He would not have known the book would be ruined by water. He thought he was being buried.
Tom Send a noteboard - 27/01/2010 02:15:02 PM
The Count was just selfish. He didn't know he was going into the water. He thought he would be buried, and he didn't take it or even think about it. He didn't care.
When he returned, the book was an afterthought, if that. The guard showed it to him and then he became "overjoyed" or whatever it was Dumas said. However, he didn't go looking for the book. He just had the dumb luck to have it handed to him.
When he returned, the book was an afterthought, if that. The guard showed it to him and then he became "overjoyed" or whatever it was Dumas said. However, he didn't go looking for the book. He just had the dumb luck to have it handed to him.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas - Book Club now open!
- 25/01/2010 10:54:37 PM
2512 Views
Les characters.
- 25/01/2010 10:56:23 PM
1371 Views
Why does the book have enduring appeal?
- 25/01/2010 10:57:37 PM
1363 Views
Or rather, does this book share any traits in common with pornography?
- 25/01/2010 11:14:01 PM
1464 Views
I think the revenge plot is actually fairly weak.
- 26/01/2010 03:43:04 AM
1395 Views
Re: I think the revenge plot is actually fairly weak.
- 26/01/2010 11:12:19 AM
1446 Views
In that case, the "release" is quite unsatisfying.
- 27/01/2010 01:42:28 PM
1544 Views
Which is precisely part of what makes the book interesting
- 27/01/2010 02:06:58 PM
1434 Views
He would not have known the book would be ruined by water. He thought he was being buried.
- 27/01/2010 02:15:02 PM
1347 Views
Oh, and your point on revenge - that's just reading too much into the text.
- 27/01/2010 02:16:05 PM
1266 Views
There is no such thing
- 27/01/2010 02:18:46 PM
1318 Views
I fundamentally disagree with your post-modern take on the novel.
- 27/01/2010 02:25:25 PM
1371 Views
Re: Which is precisely part of what makes the book interesting
- 27/01/2010 03:40:36 PM
1326 Views
Maybe it's of the same importance as the Lost Symbol.
- 27/01/2010 03:44:55 PM
1387 Views
I think one important question to ask is...
- 26/01/2010 12:00:17 AM
1423 Views
I like it, but it is purely on the adventure story level, and I've read the unabridged version.
- 26/01/2010 12:03:01 AM
1275 Views
I'm fairly certain I read the unabridged version. It was 1500 pages. *NM*
- 26/01/2010 02:36:10 AM
701 Views
I have read the abridged version a couple of times. I am reading the unabridged version this time.
- 26/01/2010 03:25:50 AM
1363 Views
I have read both
- 27/01/2010 01:37:00 AM
1453 Views
I actually didn't mean the people here on the site so much as readers in general.
- 27/01/2010 01:44:46 AM
1435 Views
Re: I actually didn't mean the people here on the site so much as readers in general.
- 27/01/2010 01:48:11 AM
1362 Views
Re: I got here too late, so I offer Umberto Eco's thoughts on the matter:
- 22/02/2010 06:59:13 PM
1562 Views
The book was very childish.
- 26/01/2010 03:05:01 AM
1480 Views
Granted, The Master and Margarita is also very much a fantasy book. *NM*
- 26/01/2010 03:07:45 AM
706 Views
No, it really isn't.
- 26/01/2010 03:10:08 AM
1445 Views
You know, this is a problem.
- 26/01/2010 03:43:14 AM
1415 Views
Thank God, I've never even heard of "Skol". Popov, yes, but Skol?
- 26/01/2010 03:49:08 AM
1411 Views
I've not tried it, but every time I go into liquor stores, it sits on the bottom shelf.
- 26/01/2010 03:57:03 AM
1307 Views
There's really nothing I can say to this that Greg didn't just say above.
- 26/01/2010 06:32:02 AM
1479 Views
Re: No, it really isn't.
- 26/01/2010 10:57:19 AM
1346 Views
Having Camilla concur with me on literary matters is very encouraging. 
