For the record, I was Catholic for the first 19 years of my life.
Tom Send a noteboard - 12/02/2012 11:35:16 PM
On your first point, among the prophets only Elijah was physically taken into heaven without dying (the only other example in the entire Old Testament that comes to mind is Enoch), and so saying that someone is Jeremiah returned doesn't fit as easily into the idea of sent back from a paradise. In addition, there was a current in Judaism at that time that spoke of reincarnation. I'm not expecting Ratzinger to come out in favor of reincarnation, but I did expect him to perhaps mention it in passing.
The Pauline statement refuting it is at Hebrews 9:27 - "Just as it is appointed that human beings die once, and after this the judgment, so also Christ, offered once to take away the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to take away sin but to bring salvation to those who eagerly await him."
My point about the parable of the rich man and Lazarus is that Ratzinger completely ignored an opportunity to make statements about the Church's social doctrine. It would be like mentioning the "Render unto Caesar" phrase and saying nothing about the implied recognition that temporal and spiritual power derive from different sources.
The Pauline statement refuting it is at Hebrews 9:27 - "Just as it is appointed that human beings die once, and after this the judgment, so also Christ, offered once to take away the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to take away sin but to bring salvation to those who eagerly await him."
My point about the parable of the rich man and Lazarus is that Ratzinger completely ignored an opportunity to make statements about the Church's social doctrine. It would be like mentioning the "Render unto Caesar" phrase and saying nothing about the implied recognition that temporal and spiritual power derive from different sources.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
Jesus von Nazareth (Book I), by Joseph Ratzinger
12/02/2012 12:52:30 AM
- 8001 Views
Do you know of any works by Ratzinger that directly address Ontological and Cosmological issues? *NM*
12/02/2012 01:54:08 PM
- 813 Views
Re: Jesus von Nazareth (Book I), by Joseph Ratzinger
12/02/2012 11:11:45 PM
- 1651 Views
For the record, I was Catholic for the first 19 years of my life.
12/02/2012 11:35:16 PM
- 1481 Views
That hardly counts: I'm talking about the degree to which one accepts the doctrines & perspective
14/02/2012 12:59:08 PM
- 1515 Views
I meant that Paul refuted reincarnation.
14/02/2012 01:59:06 PM
- 1402 Views
Potato-potahto. You're still the type who'd be set on fire in a more civilized time and place.
17/02/2012 11:51:50 PM
- 1423 Views
You mean when the Church ignored Christ's teachings and burned people? Probably.
18/02/2012 02:17:12 AM
- 1424 Views