Strong suits of the books, in my opinion, include first and foremost Erikson's habit (although it can admittedly be maddening as well) of intentionally giving the reader only part of the picture at any given point, so that you always have to figure some things out for yourself, and when reading later books constantly come across things that make you reevaluate events in earlier books.
Other than that, he's terrific at writing "epic" scenes and characters, with tons of great battle scenes, duels, heroic stands and whatnot - in fact, he's made it an actual rule of the universe his books are set in, that there are periodic "convergences" of powerful characters, armies and (demi-)gods converging in one place and having a big showdown, which is always at the end of each novel. Some of his characters are really good, although there's such insane amounts of characters that inevitably some of them start to blend together, and there are (too) many who fail to find an individual voice. And thematically, he has many interesting scenes and thoughts about things like the rise and fall of civilizations (his universe's backstory goes back a million or so years, so there's room for rather a lot of fallen civilizations), the horrors of war, the comradeship between fellow soldiers (there seem to be some influences of American military journals of WW2, or at least that's what it feels like to me), and so on.
In what I and many others feel is the best book of the series, Memories of Ice (the third one), to take just one example, there's an amazing balance between intimate character moments, epic battles, surprise plot twists and thematic strength. I personally felt that balance was lacking too often in the later books, but even the weaker Malazan novels are still better than most fantasy books.
As for a satisfying conclusion, it's basically what one might expect based on what I wrote in the first paragraph: the conclusion of the main series is certainly suitably epic, and it makes you reevaluate most everything that came before. It doesn't tie off remotely every plot line, though, since both Erikson and his co-creator of the universe Ian Cameron Esslemont are writing other books/series set in the universe. Erikson's own new series is a prequel, but Esslemont's books that are out so far fill certain gaps in the main series and continue some plot lines where they were left off.
Other than that, he's terrific at writing "epic" scenes and characters, with tons of great battle scenes, duels, heroic stands and whatnot - in fact, he's made it an actual rule of the universe his books are set in, that there are periodic "convergences" of powerful characters, armies and (demi-)gods converging in one place and having a big showdown, which is always at the end of each novel. Some of his characters are really good, although there's such insane amounts of characters that inevitably some of them start to blend together, and there are (too) many who fail to find an individual voice. And thematically, he has many interesting scenes and thoughts about things like the rise and fall of civilizations (his universe's backstory goes back a million or so years, so there's room for rather a lot of fallen civilizations), the horrors of war, the comradeship between fellow soldiers (there seem to be some influences of American military journals of WW2, or at least that's what it feels like to me), and so on.
In what I and many others feel is the best book of the series, Memories of Ice (the third one), to take just one example, there's an amazing balance between intimate character moments, epic battles, surprise plot twists and thematic strength. I personally felt that balance was lacking too often in the later books, but even the weaker Malazan novels are still better than most fantasy books.
As for a satisfying conclusion, it's basically what one might expect based on what I wrote in the first paragraph: the conclusion of the main series is certainly suitably epic, and it makes you reevaluate most everything that came before. It doesn't tie off remotely every plot line, though, since both Erikson and his co-creator of the universe Ian Cameron Esslemont are writing other books/series set in the universe. Erikson's own new series is a prequel, but Esslemont's books that are out so far fill certain gaps in the main series and continue some plot lines where they were left off.
Are the Malazan books any good?
25/12/2012 05:05:46 AM
- 1319 Views
They're among the best fantasy series out there, yes.
25/12/2012 07:02:39 PM
- 906 Views
What makes it so good, your opinion? Also, does it have a satisfying conclusion? *NM*
26/12/2012 10:50:53 PM
- 353 Views
Good questions.
26/12/2012 11:30:14 PM
- 1094 Views
Great info, thanks! A few more questions.....
27/12/2012 12:30:39 AM
- 892 Views
I actually haven't read the last two books yet, but my answer has to be a no
27/12/2012 07:37:36 AM
- 826 Views
Thanks to everyone for their feedback. I'm thinking of starting Malazan after AMOL as well. *NM*
28/12/2012 03:39:34 PM
- 428 Views
I liked the first one; the second one, not so much. I haven't read beyond that.
28/12/2012 07:24:35 PM
- 947 Views
Yes. Yes, it does.
28/12/2012 10:41:17 PM
- 827 Views
I liked the first one... *Major Book 2 Spoilers*
28/12/2012 10:51:09 PM
- 887 Views
Felisin always kinda sucked, but the second point was one of the best parts!
29/12/2012 02:29:08 AM
- 844 Views
The complaints about Felisin have always had me shaking my head
29/12/2012 02:38:03 AM
- 882 Views
I think it's just indicative of general misogyny in the fantasy readerbase, myself. *spoilers*
30/12/2012 09:51:08 AM
- 890 Views
sausagefest of a post up in here
09/01/2013 04:43:38 PM
- 826 Views
Sadly, most posts here are that
09/01/2013 05:31:40 PM
- 948 Views
Not much mystery to that, is there?
09/01/2013 05:52:09 PM
- 873 Views
Nope, no mystery at all
09/01/2013 06:12:17 PM
- 882 Views
Of course, the genre as a whole has more male readers.
09/01/2013 06:32:34 PM
- 820 Views