I don't think it's these guys' contention that Dante was particularly Islamophobic, anti-Semitic, homophobic or offensive by the standards of his time (indeed, that would have been a rather difficult thesis to defend even if he'd been still worse than he is). Their point is that those passages are all those things by modern standards, and that Italian education rather fails at putting them in their proper historical perspective. Which, as I noted elsewhere, is of course not a statement that we can easily verify.
(...)
There is certainly something gratuitous about this thing in the way they thrive off the publicity created by the suggestion of removing Dante from the compulsory curriculum. An intentional provocation to guarantee them media attention for their rather less revolutionary goals.
(...)
There is certainly something gratuitous about this thing in the way they thrive off the publicity created by the suggestion of removing Dante from the compulsory curriculum. An intentional provocation to guarantee them media attention for their rather less revolutionary goals.
We can't go verify anything (at least until/unless a credible source comes to the defense of the book on the curriculum - it's the sort of controversy, if it doesn't die fast, that might well attract the attention of Eco), but it's also well known Italy have had and is still having social problems related to xenophobia and racism (and there's many Italians who ressent a lot the influence the CC still has on public life)
Dante's book is a medieval classic and one of the monuments of Italian culture. However, it's far from the only one the education system can choose to focus on, and it's a perfectly legitimate opinion to question the wisdom of leaving a book like this on the curriculum in the current socio-political climate, and considering modern values.
It's also a perfectly valid opinion that the book ought to stay on the curriculum, but the way it's presented changes to take into account the modern values and the fact far from all students nowadays are catholics - that the aspects of the book that can be construed as dubious or risqué within an education system that aim to promote anti-racism or religious prejudices. That book was always meant to be provocative and offensive and it has salvoes for everyone, really. Many would argue that placing works like the Divine Comedy that could be construed as racist/xenophobic in the closet is hardly the right way to teach the right values to today's students (Eco notably would likely be of that opinion). Ironically, the way this groups attacks Dante is rather similar to the way some Italian Rabbi and a Catholic theologian writing for the OR attacked Eco's latest novel.
If in the education system the DC is taught merely for its artistic/literay value and no effort at all are made to address some of the values it carries and why and how they differ from modern ones, I can understand why its presence on the curriculum could irritate a lot some progressists.
As for their ridiculous mediatic controversy and virulent (and in many places misguided or vicious) attacks at the catholic culture/values in there... well, that's Italy for you. This sounds very much not like a rationally presented, temperate attempt to have the book removed from the curriculum so much as a call to arms to all those in favour of laicity in Italian civil life and to shake their complacency by appealing to emotions and outrage. Very populist...
Every time a controversy like this arises in Italy it always seems to turn into this sort of mud fight, especially when it concerns religious issues or the CC. Militant atheists or promoters of laicity there seem compelled to turn into rabid dogs, and the Catholic defenders are hardly more temperate in their opinions. There's a serious lack of moderation and rationality from both sides. It's always weird/funny to watching this from outside the Italian society.
This message last edited by DomA on 21/03/2012 at 10:10:12 PM
Divine Comedy is "offensive and discriminatory", says Italian NGO
20/03/2012 07:25:08 PM
- 1326 Views
Duh?
20/03/2012 07:38:41 PM
- 782 Views
It does kind of feel like we should know more about how it's taught in Italian schools.
20/03/2012 07:50:36 PM
- 711 Views
Isn't the fundamental basis of Christanity mutually exclusive to Judaism and Islam?
20/03/2012 08:33:51 PM
- 697 Views
That's a really good point that I hadn't considered. I agree. *NM*
22/03/2012 09:05:00 AM
- 316 Views
Just because someone is in Hell doesn't mean you should discriminate against them
20/03/2012 08:23:22 PM
- 835 Views
Not having read any Dante is kind of hurting my ability to reply to that.
20/03/2012 10:08:52 PM
- 1074 Views
Odd, considering you linked the "offending passages"
20/03/2012 11:54:34 PM
- 748 Views
Yes, well, I was semi-serious with the "pretending to understand Italian".
21/03/2012 07:58:35 PM
- 732 Views
I rather agree with you
21/03/2012 10:09:01 PM
- 897 Views
Taking the Divine Comedy off the curriculum would be like taking Shakespeare out in the UK.
21/03/2012 10:48:15 PM
- 693 Views
But some works of Flaubert aren't considered OK for compulsory reads...
22/03/2012 05:27:04 AM
- 699 Views
The last part of Hell is Giudecca because of Judas.
21/03/2012 10:30:36 PM
- 816 Views
And you don't see what's offensive about that?
21/03/2012 11:11:16 PM
- 700 Views
You are making an assumption that Dante named it after Jewish quarters.
21/03/2012 11:24:47 PM
- 1136 Views
Wait, let's be clear just how bat-shit Rick Santorum crazy these assholes are.
21/03/2012 01:06:49 AM
- 780 Views
They also dont seem to realize just how many Muslim nations are calling for the eradication of Israe *NM*
21/03/2012 04:33:53 PM
- 424 Views
There's some things in that paragraph one can roll one's eyes at, aye - but that's as far as it goes
21/03/2012 08:06:32 PM
- 673 Views
Are you serious?! Did you read the whole paragraph?
21/03/2012 10:24:56 PM
- 700 Views
I certainly did. Though as it turns out I had not read their other articles...
21/03/2012 10:59:51 PM
- 744 Views
I saw that. Seems a little misguided
21/03/2012 07:04:06 AM
- 718 Views
That's what they're advocating. And I wouldn't know - they seem to think it is. *NM*
21/03/2012 08:08:53 PM
- 303 Views
I think that sometimes people take "politicly correct" tooooo far... *NM*
21/03/2012 08:20:31 AM
- 409 Views
Let me sum up my opinion on this as succinctly and clearly as I can:
21/03/2012 11:50:37 PM
- 691 Views