- 26/01/2010 01:37:23 PM
1410 Views
- 26/01/2010 01:37:23 PM
1410 Views
I do not agree with your complete dismissal of The Count of Monte Cristo, though
- 26/01/2010 04:58:58 PM
1370 Views
You make some rather odd claims here, Tom
- 27/01/2010 12:43:41 AM
1446 Views
My claims are far from odd. In fact, they're quite common.
- 27/01/2010 01:57:41 AM
1388 Views
In some circles; in others, they're rather antiquated nowadays
- 27/01/2010 02:21:03 AM
1334 Views
If you were trying to write literature, wouldn't the label sting for you?
- 27/01/2010 01:25:14 PM
1391 Views
I think it's easier to think of stories fitting into genre(s) than to think the same of authors
- 27/01/2010 02:40:29 PM
1450 Views
Allow me to clarify: I'm talking about authors' reactions to their books being so labelled.
- 27/01/2010 03:08:47 PM
1493 Views
But yet their reactions vary widely
- 27/01/2010 11:33:25 PM
1375 Views
My fundamental premise is that genre has the most utility when applied to derivative fiction.
- 28/01/2010 09:39:17 PM
1338 Views
And yet that term is mostly used as a non-loaded term that doesn't attempt to ascribe quality levels
- 29/01/2010 02:49:20 AM
1275 Views
I like my definition of science fiction better than the one you quoted.
- 29/01/2010 05:16:36 AM
1336 Views
I think estrangement is a key element, though
- 30/01/2010 11:00:19 PM
1303 Views
I don't think estrangement is a necessary element.
- 30/01/2010 11:47:07 PM
1509 Views
I mean it as a literary effect, that of creating a distance between text and reader
- 31/01/2010 12:03:34 AM
1326 Views
Even if that's the meaning, I still disagree.
- 03/02/2010 12:49:58 AM
1310 Views
Depends on how you view SF, I suppose
- 03/02/2010 04:20:56 AM
1182 Views
I thought that was what we were mulling over
- 03/02/2010 04:38:35 AM
1309 Views
Your unscientific anecdotal evidence sounds very odd to me.
- 28/01/2010 12:15:10 AM
1379 Views
It might. I'm not purporting to speak for all of humanity (at least on this point). 
- 28/01/2010 09:43:40 PM
1434 Views
- 28/01/2010 09:43:40 PM
1434 Views
approve of this message.
So, what you're saying is that watching the 2002 movie was sufficient? Good! *NM*
- 26/01/2010 06:34:53 AM
671 Views
*NM*
- 26/01/2010 06:34:53 AM
671 Views
I'm not through it quite yet, but I do have a question
- 26/01/2010 12:24:14 PM
1328 Views
Wait...you VOTED for this book?
- 26/01/2010 01:41:00 PM
1376 Views
I honestly can't remember.
- 26/01/2010 01:55:39 PM
1341 Views
Doctor Zhivago is one of the best novels ever written.
- 26/01/2010 02:12:35 PM
1356 Views
Right, so now we all know that if we'd just listen to me more often, the world would be better.
- 26/01/2010 02:20:56 PM
1350 Views
The problem was that the suggestions were generally not that good.
- 26/01/2010 02:32:50 PM
1402 Views
You really are ignornant of what A.S. Byatt writes, aren't you?
- 27/01/2010 12:51:00 AM
1376 Views
- 27/01/2010 12:51:00 AM
1376 Views
Oh, I fucking hate epistolary novels. Thank you for warning me.
- 27/01/2010 02:00:34 AM
1279 Views
It's funny because I think it's a question of taste level.
- 26/01/2010 02:32:08 PM
1429 Views
Curious George is a tale of many layers, as told by Werner Herzog
- 26/01/2010 02:34:27 PM
1482 Views
On what basis?
- 26/01/2010 02:51:40 PM
1434 Views
It's a children's book. Get over it. Democracy failed.
- 26/01/2010 02:55:03 PM
1428 Views
Usually does, when those who know better keep silent.
