Active Users:483 Time:25/11/2024 09:57:56 PM
Anti the idea ? I see no evidence for this. AgentOrange Send a noteboard - 02/12/2009 09:50:37 PM
I recall one time on the old wotmania OF Larry bemoaned the fact most of the talk revolved around the TV shows. This is unavoidable because there is a higher percentage of people who've seen the same shows then those who've read the same books. Probably because there are fewer shows than books.

The same applies for Fiction and non fiction. But it doesn't mean people are aginst it. You just can't expect a lively discussion about something other than aSoIaF.
Reply to message
In Support of Other Fiction - 01/12/2009 09:06:14 PM 2070 Views
- 01/12/2009 09:22:56 PM 1140 Views
Re: - 01/12/2009 09:28:04 PM 1120 Views
Wow...we were just Santified *NM* - 03/12/2009 09:16:21 PM 563 Views
Well, let me offer a diverging view on the topic of speculative fiction. - 01/12/2009 09:46:35 PM 1046 Views
I would counter that the stripping away removes a level of reality. - 01/12/2009 10:05:28 PM 1131 Views
That's a Slippery Slope Because You Could Argue On the Same Basis That All Fiction Does That. - 01/12/2009 11:34:34 PM 1183 Views
I don't see the slippery slope, but rather, a confirmation of my original point. - 02/12/2009 01:41:24 AM 1128 Views
perhaps some university will do a study - 03/12/2009 03:55:54 PM 1086 Views
I'd like to see it - 03/12/2009 09:15:12 PM 1137 Views
I'll get to it once I finish my thesis - 03/12/2009 09:56:29 PM 1077 Views
If it looks like crap and smells like crap... - 03/12/2009 10:04:15 PM 1105 Views
I Think I'll Post a Thread on This. - 03/12/2009 06:47:05 PM 1058 Views
I'd like to see it. - 03/12/2009 09:23:07 PM 1102 Views
Regarding depth in Jordan - 03/12/2009 09:31:19 PM 1109 Views
I was thinking about that too - 03/12/2009 10:05:40 PM 1086 Views
Re: I was thinking about that too - 03/12/2009 10:09:26 PM 1178 Views
Destroying the Wheel is meaningless. - 03/12/2009 10:18:08 PM 1073 Views
Re: Destroying the Wheel is meaningless. - 03/12/2009 10:30:15 PM 1102 Views
I Totally Missed That. - 04/12/2009 10:45:56 PM 1158 Views
Re: I Totally Missed That. - 04/12/2009 10:47:59 PM 1141 Views
I Don't Believe It Cursory, But Comparative. - 04/12/2009 11:29:36 PM 1228 Views
Publication bookend Y2K? - 05/12/2009 10:36:01 AM 1151 Views
They're Thick Bookends. - 05/12/2009 06:12:06 PM 1086 Views
I'll Try to Have It Up Tomorrow Early. - 04/12/2009 11:24:18 PM 1188 Views
I like it. - 01/12/2009 10:28:48 PM 1101 Views
Thank you! - 02/12/2009 01:43:05 AM 1248 Views
I find Michel Houellebecq to be one of the most intriguing writers of our time - 01/12/2009 11:14:05 PM 1194 Views
And, in recent memory, Orwell was a first-rate writer. - 02/12/2009 01:44:29 AM 1182 Views
wait! there's somebody "dirtier" than Piers Anthony or Philip Jose Farmer??? - 03/12/2009 04:00:28 PM 1148 Views
PJF is dirty? - 04/12/2009 12:16:12 AM 1031 Views
Nice post. - 02/12/2009 12:03:09 AM 1197 Views
Perhaps you're right. - 02/12/2009 01:47:10 AM 1066 Views
In its entirety? No. - 02/12/2009 02:00:10 PM 1109 Views
I agree! - 02/12/2009 12:17:10 AM 1313 Views
Thank you! - 02/12/2009 01:50:22 AM 1019 Views
I guess I'll break my silence after almost a month and a half... - 02/12/2009 12:23:07 AM 1208 Views
Popcorn? - 02/12/2009 12:31:44 AM 1135 Views
