I even usually like the movie adaptations of them, and I can't explain why. I hate the Brontes - that is to chick lit what chick lit is to literature generally - but Jane Austen is wonderful.
I'm indifferent re: the Bronte sisters. I've read several Austens though, and liked them all. I definitely think that even though they're dealing with chick-lit topics, the sauciness makes up for the sappy crap.
Just read Pride and Prejudice again.
25/04/2012 04:21:27 PM
- 1471 Views
honestly...I liked it better with zombies.
25/04/2012 05:15:12 PM
- 1120 Views
Never read that.
25/04/2012 10:14:51 PM
- 1116 Views
it has a lot of the charm of the original, and then the additional charm of zombies
25/04/2012 11:36:55 PM
- 1229 Views
I don't know what it is about that book, but yes, I do love it.
25/04/2012 06:56:28 PM
- 1167 Views
I love Thomas Hardy.
25/04/2012 08:33:41 PM
- 1089 Views
Hm. I never could. Which book particularly?
25/04/2012 10:09:16 PM
- 1192 Views
Jude the Obscure.
26/04/2012 03:10:25 AM
- 1240 Views
Mary's still presented as better than Lydia and their mother. Kind of.
26/04/2012 08:40:40 PM
- 1139 Views
Re: Mary's still presented as better than Lydia and their mother. Kind of.
26/04/2012 09:40:14 PM
- 1373 Views
See, I keep thinking Jane Austen books are "chick lit" but I like them anyway.
26/04/2012 02:43:07 AM
- 1101 Views
Oh, come on. Jane Eyre is a great book.
26/04/2012 08:42:17 PM
- 1126 Views
Hated Wuthering Heights. (but not as much as I hate Rochester of course)
26/04/2012 09:31:13 PM
- 1144 Views
I don't think the first adaptation is cheating
26/04/2012 10:04:14 PM
- 1013 Views
I admit she's too good for him - but isn't that part of the point?
26/04/2012 10:08:13 PM
- 1111 Views
I do too.
27/04/2012 10:44:13 PM
- 1031 Views
Could someone explain to me why Jane Austen's prose is considered good?
27/04/2012 12:24:00 AM
- 1307 Views
Dialogue, wit, characters. The plot and descriptive prose are merely functional, true.
27/04/2012 11:26:27 PM
- 1037 Views