- 26/01/2010 02:57:54 PM
1322 Views
Regarding comfort zones
- 26/01/2010 05:08:50 PM
1444 Views
Camilla, let's be honest here...
- 26/01/2010 05:40:08 PM
1471 Views
Re: Camilla, let's be honest here...
- 26/01/2010 09:10:47 PM
1424 Views
If that's your goal, Camilla, you failed.
- 27/01/2010 01:35:52 PM
1491 Views
Possibly
- 27/01/2010 01:38:39 PM
1342 Views
I have not been ranting and raving. I've been highly critical of the book, with much justification.
- 27/01/2010 01:45:05 PM
1362 Views
Re: I've been highly critical of the book, with much justification.
- 27/01/2010 01:53:28 PM
1350 Views
I was wondering how long it would take for you to blame me and Greg.
- 27/01/2010 02:26:12 PM
1480 Views
Don't you get it? We bring this place down.
- 27/01/2010 02:42:32 PM
1320 Views
Heh heh heh. Pink cardigan-wearing suburban cul-de-sac. I like it. *NM*
- 27/01/2010 03:11:25 PM
672 Views
*NM*
- 27/01/2010 03:11:25 PM
672 Views
Re: I was wondering how long it would take for you to blame me and Greg.
- 27/01/2010 02:43:11 PM
1344 Views
While that was not the intent, that is an added bonus.
- 27/01/2010 02:48:47 PM
1339 Views
why is it a bonus?
- 27/01/2010 02:52:58 PM
1299 Views
I said see above. You should have before the thought police, Rebekah, started to delete.
- 27/01/2010 02:59:07 PM
1585 Views
Well, you wouldn't grow tired of us calling a novel shit if you chose a novel that wasn't shit.
- 27/01/2010 03:11:57 PM
1328 Views
Re: Regarding comfort zones
- 27/01/2010 11:57:03 AM
1405 Views
So. I really liked it.
- 26/01/2010 08:57:02 AM
1486 Views
Yes, fearless leader, this is where I stand.
- 26/01/2010 11:04:23 PM
1339 Views
Re: Yes, fearless leader, this is where I stand.
- 26/01/2010 11:49:03 PM
1396 Views
We were talking about this last night.
- 27/01/2010 11:14:21 AM
1472 Views
Re: We were talking about this last night.
- 27/01/2010 11:37:04 AM
1472 Views
If you do that, I'm posting on the deeper meaning of Dan Brown.
- 27/01/2010 01:46:35 PM
1443 Views
Feel free to.
- 27/01/2010 01:51:23 PM
1415 Views
Your post-modern take on the novel is shit, shit, shit.
- 27/01/2010 02:28:56 PM
1373 Views
Re: Your post-modern take on the novel is shit, shit, shit.
- 27/01/2010 02:45:41 PM
1408 Views
I'm not setting up a straw man. I'm challenging your touchy-feely approach.
- 27/01/2010 03:15:00 PM
1291 Views
My touchy-feely approach?
- 27/01/2010 05:09:04 PM
1312 Views
Yes...using passing references in the text to justify a deeper analysis.
- 27/01/2010 05:16:10 PM
1353 Views
Doesn't touchy-feely mean that it is steeped in or based on emotion?
- 27/01/2010 06:40:31 PM
1324 Views
I think between the two of you I agree more with Tom here.
- 27/01/2010 07:01:08 PM
1298 Views
Re: I think between the two of you I agree more with Tom here.
- 27/01/2010 08:29:32 PM
1387 Views
See my reply to Tom for clarification, then.
- 27/01/2010 08:57:18 PM
1436 Views
Re: See my reply to Tom for clarification, then.
- 27/01/2010 09:09:47 PM
1343 Views
Er. Whose position are you arguing - mine or yours?
- 27/01/2010 10:33:01 PM
1234 Views
- 27/01/2010 10:33:01 PM
1234 Views
Mine. Which is more complicated than a simple rejection. That is what I am saying.
