Hm, yes, I can see that... that she doesn't really dare to tackle controversies too much.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 28/08/2012 11:03:11 PM
And have got her book on the Bible to read.
While I thought the book on Muhammad was very readable, it seemed very sympathetic to me rather than being critical.
And in that case I suppose you might as well go back to basics and take an openly Islamic biography of Muhammad, like some modern edition of Ibn Ishaq - but that's for a Muhammad biography. Her comparative religions may suffer of the same shying away from controversies issue, but there at least you get more information.
The thing is, basically, that her books are very much about reconciling the three religions and helping their believers to get along.
I suppose this is sort of a survey. Or not. Whatever: world religions
28/08/2012 03:39:17 PM
- 1056 Views
It's hard to suggest something when you can't elucidate a goal
28/08/2012 08:51:22 PM
- 837 Views
I know. I'm sorry.
28/08/2012 09:49:33 PM
- 728 Views
The best one I have is The Religious Experience of Mankind by Ninian Smart.
29/08/2012 02:09:14 AM
- 784 Views
Also, you might want to try typing in "Oxford World Religion" at amazon.com
28/08/2012 08:54:52 PM
- 758 Views
Haven't really read much about religion... interesting question.
28/08/2012 10:13:08 PM
- 796 Views
I've read her book on Muhammad
28/08/2012 10:38:31 PM
- 852 Views
Hm, yes, I can see that... that she doesn't really dare to tackle controversies too much.
28/08/2012 11:03:11 PM
- 755 Views
With respect to Islam, I prefer the Ibn Warraq edited ones.
29/08/2012 02:13:25 AM
- 797 Views
I think the main effect is it means they can't be read alone to get a balanced picture
29/08/2012 05:19:55 PM
- 778 Views
I think for what you're looking for, Wikipedia and related online resources is all you need. *NM*
01/09/2012 02:19:14 PM
- 366 Views