Agreed that it's one of the best books from 2000. I just happen to believe that the 21st century started in 2001 

I complained about this ALL of 1999. Almost everyone thought I was crazy, apparently except Matt Stover.
“Myth is much more important and true than history. History is just journalism, and you know how reliable that is.
Joseph Campbell
Joseph Campbell
This message last edited by Jayhawk on 12/01/2010 at 03:36:56 AM
20 Best Science Fiction Books of the Decade
13/12/2009 10:16:32 PM
- 1330 Views
How can Harry Potter be there and the Dark Tower not ?
13/12/2009 11:53:10 PM
- 750 Views
I'm kinda meh on Harry Potter but at least I found it interesting enough to finish
14/12/2009 02:25:36 PM
- 691 Views
I think they put Oryx and Crake on lists like this just to spite Margaret Atwood *NM*
14/12/2009 12:10:35 AM
- 471 Views
What do you mean? *NM*
14/12/2009 01:52:01 PM
- 301 Views
She's on record as being a bit snobby about Sci-Fi and not wanting to be labelled with it *NM*
14/12/2009 02:23:46 PM
- 289 Views
I agree with her 100%. It's not Science Fiction. *NM*
15/12/2009 06:47:50 PM
- 332 Views
I don't think of books like that as Sci fi but I can see the argument that they are
16/12/2009 01:19:45 PM
- 698 Views
I'm a little surprised The Lies of Locke Lamora isn't on there, to be honest.
14/12/2009 02:35:13 AM
- 689 Views
it's fantasy. not sf even by a stretch. *NM*
14/12/2009 05:52:05 AM
- 307 Views
Am I th eonly one who always reads Ekaterina Sedia as Ekaterina Sedai?
*NM*
14/12/2009 08:52:57 PM
- 343 Views
