagonists, but I've read these, and I've read her The Host, and all the time it seems to me that - amongst other things that make me wonder if I am a feminazi after all - the greatest passion she is able to characters with (male or female) is love. Romantic love especially.

Bella may have been a good character. but she was never allowed to have her very own plot. If you get what I mean? All of her plot was provided to her by other people, usually male, or male-accessed. These males were usually in love with her. This is a girl who has never really been alone, or sought something entirely for herself as an end that stands independently of other relationships not despite or inspite them but just of itself.

http://coolingpearls.wordpress.com/
http://uncategoricallyroh.wordpress.com/
http://whaq.blogspot.com/
~Roh
This message last edited by Danae al'Thor on 14/02/2010 at 05:53:46 PM
Reply to message
As I don't believe we've actually had a review of this yet... Stephenie Meyer's Twilight series. - 14/02/2010 04:08:51 PM 1386 Views
I think the series is codswallop...and that it DID have potential - 14/02/2010 04:59:56 PM 771 Views
As I said, the second book is better in some regards thanks to that. - 14/02/2010 05:06:29 PM 851 Views
I normally would agree with you - 14/02/2010 06:05:36 PM 702 Views
Re: I normally would agree with you - 15/02/2010 10:10:01 PM 644 Views
Re: Hey, I liked the Backstreet Boys. They sang me into puberty! - 14/02/2010 05:53:36 PM 641 Views
Re: I'm going to be very unkind and possibly factually wrong here, since it has been a while. - 14/02/2010 05:52:52 PM 769 Views
Yeah, absolutely true (spoilers). - 14/02/2010 06:14:58 PM 768 Views
maybe not anti-feminist... - 14/02/2010 06:21:44 PM 850 Views
Re: I think it gets labelled antifeminist because, well, it's Bella, the heroine, and she's so young - 14/02/2010 06:26:37 PM 938 Views
I love your point about the other "Strong women" - 14/02/2010 06:43:05 PM 744 Views
Re: What is LDS? *NM* - 14/02/2010 06:44:36 PM 298 Views
Probably, but that doesn't make them right. - 14/02/2010 07:11:19 PM 904 Views
Re: The point I was trying to make there, to some extent... - 14/02/2010 07:20:36 PM 683 Views
precisely - 14/02/2010 06:17:18 PM 695 Views
They lost me with twinkly vampires *NM* - 14/02/2010 09:22:01 PM 405 Views
I think it could have been sold better - 14/02/2010 09:35:07 PM 676 Views
Vampires should be tragic at best monsters at worst - 15/02/2010 04:58:15 PM 701 Views
I thought that was strange too - 15/02/2010 09:19:26 PM 710 Views
I think I would rather just eat people then be stuck in high school forever - 16/02/2010 09:22:07 PM 734 Views
You just had to do it, didn't you? *possible spoiler* - 15/02/2010 01:57:29 AM 1040 Views
yes *spoilers* - 15/02/2010 02:02:27 AM 781 Views
You haven't even read that book! *NM* - 15/02/2010 10:50:49 AM 289 Views
I've read more about it than I've cared to. *NM* - 15/02/2010 09:20:07 PM 277 Views
Yeah. It's one of those things that sound worse out of context than they are in the book itself... - 15/02/2010 10:57:47 AM 750 Views
Re: Monster Demon Baby! - 15/02/2010 12:56:39 PM 739 Views
Wow, dude. Just. Wow. *NM* - 16/02/2010 02:29:31 AM 281 Views
Great way to label this series... - 26/02/2010 07:40:47 PM 814 Views
I read a lot of PNR (paranormal romance for you book snobs out there) and thus have read these too. - 15/02/2010 09:55:54 PM 729 Views
I totally agree about book four. - 15/02/2010 10:02:43 PM 661 Views
Mormon fantasy...haha - 15/02/2010 10:06:58 PM 1139 Views
*lmao* There are gay men who like Edward? - 15/02/2010 10:12:37 PM 852 Views
Re: *lmao* There are gay men who like Edward? - 15/02/2010 10:16:32 PM 736 Views

Reply to Message