Active Users:1191 Time:22/11/2024 07:31:18 PM
I recorded it snoopcester Send a noteboard - 13/01/2012 12:22:15 PM
For some reason I'm opposed to an ending being given to the book but it doesn't bother me if it is done for TV. I think it is because I see the TV version as enough of an original work (as any TV/ film version of a book requires some reworking) that it doesn't bother me while someone rewiting the ending of the book just seems like cheating (trying to claim some of another author's work for your own) or cheapening (dragging them down to your level).

for a continued series it is trickey - some I'm okay with some but not others. Generally I'm okay with series that are just about the character (Sherlock, Bond) rather than the world as well (Hitch hikers, Dune) and if the character is potrayed in a way that seems to me to be true to how the author made them originally. This does extend to versions of the character in other media as well - hence I have no interest in the Ritchie Sherlock Holmes films but really enjoy the TV series.
*MySmiley*

Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."

Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Reply to message
Should unfinished works be given an ending? - Questions prompted by the BBC. - 13/01/2012 12:24:10 AM 1114 Views
In general I would say no... - 13/01/2012 02:14:35 AM 836 Views
I always encounter this in music ... - 13/01/2012 02:48:46 AM 968 Views
Re: In the cases of things like Hitchhikers... - 13/01/2012 02:49:32 AM 729 Views
With regards to Hitch-Hiker's, Adams wanted a sixth book. - 13/01/2012 08:35:43 PM 753 Views
Re: I know! - 16/01/2012 11:21:53 AM 745 Views
I recorded it - 13/01/2012 12:22:15 PM 1065 Views
Don't get me started - 20/01/2012 08:06:58 PM 768 Views

Reply to Message