Active Users:1142 Time:22/11/2024 12:30:50 PM
Not quite Tom Send a noteboard - 12/01/2012 05:31:57 AM
The Aramaic is only relevant for the New Testament and small bits of the Old Testament, but Hebrew Old Testaments don't anachronistically translate those into Hebrew. Even so, it's clear that the original language of the New Testament was Greek. Even with Greek, the Septuagint is helpful to have for historical purposes but not strictly necessary.

As for English, sometimes I think the worst thing to ever happen was the translation of the Bible into English.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
I'm wondering if I own too many Bibles. - 12/01/2012 12:08:16 AM 838 Views
I'm in the same boat - 12/01/2012 12:14:11 AM 689 Views
Just FYI - 12/01/2012 05:34:15 AM 615 Views
I know - 12/01/2012 05:54:00 AM 689 Views
You need a bible that has 5 translations side by side - 12/01/2012 04:16:25 AM 881 Views
Not quite - 12/01/2012 05:31:57 AM 721 Views
That bad of translations? - 12/01/2012 05:55:38 AM 744 Views
May I ask why you have the NIV rather than the NASB? *NM* - 12/01/2012 09:47:55 AM 307 Views
I think it's better. - 12/01/2012 09:11:58 PM 722 Views
Bible geekery. - 12/01/2012 11:55:48 AM 685 Views
Time for me to buy a green sweater. *NM* - 12/01/2012 11:23:14 PM 301 Views
I only have 4 - 12/01/2012 01:58:13 PM 762 Views
I heard the Norwegian one had the controversial "Thou shalt slaughter Leviathan and eat him" passage - 12/01/2012 11:24:50 PM 613 Views
Indeed - 13/01/2012 09:49:06 AM 841 Views
NIV Study Bible is high on my list of Must Haves. - 12/01/2012 08:34:08 PM 685 Views
I'm a little confused - 12/01/2012 11:25:28 PM 640 Views
I shall un-confuse you. - 12/01/2012 11:42:20 PM 617 Views

Reply to Message