I wouldn't expect an in-depth analytical review post about a book someone didn't finish, f'rinstance. But if someone writes about how far they got, their reaction to the material they'd read, and why they didn't feel like they could/would go any further, I certainly wouldn't be upset about that.
It's the people who write stuff like "I read a hundred pages of this book, it sucks, don't read it it's awful the end" that annoy me.
It's the people who write stuff like "I read a hundred pages of this book, it sucks, don't read it it's awful the end" that annoy me.
I am made of poison.
Does it upset you when people review books that they didn't finish?
- 24/01/2010 01:24:00 PM
863 Views
I believe a good ending can completely transform a book
- 24/01/2010 02:16:45 PM
599 Views
Whereas I have a belief that forcing myself to wade...
- 24/01/2010 02:39:22 PM
588 Views
I had a hard time with the first 225 pages of LotR and Les Miserables. I was slogging.
- 24/01/2010 09:50:34 PM
647 Views
i didn't actually understand the fuss about tolkein until the balrog scene...
- 26/01/2010 03:17:34 AM
705 Views
Depends on how they review them, for the most part.
- 24/01/2010 11:52:39 PM
628 Views