Yes - 02/12/2009 12:39:10 AM 1178 Views
Lovecraft? - 02/12/2009 12:51:55 AM 1166 Views
Re-read what I said - 02/12/2009 12:55:08 AM 1235 Views
aahh - 02/12/2009 09:26:40 AM 1099 Views
Larry, please tell me you weren't... - 03/12/2009 04:33:32 PM 967 Views
I concur - 02/12/2009 12:27:13 AM 1090 Views
I like your framing of the issue (and Shannara is the Taco Bell of writing). - 02/12/2009 02:03:51 AM 1135 Views
Thank you - 02/12/2009 09:30:42 AM 1085 Views
more like the mom&pop greasy-spoon diner of writing *NM* - 03/12/2009 05:00:21 PM 523 Views
I'm going to put this in my sig, if you don't mind. - 02/12/2009 03:31:13 AM 1159 Views
hehehe - 02/12/2009 09:31:28 AM 1040 Views
Am i the only one who reads books for fun? - 02/12/2009 12:33:52 AM 1187 Views
There isn't necessarily a contradiction - 02/12/2009 12:38:43 AM 1120 Views
I certainly didn't read The Lost Symbol for ANY cultural, intellectual or edifying reason. - 02/12/2009 02:05:45 AM 1091 Views
it didn't come across that way - 03/12/2009 05:15:36 PM 1118 Views
Of course not. Personally, I don't touch anything other than mind candy when I'm in school, - 02/12/2009 03:29:23 AM 1059 Views
one of the things that is important to me in books/shows - 03/12/2009 05:20:29 PM 992 Views
We agree! - 03/12/2009 08:03:00 PM 1093 Views
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is a science fiction/fantasy movie. - 02/12/2009 12:54:08 AM 1154 Views
i was gonna point that out. thnks. *NM* - 02/12/2009 01:13:47 AM 472 Views
Reading only speculative literature is limiting and monotonous. - 02/12/2009 02:09:42 AM 1186 Views
I was going to say exactly that about "real" literature: monotonous and limiting. - 02/12/2009 01:57:49 PM 1087 Views
I think his point was that only SF/F wasn't good food. - 02/12/2009 02:15:29 PM 1061 Views
I would not disagree with you if you said that. - 02/12/2009 02:27:08 PM 1016 Views
Most non-speculative fiction is fluff as well though. - 03/12/2009 05:38:32 PM 1010 Views
hear hear!! I agree totally wert-man - 03/12/2009 07:20:09 PM 1079 Views
Which brings us back to my point. - 03/12/2009 08:04:24 PM 1132 Views
Actually, it is a film that does not fit neatly into one category - 02/12/2009 11:16:20 AM 1135 Views
Science Fiction is the most PERTINANT form of fiction in the world today - 02/12/2009 12:57:19 AM 1084 Views
don't get me wrong - 02/12/2009 01:28:08 AM 1116 Views
SF&F and 'real literature' are not mutually exclusive - 02/12/2009 01:19:05 AM 1077 Views
No, they are not - 02/12/2009 02:18:53 AM 1091 Views
This line is a load of bull - 03/12/2009 02:39:53 PM 1195 Views
So why don't we occasionally focus on "real" books that are technically spec fiction? - 02/12/2009 01:25:04 AM 1056 Views
Why must we limit our focus in that way? - 02/12/2009 02:20:11 AM 1047 Views
I don't see it as limiting or forcing. - 02/12/2009 03:16:07 AM 1069 Views
"Elite club" or "elitist clique"? - 02/12/2009 03:52:11 AM 1050 Views
Either way, I want in. *NM* - 02/12/2009 11:33:52 AM 566 Views
Elite club is how we midwestern rednecks refer to Elitist Clique. *chews on a piece of hay* - 02/12/2009 02:52:01 PM 1207 Views
I was born in the Midwest. - 02/12/2009 03:01:36 PM 1116 Views
I know. - 02/12/2009 03:12:05 PM 1047 Views
Green Acres in reverse, eh? - 02/12/2009 03:38:09 PM 1082 Views
lmao - 02/12/2009 06:21:17 PM 1230 Views
