There's an incredible amount of information that those "begats" give the reader. There are 42 generations, broken into a trinity of 14s. The numerological implication is significant, as 42 signifies the end of tribulation (i.e., the Messiah has come). Furthermore, the names remind the reader of the continuity with the Old Testament, which is important from a traditional Christian standpoint to refute groups that wanted to discard the Old Testament completely. It's why Matthew comes first in the New Testament, actually.
Not only that, but there are further implications. The reader is reminded of the original covenant with Abraham, of the Exodus, the anointing of David and the promise made that the Messiah would arise from his house, the Babylonian exile and the entire spiritual tradition of the Jews.
Furthermore, the whole concept of Hebrew tradition is stood on its head at the very end. The list begins like one of the numerous lists from the Old Testament, then ends by reminding us that Joseph was not Jesus's father. Spiritually, Jesus is the descendant of this house, but physically he is not. He fulfills the promise made, over and over again, to the forebears of Joseph but he comes directly from God.
Also, the unusual circumstances of his birth are legitimized by mention of the four other women prior to Mary who get referenced in that whole list of "begats". Tamar, who posed as a prostitute to have sex with her father-in-law, Rahab, the prostitute of Jericho who hid the Israelite spies before Joshua had the town destroyed, Ruth, who was a Moabite and not even Jewish and whose marriage to Boaz was very unconventional, and Bathsheba, who committed adultery with David while her husband Uriah was fighting in the army (and placed so as to die).
There's a reason why they're mentioned. Anyone reading that whole list and familiar with the stories sees how everything comes together perfectly. All those "begats" are incredibly important in tying the Old Testament to the New.
Not only that, but there are further implications. The reader is reminded of the original covenant with Abraham, of the Exodus, the anointing of David and the promise made that the Messiah would arise from his house, the Babylonian exile and the entire spiritual tradition of the Jews.
Furthermore, the whole concept of Hebrew tradition is stood on its head at the very end. The list begins like one of the numerous lists from the Old Testament, then ends by reminding us that Joseph was not Jesus's father. Spiritually, Jesus is the descendant of this house, but physically he is not. He fulfills the promise made, over and over again, to the forebears of Joseph but he comes directly from God.
Also, the unusual circumstances of his birth are legitimized by mention of the four other women prior to Mary who get referenced in that whole list of "begats". Tamar, who posed as a prostitute to have sex with her father-in-law, Rahab, the prostitute of Jericho who hid the Israelite spies before Joshua had the town destroyed, Ruth, who was a Moabite and not even Jewish and whose marriage to Boaz was very unconventional, and Bathsheba, who committed adultery with David while her husband Uriah was fighting in the army (and placed so as to die).
There's a reason why they're mentioned. Anyone reading that whole list and familiar with the stories sees how everything comes together perfectly. All those "begats" are incredibly important in tying the Old Testament to the New.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
Inspired by The Guardian, which books (classic or otherwise) do you think could be shorter?
30/01/2012 02:10:22 PM
- 1215 Views
The Wheel of Time. *NM*
30/01/2012 02:59:03 PM
- 391 Views
I'd really love someone to do a good job of this.
30/01/2012 04:29:01 PM
- 724 Views
Re: I'd really love someone to do a good job of this.
31/01/2012 02:11:42 AM
- 844 Views
The Fires of Heaven is not the best example for that. It was too early.
31/01/2012 02:31:59 AM
- 738 Views
Re: The Fires of Heaven is not the best example for that. It was too early.
31/01/2012 03:35:36 AM
- 863 Views
I don't think Ivanhoe really needs to be pruned
30/01/2012 03:22:37 PM
- 769 Views
I remember thinking it was long and somewhat difficult when I read it at 13.
30/01/2012 04:31:13 PM
- 766 Views
Seconded, but it's been ages and I'd really need to reread first. *NM*
30/01/2012 10:33:53 PM
- 315 Views
Mansfield Park needs a jolly good rework.
30/01/2012 04:34:54 PM
- 708 Views
In fairness, all Mansfield Park needs to be cut is its heroine...
30/01/2012 10:34:43 PM
- 793 Views
"Could" be shorter doesn't always mean "should" be shorter.
31/01/2012 02:18:44 AM
- 842 Views
Re: "Could" be shorter doesn't always mean "should" be shorter.
31/01/2012 04:00:13 AM
- 802 Views
I think it's terribel thing to do... but may be The Magic Mountain could be a bit shorter... *NM*
31/01/2012 07:28:52 AM
- 344 Views
The Bible. Although I hear it's sort of been abridged before.
31/01/2012 04:46:28 PM
- 735 Views
Why would you cut out Matthew 1?
31/01/2012 05:11:24 PM
- 720 Views
Not all of it.
01/02/2012 04:14:13 PM
- 800 Views
The "begats" shouldn't be bypassed at all.
01/02/2012 08:10:48 PM
- 676 Views
I'd be all for cutting out/reformatting all the bloody NAMESin the old testament
31/01/2012 05:23:28 PM
- 850 Views