Dickens wrote (and wrote, and wrote, and wrote, which made some people despise him, because surely someone with that kind of output, who was earning money, could not possibly write well) journalism, non-fiction, angry letters, friendly letters (really very many letters), short fiction and long fiction.
He completely changed the way fiction was published, and he made a mark on the English language which you should really not scoff at (Ben Zimmer has a blog on the subject here). But central to the enduring appeal of the man are … well, the books.
I charge you, in this year of Dickensian splendour, to pick up one of these books, one you have not read before, and to sit down with it in a soft chair with a cup of tea at your elbow, and read it. You may read more than one (or, if you have already read them all, by all means re-read; or look up the facsimiles of the magazines he edited and wrote for here. But read one.
If you feel overwhelmed by the sheer mass of Dickensiana that will build up around you in the next ten months or so, by all means avoid places like The Guardian's dedicated Dickens page or the Dickens 2012 site. Retreat. To the chair and the tea and the book.
If you have not read Dickens, if you are perhaps avoiding him because you think you know what he is about, pick up a book. Victorian literature has an unfair reputation of being boring, overdone (and perhaps a slightly more fair reputation of occasional sentimentality). On the whole, Dickens is funny, colourful, political and delightful. And not, not ever, always the same.
Any plans for the day?
He completely changed the way fiction was published, and he made a mark on the English language which you should really not scoff at (Ben Zimmer has a blog on the subject here). But central to the enduring appeal of the man are … well, the books.
I charge you, in this year of Dickensian splendour, to pick up one of these books, one you have not read before, and to sit down with it in a soft chair with a cup of tea at your elbow, and read it. You may read more than one (or, if you have already read them all, by all means re-read; or look up the facsimiles of the magazines he edited and wrote for here. But read one.
If you feel overwhelmed by the sheer mass of Dickensiana that will build up around you in the next ten months or so, by all means avoid places like The Guardian's dedicated Dickens page or the Dickens 2012 site. Retreat. To the chair and the tea and the book.
If you have not read Dickens, if you are perhaps avoiding him because you think you know what he is about, pick up a book. Victorian literature has an unfair reputation of being boring, overdone (and perhaps a slightly more fair reputation of occasional sentimentality). On the whole, Dickens is funny, colourful, political and delightful. And not, not ever, always the same.
Any plans for the day?
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
This message last edited by Camilla on 07/02/2012 at 10:14:21 AM
Dickens Bicentennial
07/02/2012 10:02:22 AM
- 1383 Views
Tempting.
07/02/2012 05:38:22 PM
- 756 Views
Re: Tempting.
07/02/2012 05:49:34 PM
- 804 Views
I think I can safely say I'll read at least one "new" Dickens novel this year. Hopefully more.
07/02/2012 07:47:30 PM
- 784 Views
I'm engaged in Jarndyce v. Jarndyce, for all intents and purposes, and cannot spare time.
07/02/2012 09:39:59 PM
- 942 Views
I want to read Bleak House one day. Mainly so I can feel superior about Scots law. *NM*
08/02/2012 08:28:43 PM
- 356 Views
Yeah, sheep aren't considered "persons" for purposes of English law, are they? *NM*
09/02/2012 01:26:46 AM
- 345 Views
Don't forget that the southerly jurisdiction is actually "England and Wales".
09/02/2012 08:21:31 AM
- 824 Views
But you have more of them than Wales does, even if Wales has a higher human to sheep density. *NM*
09/02/2012 04:44:37 PM
- 344 Views
Are you telling me you've actually researched the sheep populations of Scotland and Wales?
09/02/2012 09:45:34 PM
- 736 Views