Active Users:407 Time:22/12/2024 11:48:00 PM
Perhaps, but I think "rating-based" reviews distort views to fit into a template Larry Send a noteboard - 22/11/2013 08:47:18 AM

View original post
View original postMight be because I detest rating systems and those seem to be the most visible aspect of the site

True, they're rather primitive as evaluation goes - and since one has complete freedom in how to use the rating system, they are less than helpful in telling you how people feel about a book, anyway. A friend of mine recently gave Oliver Twist a one-star review, so I enquired, and in the end we were in agreement on essentially everything about the book - except I gave it four stars and she gave it one (admittedly, she's Jewish and Fagin did play a role, but even so).

The averages of ratings for books also tend to mystify me, as I've been unable to see any kind of pattern in why some books score higher than others - the ones with high scores are certainly not always the ones you would expect, thinking about what a large group of readers' opinions would likely average out to.

Still, ignoring the ratings, the site is useful in a few regards - a convenient way of maintaing a list of books to read and finding other books that might be of interest, and showing you what your friends are reading so you can pick up the same book or start a conversation on a book you've both read. But the discussion system isn't exactly great for longer discussions involving multiple people, I've no idea how people manage to find their way in the hundreds-of-pages threads that do somehow crop up in the book clubs (when you try to quote an earlier post, it automatically cuts off after a really very short character limit, so you end up quoting manually anyhow).


And so you save me the trouble of listing some of the other concerns that I'd have with it in that last paragraph I maintain my reading lists in a series of notebooks that go back to 2006 (lost the summer lists from the 1990s that I used to keep, alas) and the act of writing down the titles adds something to the experience that I don't think typing it does (although I reproduce my reading logs in monthly posts on the OF Blog). It's a bit more personal that way and no algorithms or social media plug-ins can replicate that for me.

Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
To whom do you turn when you want to learn more about new books? - 10/11/2013 06:17:07 AM 1332 Views
This is the only place. - 10/11/2013 04:26:22 PM 1053 Views
Maybe, but I'm a bit skeptical - 11/11/2013 12:14:36 AM 983 Views
If you want to attract NEW readers, the site needs to be reworked from scratch - 13/11/2013 01:06:41 PM 944 Views
Preaching to the choir here - 14/11/2013 07:55:56 AM 1060 Views
Re: If you want to attract NEW readers, the site needs to be reworked from scratch - 21/11/2013 09:24:22 PM 989 Views
That might be swimming upstream against a strong current - 22/11/2013 08:41:15 AM 958 Views
Quite - 22/11/2013 03:34:50 PM 846 Views
io9 - 10/11/2013 07:32:41 PM 1263 Views
Locus Online also has good lists of upcoming/new SF/F releases - 11/11/2013 12:16:18 AM 961 Views
The Economist, NYT, and WSJ - 11/11/2013 01:05:36 PM 956 Views
Very true - 14/11/2013 07:57:14 AM 975 Views
I'm skeptical of the Economist. - 16/11/2013 05:02:47 PM 918 Views
Which books were those? - 19/11/2013 03:19:59 PM 930 Views
There were at least four or five bad reviews. - 30/11/2013 05:41:45 PM 959 Views
I remember reading that book. I don't recall being impressed by it. *NM* - 05/12/2013 03:37:59 PM 514 Views
I've essentially stopped reading - 11/11/2013 12:36:51 AM 1092 Views
I don't think very highly of the discussions on r/fantasy - 11/11/2013 08:25:54 AM 1119 Views
I've never even been to r/fantasy - 11/11/2013 08:31:11 AM 951 Views
I'd say this place is still the most influential for me. - 11/11/2013 10:29:19 AM 941 Views
For some odd reason, I distrust Goodreads - 14/11/2013 07:58:29 AM 1053 Views
"Distrust"? Interesting word choice. - 14/11/2013 09:32:35 PM 1049 Views
Perhaps, but I think "rating-based" reviews distort views to fit into a template - 22/11/2013 08:47:18 AM 837 Views
Call me old fashioned... - 11/11/2013 02:47:37 PM 903 Views
Old fashioned! - 14/11/2013 07:59:43 AM 927 Views
I second that suggestion. - 14/11/2013 09:35:51 PM 856 Views
Re: I second that suggestion. - 16/11/2013 02:10:10 AM 767 Views
Here mostly, Goodreads, io9 - 11/11/2013 09:40:41 PM 1011 Views
Interesting - 14/11/2013 08:01:05 AM 900 Views
Typically new is "New to me" - 14/11/2013 08:36:09 AM 1148 Views
Ah, I understand a bit more now. Thanks. - 22/11/2013 08:50:26 AM 887 Views
Here mostly too. And bookshops over here. - 12/11/2013 06:54:05 PM 898 Views
I have list of things to read longer than I have time to read - 13/11/2013 05:39:59 PM 874 Views
So true - 14/11/2013 08:03:16 AM 899 Views
here, mostly, but i also have less time to read (sort of) and a lot to read... - 19/11/2013 03:49:15 PM 828 Views
Quick, cozy comfort zone reads, more or less? - 22/11/2013 08:52:37 AM 758 Views
It depends on what is happening at the time - 30/11/2013 12:15:55 AM 722 Views
I don't really care to learn about new books. - 21/11/2013 08:58:44 PM 886 Views
I'm all BELE - 29/11/2013 07:12:03 PM 839 Views
Book recommendations can come from the oddest places... - 07/12/2013 04:36:26 AM 854 Views

Reply to Message