Alexandre Dumas is often very, very good. But his writing is usually character-focused, which I admit will make the discussion a bit difficult. I have never participated in a book club discussion before at all, so I have no idea how it will work.
Which translation are you reading?
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
The Count of Monte Cristo was a terrible choice for a book discussion.
09/01/2010 07:41:01 PM
- 1503 Views
Hey, now (copy/paste)
09/01/2010 07:48:56 PM
- 1052 Views
People should think about these things before recommending books.
09/01/2010 08:13:10 PM
- 1073 Views
Which is why I voted for Bulgakov's M & M.
09/01/2010 10:56:00 PM
- 1140 Views
I disagree slightly
09/01/2010 09:07:12 PM
- 944 Views
Well, by that standard a Jackie Collins novel is worthy of debate.
10/01/2010 01:08:04 AM
- 1000 Views
Oh, I almost forgot
10/01/2010 01:11:50 AM
- 994 Views
Ooh...I'd love to hear them!!! What did Eco say to trash Dumas? *NM*
10/01/2010 01:19:43 AM
- 376 Views
Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen
10/01/2010 01:39:28 AM
- 1060 Views
I love it. Strangely enough, though, he wrote an introduction to the book.
10/01/2010 01:54:24 AM
- 921 Views
Not really strange as Eco has long been fascinated by this book
11/01/2010 05:01:56 PM
- 949 Views
Did he mention it in his book on ugliness?
11/01/2010 05:12:55 PM
- 836 Views
Re: Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen
11/01/2010 03:49:15 PM
- 1044 Views
That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise.
11/01/2010 05:12:25 PM
- 870 Views
Re: That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise.
11/01/2010 06:22:24 PM
- 1141 Views
I agree that abridging it would not work well.
12/01/2010 04:06:26 PM
- 1022 Views
I think there are plenty of things that can be discussed.
09/01/2010 10:00:06 PM
- 1199 Views
Discussed and put to rest in 5 minutes or less, perhaps.
10/01/2010 01:17:02 AM
- 1063 Views
Depends on who you are, one would imagine.
10/01/2010 08:16:11 AM
- 1118 Views
<pretentious>Well, why should we cater to the lowest common denominator?
11/01/2010 02:17:03 AM
- 1019 Views
I'd laugh...
11/01/2010 07:21:38 PM
- 797 Views
I don't get that. Well, of course I do from Tom, but let's put him aside for this discussion.
12/01/2010 03:35:21 AM
- 1112 Views
It's frustrating though...
12/01/2010 04:18:37 AM
- 1073 Views
I think if you posted that (or something like it) people would reply to it.
12/01/2010 05:08:53 AM
- 1076 Views
Perhaps.
12/01/2010 05:26:38 AM
- 795 Views
Given the people who have read the Kushiel books, I think you'd be pleasantly surprised.
12/01/2010 05:58:33 AM
- 855 Views
You're not.
12/01/2010 02:16:09 PM
- 920 Views
Her next series sounds interesting
12/01/2010 02:20:17 PM
- 788 Views
It does, but the reviews I've seen aren't too enthusiastic.
12/01/2010 02:29:26 PM
- 829 Views
Yes, but how so?
12/01/2010 02:39:59 PM
- 928 Views
Well...
13/01/2010 07:03:08 PM
- 993 Views
Honestly...
13/01/2010 07:51:14 PM
- 971 Views
Absolutely.
14/01/2010 12:55:00 PM
- 1115 Views
Re: Absolutely.
14/01/2010 01:57:47 PM
- 943 Views
In short, not a good name for a daughter. At least not one with an interest in Classics.
15/01/2010 05:32:35 AM
- 921 Views
I'm staying far, far away from Seneca.
15/01/2010 02:01:49 PM
- 1173 Views
Ah, yes. The Apocolocyntosis. Possibly the least amusing humor ever penned. I hate Seneca. *NM*
16/01/2010 02:14:32 AM
- 353 Views
I really don't think it would.
12/01/2010 07:49:32 AM
- 989 Views
I have tried before.
12/01/2010 01:59:24 PM
- 895 Views
If it is well-written and defends the value of the book, I don't see why you shouldn't post it.
12/01/2010 05:12:58 PM
- 1069 Views
I'm quite enjoying it.
09/01/2010 10:40:30 PM
- 951 Views
A kid's book of adventure doesn't translate into a good book club discussion.
10/01/2010 01:21:11 AM
- 872 Views
I have to agree
11/01/2010 12:36:55 AM
- 1013 Views
How did you find deeper meaning (pun intended) in 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea? *NM*
11/01/2010 02:17:55 AM
- 382 Views