- 01/02/2010 12:53:58 PM
1217 Views
Do it. I'd read that.
- 27/01/2010 01:55:23 PM
1467 Views
All righty, that's enough of that. For Tom, Greg, and... no, pretty much just you two.
- 27/01/2010 04:33:00 PM
1394 Views
I call bullshit. I have been conducting the debate in a measured fashion.
- 27/01/2010 04:50:35 PM
1351 Views
And ANOTHER THING
- 27/01/2010 05:05:17 PM
1253 Views
Not everyone has finished reading it yet *NM*
- 27/01/2010 05:12:10 PM
736 Views
Okay, so you'll get one or two stragglers in a week to a month. It changes nothing.
- 27/01/2010 05:17:51 PM
1424 Views
Re: Okay, so you'll get one or two stragglers in a week to a month. It changes nothing.
- 27/01/2010 06:41:11 PM
1371 Views
We are discussing this book. We're discussing its faults.
- 27/01/2010 07:30:49 PM
1303 Views
In the interest of discussing Dumas' intentions...
- 27/01/2010 08:03:24 PM
1475 Views
Re: We are discussing this book. We're discussing its faults.
- 27/01/2010 08:30:19 PM
1431 Views
The text doesn't warrant "close attention" any more than Dan Brown's works do.
- 27/01/2010 09:10:45 PM
1310 Views
Also, do you think a good book would have generated this level of discussion? Of course not.
- 27/01/2010 05:21:45 PM
1341 Views
What discussion?
- 27/01/2010 06:42:32 PM
1367 Views
I said that we couldn't discuss the book on its own terms.
- 27/01/2010 07:35:32 PM
1445 Views
Which I still think we can.
- 27/01/2010 08:35:35 PM
1336 Views
Perhaps you shouldn't be breaking things down at all.
- 27/01/2010 09:06:59 PM
1433 Views
Re: Perhaps you shouldn't be breaking things down at all.
- 27/01/2010 09:12:22 PM
1389 Views
I apologize if I'm part of the reason you feel ganged up on.
- 27/01/2010 10:40:36 PM
1357 Views
Re: I apologize if I'm part of the reason you feel ganged up on.
- 01/02/2010 12:56:03 PM
1279 Views
Deary me.
- 27/01/2010 05:19:58 PM
1554 Views
By "respect" do you mean that you want me to drop my debates?
- 27/01/2010 05:24:03 PM
1305 Views
Not at all.
- 27/01/2010 05:35:34 PM
1471 Views
I'm sorry as well - if I had any kind of willpower, it wouldn't have gotten that far.
- 27/01/2010 06:29:43 PM
1381 Views
On the nature of the "Book Club"
- 28/01/2010 09:23:23 PM
1227 Views
Any chance of seeing some shorter suggestions?
- 28/01/2010 10:20:59 PM
1442 Views
Yes, shorter would be good.
- 28/01/2010 10:23:28 PM
1288 Views
Well, you should have known better!
- 29/01/2010 01:29:40 AM
1338 Views
- 29/01/2010 01:29:40 AM
1338 Views
All I can say is The Master and Margarita better be one by March. WE WAS ROBBED. *NM*
- 29/01/2010 02:31:48 AM
634 Views
*NM*
- 29/01/2010 02:31:48 AM
634 Views
Well I'm late to the party
- 29/01/2010 06:21:18 AM
1269 Views
No, you're early
- 01/02/2010 01:26:10 PM
1179 Views
I still have yet to see that discussion, Camilla. *NM*
- 03/02/2010 12:46:24 AM
694 Views
Interesting way of dismissing what has already been discussed about the book
- 03/02/2010 04:22:26 AM
1432 Views
Nah, there's been discussion, here and there inbetween the fighting. *NM*
- 03/02/2010 04:39:24 PM
641 Views
*NM*
- 03/02/2010 04:39:24 PM
641 Views
An interesting quote from the book - does it jibe with your experience?
- 29/01/2010 11:23:54 PM
1349 Views