I have noticed a tension between the character of Raistlin and the gameworld's absolutist approach toward Good/Neutral/Evil. His character is interesting at times; the writing just dampens it considerably for me. Much of that is likely due to the game origins getting in way of the trilogy's main plot/characterizations.
The game has a nine-part alignment spectrum ranging from 'Lawful Good' to 'Chaotic Evil' and stopping off at intervening points (consisting of Good/Neutral/Evil and Lawful/Neutral/Chaotic). The degree to which players follow this varies (some ignore it, some follow it and award harsh penalties for players who act 'against alignment'

Raistlin is more interesting in that the character pretty much ignores those rules. Some of the other more successful D&D tie-ins - such as Lynn Abbey's highly revisionist RISE AND FALL OF A DRAGON KING, which presents a not-entirely-condemning portrait of one of the DARK SUN world's biggest villains - are also ones which challenge some of those limitations.
One of Drizzt's problems is that Salvatore writes to his alignment (Chaotic Good) far too rigidly: "He doesn't follow laws but has his own code of honour and Always Does The Right Thing! Whilst being badass!"
Such rules are stupid when trying to develop dynamic characters, but then again, I've never played the game, so it may be different within that context.
Shakespeare this is not, even if I used the Shakespearean sonnet form

Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.

This may be one of the most dire reviews you shall ever read
09/09/2012 09:12:25 PM
- 2140 Views
A review of a D&D bestiary could be more dire.
09/09/2012 11:29:17 PM
- 1244 Views
Perhaps
09/09/2012 11:50:20 PM
- 1352 Views
They are popular as they are fun, easy reading books
10/09/2012 12:11:24 AM
- 1329 Views
"Popular", "Fun," and "Easy" doesn't have to be equated with poorly-written
10/09/2012 12:16:27 AM
- 1459 Views
Poorly written by what standard?
10/09/2012 12:29:17 AM
- 1411 Views
By the standards of what I enjoyed as a nine year-old?
10/09/2012 01:04:12 AM
- 1352 Views
So like I said, by the standards of Elitist Literary Snobs
11/09/2012 12:03:08 AM
- 1457 Views
Nice attempt at sophistry, but alas, it fails
11/09/2012 12:38:24 AM
- 1357 Views
Was that meant to make any sense?
11/09/2012 01:43:13 AM
- 1506 Views
Re: Was that meant to make any sense?
11/09/2012 01:54:23 AM
- 1351 Views
I'm with Wibble on this (big surprise)
12/09/2012 03:07:53 PM
- 1466 Views
Heh.
12/09/2012 03:43:52 PM
- 1497 Views
Pretty much so
12/09/2012 04:19:35 PM
- 1489 Views
When did you put up that header?
12/09/2012 04:35:20 PM
- 1374 Views
I didn't put it up
12/09/2012 04:51:32 PM
- 1280 Views
I shall tread lightly so.
12/09/2012 06:15:51 PM
- 1407 Views
12/09/2012 07:25:29 PM
- 1263 Views

Re: Pretty much so
12/09/2012 08:50:57 PM
- 1394 Views
You apparently do not read my blog/reviews much
12/09/2012 09:07:18 PM
- 1414 Views
Actually, I read them almost never
13/09/2012 03:07:48 PM
- 1452 Views
I think my IQ dropped a little bit when I parsed what you said
13/09/2012 04:16:21 PM
- 1409 Views
Yep, your usual rebuttal... *NM*
17/09/2012 02:14:56 PM
- 683 Views
No, not really
17/09/2012 06:25:15 PM
- 1221 Views
Yes, Yes, wrap yourself in arrogance and declare yourself correct until your opposite gets bored...
17/09/2012 11:12:17 PM
- 1535 Views
Don't try to argue with them. They've made their judgments. They are better than you.
10/09/2012 09:36:17 PM
- 1367 Views
Defensive much?
*NM*
10/09/2012 10:31:17 PM
- 740 Views

Perhaps. It's annoying, because I tend to agree with you guys - you and Tom and Stephen.
11/09/2012 02:32:28 AM
- 1364 Views
The odd thing that there wasn't any belittling on my part -see other response. *NM*
11/09/2012 03:17:36 AM
- 687 Views
For the record, I wasn't trying to be condescending in my response.
11/09/2012 05:52:29 PM
- 1373 Views
He never said you couldn't enjoy it.
10/09/2012 11:10:11 PM
- 1479 Views
He also went on to compare liking the books to having the standards of a nine-year-old.
11/09/2012 02:34:18 AM
- 1349 Views
You didn't read what I said very well then
11/09/2012 03:16:21 AM
- 1345 Views
You're right. In the context of this thread, I'm basically acting like a raving lunatic.
11/09/2012 02:48:19 PM
- 1378 Views
It's not like any of us have ever been innocent 100% of the time
11/09/2012 03:49:22 PM
- 1308 Views

I believe that they were not meant for adults.
10/09/2012 12:30:05 AM
- 1361 Views
Very few of my friends were reading the books; some played the game, though
10/09/2012 01:06:07 AM
- 1334 Views
Basically, both get dubious kudos for trying something new by the dire standards of the day.
10/09/2012 11:38:22 PM
- 1380 Views
Interesting point
11/09/2012 12:41:01 AM
- 1345 Views
Are you aware of the game's alignment rules? Some of the novels struggle with this.
12/09/2012 10:58:37 PM
- 1356 Views
Not aware of it at all until now
12/09/2012 11:18:57 PM
- 1346 Views
How is that possible?
12/09/2012 11:28:33 PM
- 1304 Views
My dad was (and is) influenced by Evangelicals
13/09/2012 12:17:36 AM
- 1250 Views
Wait, so you didn't read the Chronicles first?
13/09/2012 02:12:13 PM
- 1250 Views
No
13/09/2012 02:18:03 PM
- 1325 Views
Chronicles is considerably weaker
13/09/2012 11:14:38 PM
- 1353 Views
Needless to say, once I finish reading the Icewind Dale trilogy, I'm done with D&D
14/09/2012 12:38:47 AM
- 1458 Views

These threads are so much better than the rape threads! *NM*
12/09/2012 04:03:01 AM
- 765 Views
You're just waiting to see if I'll use hexameter in the next one
*NM*
12/09/2012 04:32:31 AM
- 609 Views

And having now finished Dragonlance: Legends, its very own sonnet
13/09/2012 12:31:51 PM
- 1338 Views

At least you didn't read the Baldur's Gate novelizations
14/09/2012 04:29:17 AM
- 1272 Views
Sssssh!
14/09/2012 05:10:19 AM
- 1338 Views
Baldurs Gate wooooo!
14/09/2012 04:13:34 PM
- 1393 Views
Eh, Star Wars Expanded Universe I could see reading. Some of them are supposed to be good
17/09/2012 04:37:05 PM
- 1700 Views
Is the review dire because of the subject or the sonnet form?
14/09/2012 04:24:37 PM
- 1309 Views
Both
14/09/2012 04:36:59 PM
- 1285 Views

it would be unusual for someone to just randomly pick books like that up
14/09/2012 05:05:37 PM
- 1545 Views
Interesting scenario
14/09/2012 10:16:11 PM
- 1308 Views