Active Users:1093 Time:22/11/2024 07:28:53 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Parody is actually covered by the legal definition of fair use so doesn't break copyright. Rebekah Send a noteboard - 04/01/2012 10:28:08 PM
Parody is a valid form of "creative" work that doesn't usually infringe copyright. If it did, those hideous parodies like Date Movie and Scary Movie wouldn't exist.

The only way they'd have infringed copyright is if they'd used actual scenes from the films they parody - or for books, actual paragraphs from those books.
*MySmiley*

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Reply to message
Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D. Great Lord of Chaos - 03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM 1790 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public. Rebekah - 04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM 923 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works? Aeryn - 04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM 853 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc. