Active Users:667 Time:23/12/2024 01:26:43 AM
If you want to attract NEW readers, the site needs to be reworked from scratch Werthead Send a noteboard - 13/11/2013 01:06:41 PM

RAFO was created as a Wotmania nostalgia exercise, which is fine for the purposes of ensuring continuity from the old Wotmania board. However, newcomers (and some old hands) will be put off by the website looking like it's still in 1998.

So that discussion goes to the heart of what RAFO is for and what it will be in the future. If it's to be more of a literary review site (and 'Read and Find Out' is a fine title even separated from its WoT origins), it needs some serious and heavy work. If it's to remain a WoTmania fansite, it can stay as it is and probably die of obscurity in a few years time.

Harsh, possibly, but I think also accurate seeing what's happened to many other sites.

Reply to message
To whom do you turn when you want to learn more about new books? - 10/11/2013 06:17:07 AM 1333 Views
This is the only place. - 10/11/2013 04:26:22 PM 1055 Views
Maybe, but I'm a bit skeptical - 11/11/2013 12:14:36 AM 984 Views
If you want to attract NEW readers, the site needs to be reworked from scratch - 13/11/2013 01:06:41 PM 946 Views
Preaching to the choir here - 14/11/2013 07:55:56 AM 1062 Views
Re: If you want to attract NEW readers, the site needs to be reworked from scratch - 21/11/2013 09:24:22 PM 991 Views
That might be swimming upstream against a strong current - 22/11/2013 08:41:15 AM 960 Views
Quite - 22/11/2013 03:34:50 PM 848 Views
io9 - 10/11/2013 07:32:41 PM 1264 Views
Locus Online also has good lists of upcoming/new SF/F releases - 11/11/2013 12:16:18 AM 961 Views
The Economist, NYT, and WSJ - 11/11/2013 01:05:36 PM 958 Views
Very true - 14/11/2013 07:57:14 AM 977 Views
I'm skeptical of the Economist. - 16/11/2013 05:02:47 PM 920 Views
Which books were those? - 19/11/2013 03:19:59 PM 930 Views
There were at least four or five bad reviews. - 30/11/2013 05:41:45 PM 960 Views
I remember reading that book. I don't recall being impressed by it. *NM* - 05/12/2013 03:37:59 PM 514 Views
I've essentially stopped reading - 11/11/2013 12:36:51 AM 1093 Views
I don't think very highly of the discussions on r/fantasy - 11/11/2013 08:25:54 AM 1119 Views
I've never even been to r/fantasy - 11/11/2013 08:31:11 AM 953 Views
I'd say this place is still the most influential for me. - 11/11/2013 10:29:19 AM 942 Views
For some odd reason, I distrust Goodreads - 14/11/2013 07:58:29 AM 1054 Views
"Distrust"? Interesting word choice. - 14/11/2013 09:32:35 PM 1051 Views
Call me old fashioned... - 11/11/2013 02:47:37 PM 904 Views
Old fashioned! - 14/11/2013 07:59:43 AM 929 Views
I second that suggestion. - 14/11/2013 09:35:51 PM 858 Views
Re: I second that suggestion. - 16/11/2013 02:10:10 AM 768 Views
Here mostly, Goodreads, io9 - 11/11/2013 09:40:41 PM 1011 Views
Interesting - 14/11/2013 08:01:05 AM 902 Views
Typically new is "New to me" - 14/11/2013 08:36:09 AM 1148 Views
Ah, I understand a bit more now. Thanks. - 22/11/2013 08:50:26 AM 887 Views
Here mostly too. And bookshops over here. - 12/11/2013 06:54:05 PM 900 Views
I have list of things to read longer than I have time to read - 13/11/2013 05:39:59 PM 875 Views
So true - 14/11/2013 08:03:16 AM 901 Views
here, mostly, but i also have less time to read (sort of) and a lot to read... - 19/11/2013 03:49:15 PM 829 Views
Quick, cozy comfort zone reads, more or less? - 22/11/2013 08:52:37 AM 759 Views
It depends on what is happening at the time - 30/11/2013 12:15:55 AM 724 Views
I don't really care to learn about new books. - 21/11/2013 08:58:44 PM 888 Views
I'm all BELE - 29/11/2013 07:12:03 PM 841 Views
Book recommendations can come from the oddest places... - 07/12/2013 04:36:26 AM 856 Views

Reply to Message