*piledrivers you* - 02/12/2009 06:28:02 PM 1012 Views
...! - 02/12/2009 03:17:57 PM 1064 Views
Admit it. You know what I'm talking about. - 02/12/2009 03:29:31 PM 1074 Views
Re: Admit it. You know what I'm talking about. - 02/12/2009 03:31:26 PM 1021 Views
Vermont isn't in the Midwest. - 02/12/2009 03:39:36 PM 1031 Views
Re: Vermont isn't in the Midwest. - 02/12/2009 03:42:47 PM 1064 Views
Huh! I really didn't think of you as being a masochist. - 02/12/2009 01:51:55 AM 1028 Views
Thank you! - 02/12/2009 02:21:00 AM 960 Views
Shitstorm! - 02/12/2009 03:06:59 AM 1012 Views
Heh heh heh. - 02/12/2009 03:45:40 AM 1060 Views
Read what you like to read. - 02/12/2009 04:18:53 AM 1143 Views
I'll super size you. Fine. *NM* - 02/12/2009 04:32:58 AM 534 Views
Oh noes! I'm getting word-fat! - 02/12/2009 04:59:05 AM 1066 Views
I seem to have struck a nerve. - 02/12/2009 05:20:27 AM 1099 Views
Apparently not the nerve you think, though. - 02/12/2009 06:42:02 AM 1170 Views
Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure. - 02/12/2009 02:13:10 PM 1084 Views
Re: Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure. - 02/12/2009 03:26:59 PM 1096 Views
Agreed. - 02/12/2009 03:30:50 PM 1012 Views
Re: Agreed. - 02/12/2009 03:32:06 PM 1006 Views
Re: Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure. - 02/12/2009 09:40:28 PM 1137 Views
I really did get under your skin - 02/12/2009 09:58:18 PM 1008 Views
- 02/12/2009 10:06:46 PM 1006 Views
Tom as much as you raise some great points, you are being a condescending ass. - 03/12/2009 04:26:27 AM 1064 Views
You're entitled to your opinion. I don't care. - 03/12/2009 04:51:18 AM 1045 Views
I keep replying. It's like a sickness. - 03/12/2009 05:15:28 AM 1063 Views
Your subject line reinforces my opinion. - 03/12/2009 05:31:50 AM 980 Views
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. *NM* - 03/12/2009 07:21:05 AM 517 Views
LOL! - 04/12/2009 12:21:36 AM 1022 Views
See, you just proved my point. - 04/12/2009 12:39:59 AM 1067 Views
Hm. - 02/12/2009 06:58:56 AM 1664 Views
Re-read my exact point. - 02/12/2009 02:18:20 PM 1021 Views
No. Some kind of reading is indeed essential. - 02/12/2009 02:28:22 PM 1177 Views
Somehow I get the feeling that this post hasn't caused quite as much controversy - 02/12/2009 06:53:18 AM 1172 Views
As I see it... - 02/12/2009 11:38:07 AM 1052 Views
Yep. - 02/12/2009 02:18:22 PM 1215 Views
Re: Yep. - 02/12/2009 03:35:38 PM 1077 Views
Euripides was poorly received, initially. - 02/12/2009 03:57:58 PM 983 Views
Re: Euripides was poorly received, initially. - 02/12/2009 04:00:35 PM 1013 Views
I know. - 02/12/2009 04:18:16 PM 1076 Views
Re: I know. - 02/12/2009 04:23:14 PM 1014 Views
That is why he's so good, in my opinion. - 02/12/2009 06:15:45 PM 1173 Views
All reading of fiction is a diversion by the very nature of the activity. - 02/12/2009 03:43:05 PM 1075 Views
Diversion from direct action, yes. Diversion from reality, no. - 02/12/2009 04:15:48 PM 1033 Views
I maintain that all acts of reading fiction are a diversion from reality/ the realistic - 02/12/2009 05:43:16 PM 1049 Views
It seems a regressive argument to me. - 03/12/2009 01:18:02 AM 1000 Views
You're playing a game. - 03/12/2009 03:40:14 PM 1080 Views
I like your response. *NM* - 03/12/2009 05:37:09 PM 486 Views
