Active Users:491 Time:05/04/2025 05:21:32 PM
Neither. Werthead Send a noteboard - 26/09/2009 06:07:59 PM
THE BELGARIAD is a decent YA fantasy series but it's also very childish. I read it when I was 12 or so and enjoyed it as the first epic fantasy I'd ever read. However, if you're much older than that and especially if you've read other, more advanced fantasies such as WHEEL OF TIME or LORD OF THE RINGS, then reading Eddings is seriously dropping down several levels. Some YA fantasy authors such as Rowling and Pullman remain interesting to read as adults, but Eddings does not fit into that bracket.

The first book of RUNELORDS is okay, not brilliant, but not too bad. It has a strong central concept (although it's one partially 'borrowed' from Guy Gavriel Kay's much stronger FIONAVAR TAPESTRY trilogy) and some good moments. Book 2 is absolutely awful, and the later books have been spun out into some horrible and joyless money-making franchise.

So I'd suggest going after something much more interesting to read. There's literally dozens of authors in the fantasy genre who are much better than these two.
Reply to message
/Discussion: David Farland "The RuneLords" or David Edding "The Belgariad" - 26/09/2009 03:19:44 AM 902 Views
I enjoyed the first three Runelords books. - 26/09/2009 03:24:30 AM 829 Views
As an Eddings fan from my childhood... - 26/09/2009 06:50:03 AM 771 Views
I'm quite willing to forgive Eddings for that. - 26/09/2009 03:23:16 PM 680 Views
Runelords - 26/09/2009 08:49:32 AM 737 Views
Eddings. - 26/09/2009 03:26:38 PM 808 Views
Neither. - 26/09/2009 06:07:59 PM 1454 Views
Book 2 was not very good, I agree. *NM* - 26/09/2009 07:41:58 PM 273 Views
I've read the Runelords - 26/09/2009 07:40:05 PM 715 Views
I think... - 27/09/2009 03:19:59 AM 657 Views
Well I think... - 27/09/2009 03:58:14 AM 658 Views
I've read both - 27/09/2009 07:45:14 AM 734 Views
Runelords - 27/09/2009 03:30:28 PM 704 Views

Reply to Message