Active Users:615 Time:25/11/2024 04:10:09 PM
thats a big part of it kcf Send a noteboard - 01/02/2010 09:09:15 PM
They're not being open because they want their customers to be part of the process, they're being open so they can say "look, this evil publisher is trying to make you pay more for your books!" in order to get Macmillan to back down.


This is definately a big part of it. I find it intersting that it failed so badly (as John Scali lays out very well in his post that I mention above). It's also intersting that Amazon's stock fell 7% today - how much this is due to the the iPad, how much is due to caving in the end to Macmillan, and how much is due to them screwing up so publically is an open question.

But it's also the last straw in a series of issues that I have with Amazon.
Need a good book to read? Visit Neth Space - a SFF review and discussion blog.

http://nethspace.blogspot.com/
Reply to message
Amazon Accepts Macmillan’s Demand for Higher E-Book Prices - 01/02/2010 04:21:35 PM 1337 Views
Amazon lost me as a customer over all this *NM* - 01/02/2010 05:52:53 PM 390 Views
Why's that? - 01/02/2010 06:55:35 PM 947 Views
I sum it up here - 01/02/2010 08:42:02 PM 1211 Views
That's an interesting point. And I have an opposite reaction. - 01/02/2010 08:56:16 PM 795 Views
I like that they are public - I dislike that they affect the public so directly - 01/02/2010 08:59:41 PM 964 Views
To each his own. I come away with the opposite reaction and like Amazon even more. - 01/02/2010 09:35:10 PM 711 Views
I agree with you. I like what Amazon did. - 02/02/2010 12:45:10 AM 846 Views
I think his complaint is that he feels Amazon is using public opinion to pressure suppliers. - 01/02/2010 09:04:16 PM 693 Views
thats a big part of it - 01/02/2010 09:09:15 PM 1060 Views
It's a good tactic. I would have done the same thing. *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:36:31 PM 381 Views
Is it though - Amazon's stock is way down today. Seems the tactic failed *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:53:06 PM 366 Views
Apple stocks have gone down on days after major announcements too. - 01/02/2010 10:04:04 PM 669 Views
agreed - short term doesn't mean much *NM* - 01/02/2010 10:08:01 PM 358 Views
Still, your overall point stands. - 01/02/2010 11:10:25 PM 682 Views
Macmillan will lose out when people like myself choose to find the book elsewhere. - 01/02/2010 06:46:10 PM 681 Views
How easy is it to find books now? - 01/02/2010 06:53:43 PM 635 Views
Pretty easily, actually. - 01/02/2010 07:07:11 PM 1063 Views
That's excellent. - 01/02/2010 08:19:55 PM 852 Views
Screens are good. - 01/02/2010 08:50:08 PM 896 Views
Two words: Leather cover. - 01/02/2010 08:54:37 PM 742 Views
Unless you like a lot of old books, or have fairly eclectic tastes, you should be all set. - 01/02/2010 07:11:30 PM 1087 Views
If you do like a lot of old books - 01/02/2010 07:16:20 PM 730 Views
Yep, definitely true. I wasn't thinking quite that old, though. - 01/02/2010 07:24:49 PM 828 Views
$12.99 to $14.99 for a fiction ebook is ridiculous. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:44:20 PM 430 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:46:33 PM 336 Views
Then again, it's half the price of a print version, for essentially the same product / experience. - 01/02/2010 07:50:29 PM 671 Views
That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:24:08 PM 696 Views
Re: That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:55:35 PM 904 Views
Because, as Aemon says, that's how price discrimination works. - 01/02/2010 11:31:14 PM 651 Views
Not really. I buy new hardcover releases at Borders for around 18 to 20. - 02/02/2010 12:34:08 AM 833 Views
I don't know about that. - 01/02/2010 08:21:05 PM 723 Views
not really, i buy brand new paperbacks for 6.99 *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:21:16 AM 324 Views
Mass markets, yeah. - 02/02/2010 12:19:25 PM 691 Views
That is bananas. - 01/02/2010 07:46:28 PM 689 Views
"Most newly released..." - 01/02/2010 07:55:19 PM 916 Views
People pay that sort of money for DVd and more for Blue Ray - 01/02/2010 08:00:47 PM 715 Views
Physical copy is rather important in that case, you know... at least to me. - 01/02/2010 08:54:05 PM 858 Views
I was with you till that last sentence. - 01/02/2010 08:58:58 PM 932 Views
I really don't think it is that different - 01/02/2010 10:01:20 PM 708 Views
If you have issues with eBook pricing, read this link - 01/02/2010 08:46:47 PM 1045 Views
He makes good points... - 01/02/2010 11:37:22 PM 698 Views
I am unimpressed by his arguments. - 02/02/2010 01:06:03 AM 716 Views
Good for MacMillan. I'll cheer on anyone who takes a stab against e-books. - 02/02/2010 04:00:05 AM 779 Views
Whaaa? - 02/02/2010 04:08:50 AM 733 Views
Yes, of course. - 02/02/2010 04:33:13 AM 829 Views
In ten years you'll have an ebook reader. - 02/02/2010 05:34:57 AM 851 Views
I know. That's the problem. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:56:32 PM 362 Views
The lower prices, the increased profit, or the ecological benefit? *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:17:13 PM 307 Views
The gradual loss of physical books. *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:32:39 PM 313 Views
Mmm. I detect an illogical argument. - 02/02/2010 05:35:14 PM 632 Views
Obviously they won't disappear completely, or even that fast. - 02/02/2010 11:04:47 PM 685 Views
Why not? It'll spur the growth of used book stores. *NM* - 03/02/2010 01:29:56 AM 301 Views
It will increase the number of books available - 02/02/2010 01:55:05 PM 847 Views
One apt analogy is the widespread use of recording tools like Pro Tools. - 02/02/2010 08:07:22 PM 826 Views
There are already comapnies offering editng services - 02/02/2010 10:30:28 PM 656 Views
Uh, so what you want to dictate is the medium by which people read? You have no right. - 02/02/2010 08:01:09 PM 789 Views
And again let me add that it's not necessarily one or the other. - 02/02/2010 10:09:20 PM 628 Views
That would be awesome. - 02/02/2010 11:02:42 PM 625 Views
Obviously I'm not dictating anything. I'm stating my view. - 02/02/2010 11:01:41 PM 909 Views
Good Lord! *NM* - 02/02/2010 07:58:03 PM 308 Views

Reply to Message