I fundamentally agree with much of what you're saying, but there is a distinction. - 03/12/2009 06:44:02 PM 1069 Views
Oh I concur on that distinction. - 04/12/2009 09:06:34 PM 1115 Views
Spec fic is perhaps at it's best in autocracies? - 02/12/2009 04:10:56 PM 997 Views
Bulgakov - 02/12/2009 04:25:17 PM 1052 Views
I've only read the first chapter of M&M. - 02/12/2009 04:36:09 PM 1022 Views
Re: I've only read the first chapter of M&M. - 02/12/2009 04:40:16 PM 977 Views
Not the greatest Tolkien scholar, me. - 02/12/2009 05:17:31 PM 1008 Views
Re: Not the greatest Tolkien scholar, me. - 02/12/2009 05:40:16 PM 1058 Views
I suppose. - 02/12/2009 06:26:30 PM 1059 Views
Re: I suppose. - 02/12/2009 07:25:26 PM 1065 Views
Well, I don't hold escapism in such low esteem *NM* - 02/12/2009 07:56:13 PM 527 Views
That is what I mean - 02/12/2009 08:36:02 PM 989 Views
This was something I was exploring earlier. - 02/12/2009 04:34:41 PM 1101 Views
Funny thing about the hivemind antagonist. - 02/12/2009 05:13:30 PM 1063 Views
I didn't see the zombies reading speculative fiction - 02/12/2009 05:30:26 PM 1137 Views
Oh, they prefer Clive Cussler. - 02/12/2009 06:23:42 PM 1113 Views
i think it comes more down to quality than genre. - 02/12/2009 04:55:20 PM 1078 Views
I disagree with the ultimate conclusion but agree with many of your points. - 02/12/2009 05:43:04 PM 1052 Views
the illiad is a classic - 02/12/2009 06:35:24 PM 1071 Views
There's only one "L" in Iliad - 02/12/2009 08:18:38 PM 1039 Views
Is there a safe answer to that question? *NM* - 02/12/2009 10:33:21 PM 550 Views
Maybe not. *NM* - 03/12/2009 12:59:09 AM 518 Views
It took me a few minutes to agree - 02/12/2009 07:04:59 PM 1025 Views
Well, I'm glad if you got something out of the post! - 02/12/2009 09:13:26 PM 1041 Views
Re: Well, I'm glad if you got something out of the post! - 02/12/2009 09:20:49 PM 1019 Views
I don't know. I've only read about 30 pages so far. *NM* - 02/12/2009 10:05:54 PM 548 Views
Many people have mentioned that there's quite a bit of good sff lit out there and you seem to agree. - 02/12/2009 07:33:42 PM 1147 Views
Hmmm - 02/12/2009 08:40:53 PM 1054 Views
Re: Hmmm - 02/12/2009 10:48:02 PM 1069 Views
The website is called "Read and Find Out". It doesn't specify what we're supposed to read. - 02/12/2009 08:42:19 PM 1118 Views
Anti the idea ? I see no evidence for this. - 02/12/2009 09:50:37 PM 1072 Views
Heh - 02/12/2009 09:56:30 PM 1076 Views
What do you mean ? Almost all the repliers agree with Tom - 03/12/2009 11:01:08 AM 1046 Views
Re: What do you mean ? Almost all the repliers agree with Tom - 03/12/2009 11:10:35 AM 1064 Views
I see. You don't read announcements. - 03/12/2009 11:12:04 AM 1029 Views
No, but it does bill itself as science fiction/fantasy. - 02/12/2009 10:51:41 PM 1158 Views
Yes. - 03/12/2009 12:01:30 AM 1155 Views
I think Rebekah and Camilla put it well. - 02/12/2009 10:05:24 PM 1126 Views
I think they make good points, as I said above. - 02/12/2009 10:56:55 PM 1022 Views
I agree with in principle - 02/12/2009 11:22:19 PM 1004 Views
Certainly. People are free to skip any discussion. - 03/12/2009 01:01:40 AM 1121 Views
I have a few objections. - 03/12/2009 12:24:43 AM 1089 Views
where else should we talk about it? - 03/12/2009 12:37:26 AM 1048 Views
random thoughts stole my subject line - 03/12/2009 01:56:07 AM 1090 Views
