Maybe I'm missing something here. How in the hell is 14.50 for an e-book even close to good value? Paperbacks are less than that and they have to be physically printed.
Madness. I'd buy a kindle in a heartbeat, IF the prices weren't so clearly insane.
Elaine
Irish Honey
Irish Honey
Amazon Accepts Macmillan’s Demand for Higher E-Book Prices
01/02/2010 04:21:35 PM
- 1335 Views
Amazon lost me as a customer over all this *NM*
01/02/2010 05:52:53 PM
- 389 Views
Why's that?
01/02/2010 06:55:35 PM
- 946 Views
I sum it up here
01/02/2010 08:42:02 PM
- 1211 Views
That's an interesting point. And I have an opposite reaction.
01/02/2010 08:56:16 PM
- 795 Views
I like that they are public - I dislike that they affect the public so directly
01/02/2010 08:59:41 PM
- 963 Views
To each his own. I come away with the opposite reaction and like Amazon even more.
01/02/2010 09:35:10 PM
- 708 Views
I think his complaint is that he feels Amazon is using public opinion to pressure suppliers.
01/02/2010 09:04:16 PM
- 693 Views
It's a good tactic. I would have done the same thing. *NM*
01/02/2010 09:36:31 PM
- 381 Views
Is it though - Amazon's stock is way down today. Seems the tactic failed *NM*
01/02/2010 09:53:06 PM
- 365 Views
Apple stocks have gone down on days after major announcements too.
01/02/2010 10:04:04 PM
- 669 Views
agreed - short term doesn't mean much *NM*
01/02/2010 10:08:01 PM
- 357 Views
Macmillan will lose out when people like myself choose to find the book elsewhere.
01/02/2010 06:46:10 PM
- 680 Views
How easy is it to find books now?
01/02/2010 06:53:43 PM
- 634 Views
Pretty easily, actually.
01/02/2010 07:07:11 PM
- 1059 Views
That's excellent.
01/02/2010 08:19:55 PM
- 852 Views
Screens are good.
01/02/2010 08:50:08 PM
- 895 Views
Two words: Leather cover.
01/02/2010 08:54:37 PM
- 742 Views
True, I do remember liking the cover. It's much nicer than what comes with the Sony.
01/02/2010 09:02:56 PM
- 911 Views
Unless you like a lot of old books, or have fairly eclectic tastes, you should be all set.
01/02/2010 07:11:30 PM
- 1086 Views
$12.99 to $14.99 for a fiction ebook is ridiculous. *NM*
01/02/2010 07:44:20 PM
- 430 Views
Then again, it's half the price of a print version, for essentially the same product / experience.
01/02/2010 07:50:29 PM
- 670 Views
Not really. I buy new hardcover releases at Borders for around 18 to 20.
02/02/2010 12:34:08 AM
- 831 Views
I don't know about that.
01/02/2010 08:21:05 PM
- 723 Views
That is bananas.
01/02/2010 07:46:28 PM
- 688 Views
People pay that sort of money for DVd and more for Blue Ray
01/02/2010 08:00:47 PM
- 713 Views
Physical copy is rather important in that case, you know... at least to me.
01/02/2010 08:54:05 PM
- 858 Views
Good for MacMillan. I'll cheer on anyone who takes a stab against e-books.
02/02/2010 04:00:05 AM
- 779 Views
Whaaa?
02/02/2010 04:08:50 AM
- 730 Views
Yes, of course.
02/02/2010 04:33:13 AM
- 827 Views
In ten years you'll have an ebook reader.
02/02/2010 05:34:57 AM
- 851 Views
I know. That's the problem. *NM*
02/02/2010 12:56:32 PM
- 362 Views
Oh, hush. Go sit in the corner and listen to your 8-track while the rest of us enjoy The Future. *NM*
02/02/2010 02:37:33 PM
- 333 Views
The lower prices, the increased profit, or the ecological benefit? *NM*
02/02/2010 05:17:13 PM
- 307 Views
The gradual loss of physical books. *NM*
02/02/2010 05:32:39 PM
- 313 Views
Mmm. I detect an illogical argument.
02/02/2010 05:35:14 PM
- 631 Views
It will increase the number of books available
02/02/2010 01:55:05 PM
- 846 Views
One apt analogy is the widespread use of recording tools like Pro Tools.
02/02/2010 08:07:22 PM
- 824 Views
Uh, so what you want to dictate is the medium by which people read? You have no right.
02/02/2010 08:01:09 PM
- 787 Views