The Scramble for Africa touches upon another point that I think people like Hochschild are loth to admit. Colonialism in Africa was, aside from South Africa, where the mines led to fabulous wealth, and Congo, where Leopold’s brutal monopolistic pseudo-slave state was able to maintain an unheard-of profit margin on rubber during the rubber boom, a huge economic loss for the colonial powers. Colonial agents died in their thousands of tropical fevers, malaria and other diseases that Europeans were unused to. At a certain point, the Great Powers were fighting over places just to extend their territory as an end in itself, with no thought as to the utility of the lands they were claiming.
I knew about this part from things I gleaned from other works discussing economic issues in general, but the few attempts I've made at poking into African history of any relevance to the rest of the world (that is to say, colonial) have been unable to find anything that really addresses this point, being either committed to the referenced ideological narrative, or engrossed in the atrocities or the acquisition of "assets" by the Powers. In other words, too big or too narrow a perspective, and in each case, a rather Euro-centric one. A comprehensive & objective history that you portray this book as, sounds like what I'm looking for.
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*