Active Users:1160 Time:22/11/2024 01:50:19 PM
IDK, I gave up on Hobb when it became apparent the dragons and elderlings were the new focus Cannoli Send a noteboard - 05/07/2016 12:06:28 PM

View original post
I know, I know, it's not her latest series. I'm new to Robin. Please bear in mind that I haven't read past City of Dragons yet, so anything that happens after that, is a spoiler for me - sorry! Also, I will mention things from previous book so, anyway...


In Fool's Fate, Fitz tunnels through ice to Icefyre, where he finds someone has driven a wedge between his scales and had unsuccessfuly tried to hammer a spike through his skin to his heart. Ok, maybe Icefyre is good and frozen solid - but he sure thaws out pretty fast if that is the case!

I didn't recall them making much progress. What I got was that they had not made much of a dent at all, that Icefyre was so big that the best efforts were ineffectual. His head would not fit through a door, after all.
So I wonder, why did the new dragons suffer so much from parasite on th way up the river? Perhaps they were weak and hungry. But then, how was someone able to stab Tintaglia through these supposedly strong scales? Even if it is a ery weak spot by her wing, why can she then not heal it at least to the point where it is not infected?
I hadn't read that last bit, but it makes sense that a limb joint would have less protection than directly over the vitals. At the least, the scales near the joints would need to move and be more flexible. As for the new dragons, that was what I got, also that they might be retarded or crippled or something. I didn't read past Fool's Fate, but what I recall of the commentary on the dragons' situation was that they were born or hatched in a weaker state than normal, and less able to fend for themselves. That was the significance of Icefyre, that the pre-existing larvae were not going to suffice to bring back the species, and that Tintaglia needed a mate to breed proper and healthy dragons.

I got into Hobb for the Assassin trilogy, and wasn't thrilled by the places the story went in the next trilogy. I didn't know the Liveship trilogy was connected until references in Tawny Man made it obvious there was something else going on there, so I went back and read it, but I didn't like the setting or new story stuff, and there weren't any characters I particularly cared for. Even Amber, even knowing her true identity, since the Fool was never an element of the Farseer books in which I had much interest, either as a character or plot device.

I don't like how the term "Mary Sue" is overused, not to mention misused, but the Fool and the dragon aspects seem to be one of those authorial favorites, in which the writer is far more fascinated than this particular reader.

Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Well, I'm reading Robin Hobb's Rain Wild Chronicles, and I don't understand these dragons. - 04/07/2016 07:59:35 PM 935 Views
IDK, I gave up on Hobb when it became apparent the dragons and elderlings were the new focus - 05/07/2016 12:06:28 PM 996 Views
I happened to read the Liveship trilogy first - 06/07/2016 10:16:12 AM 756 Views
I read both sets but far enough a part I didn't notice the connection - 25/08/2016 01:17:02 PM 682 Views
I'm a fan of Hobb but I haven't read these yet. - 12/08/2016 02:41:20 PM 683 Views

Reply to Message