Active Users:588 Time:17/04/2025 05:47:38 PM
Dude, it's because your post sucked. Dan Send a noteboard - 02/06/2012 12:43:03 PM
And I agree the book sucked, by the way, I could go on and on about how horrible it was in the same manner as you, and happily. I've done it before. And, people tend to be very glad to discuss Erikson on the board. But the thing is, your post was really fucking stupid. The book did suck, but you focused on one superficial and incorrrect problem with it that is easily explained away rather than addressing the book as a whole, and you did it with spelling errors and all caps. What do you expect? You came of as an idiot. I doubt you are, but just the same.

For the record, Krul being female is explained by the fact that Krul as a deity transcends gender and took on a female aspect. It was a bit unprecedented, if I recall the series correctly, but it's not terribly bizarre given Erikson's fecund cosmology, it suggests an additional level of depth to his universe. Esslemont is not illiterate, or a moron, and he helped build that world, with those gods, and those rules along with Erikson, in equal part. He did not make a mistake. You did reading it. The book sucks, though, true.


I know it wasn't the most eloquent of posts but at least someone could agree or disagree. This board used to actually care about such things.

Jeez. I might as well retire from this place. Should I even bother writing a review or will its ligaments and superficial tissues simply be picked apart by uncaring vultures of conformity and apathy while its meat and bones goes undevoured by you carrion of complacency?!?

*sigh*

btw, the rest of the book sucked too.
Reply to message
Why Esselmont is an illiterate, lazy, MORON. - 31/05/2012 02:24:16 AM 1857 Views
I could point out the irony here. - 31/05/2012 03:37:24 AM 999 Views
Rants do that to me. Sorry. *NM* - 31/05/2012 01:59:04 PM 332 Views
Re: I could point out the irony here. - 31/05/2012 02:10:08 PM 788 Views
I did write that at like half three in the morning. - 31/05/2012 04:24:29 PM 762 Views
My bad. - 31/05/2012 06:08:19 PM 727 Views
Ahh. I hadn't paid attention to the timestamp of your post. *NM* - 01/06/2012 01:55:40 PM 346 Views
No worries. *NM* - 01/06/2012 02:05:50 PM 332 Views
Only in Amercia does Esslemont get misspelled here *NM* - 01/06/2012 11:42:29 AM 670 Views
ROTLFMOA! *NM* - 01/06/2012 01:58:41 PM 362 Views
Re: Only in Amercia does Esslemont get misspelled here <--- that's ungrammatical!! - 01/06/2012 04:37:56 PM 1218 Views
- 01/06/2012 05:08:06 PM 1003 Views
well, in that case your answer for how could be "because of tn native speakers of engish" perhaps... - 06/06/2012 03:38:03 AM 859 Views
Pfft! - 07/06/2012 06:59:35 AM 656 Views
Re: Pfft! - 08/06/2012 08:06:14 PM 963 Views
Deitic anaphora? Jw. *NM* - 02/06/2012 02:58:26 AM 451 Views
Oh, damn you all. - 02/06/2012 04:13:40 AM 768 Views
Dude, it's because your post sucked. - 02/06/2012 12:43:03 PM 1060 Views
duly noted. - 02/06/2012 01:28:00 PM 886 Views
Pfft! - 02/06/2012 05:00:30 PM 964 Views
I look forward to hearing about them. - 03/06/2012 11:16:51 PM 730 Views

Reply to Message