I think I could agree with a "comfort food" analogy - 03/12/2009 02:12:01 AM 1104 Views
Re: I think I could agree with a "comfort food" analogy - 03/12/2009 02:38:17 AM 1157 Views
That's it - 03/12/2009 04:02:28 AM 1163 Views
Question: is it really science fiction without one of the following: - 03/12/2009 05:13:21 AM 1099 Views
Certainly - 03/12/2009 06:13:38 AM 1145 Views
technically speaking, fantasy is classed as a sub heading under science fiction. *NM* - 03/12/2009 02:51:12 PM 449 Views
According to whom? *NM* - 03/12/2009 03:55:45 PM 575 Views
Yeah. What she asked! *NM* - 03/12/2009 09:23:55 PM 539 Views
Yes, it is but actually... - 03/12/2009 09:31:44 PM 1074 Views
Eternal Sunshine doesn't have a mad scientist. - 03/12/2009 10:09:01 PM 1000 Views
Really? - 04/12/2009 07:01:42 PM 1054 Views
But Dan Brown rocks da house!!! *NM* - 03/12/2009 02:16:47 AM 545 Views
*pumps fist* Give it up for Dan Brown! *NM* - 03/12/2009 03:58:23 AM 540 Views
That's Dan "booyah" Brown!!! Booyah!!! *NM* - 04/12/2009 02:00:56 AM 547 Views
another thing wrong with your argument - 03/12/2009 03:30:19 PM 1056 Views
Absolutely not. And, as I said before, there's only one "L" in Iliad. - 03/12/2009 06:53:35 PM 881 Views
sorry about my atrocious spelling (including the one on pertinent) - 03/12/2009 07:14:59 PM 1180 Views
No problem. On the substantive points: - 03/12/2009 08:00:33 PM 1112 Views
more importantly, which I think it being lost in all this, - 03/12/2009 08:05:27 PM 1114 Views
I'm not reading the Iliad again, once was enough - 04/12/2009 12:19:07 PM 1044 Views
Congratulations on the replies count - 03/12/2009 09:30:41 PM 1177 Views
That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree. - 03/12/2009 10:50:29 PM 1130 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree. - 04/12/2009 07:44:56 PM 1110 Views
But the objective truth of a setting can be measured. - 04/12/2009 10:37:10 PM 1037 Views
But does it make any difference in the objective value of the book? - 06/12/2009 09:35:59 AM 1199 Views
YES. - 06/12/2009 03:34:17 PM 1016 Views
NO - 07/12/2009 08:40:33 PM 1102 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree. - 04/12/2009 10:25:08 PM 1049 Views
Yes, it is worse with movies. Much worse, in fact. - 04/12/2009 10:33:18 PM 1096 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree. - 06/12/2009 09:36:11 AM 1051 Views
Maybe we're different, but I don't care for FX - 06/12/2009 01:37:53 PM 996 Views
This is not about the personal taste - 07/12/2009 08:50:34 PM 1099 Views
I've obviously missed the show here... - 04/12/2009 12:14:30 AM 1019 Views
I'm not sure that's right. This thing just keeps growing. - 04/12/2009 12:46:24 AM 1136 Views
What, your penis? - 06/12/2009 02:40:09 AM 1020 Views
Don't you know it! - 06/12/2009 03:28:16 PM 936 Views
You talk the talk, that's for sure. - 07/12/2009 08:14:41 PM 1075 Views
Hate to break it to you... - 07/12/2009 09:54:24 PM 1127 Views
I thought you were gonna tell me... - 08/12/2009 03:07:54 PM 1192 Views
Metaphor versus literalism - 04/12/2009 05:42:03 PM 1093 Views
aha. but. - 07/12/2009 03:56:48 PM 1229 Views
Quoting Nietzsche is really hitting below the belt. - 07/12/2009 09:12:34 PM 1167 Views
It is good I was only paraphrasing, then - 08/12/2009 10:44:14 AM 1062 Views

Reply to Message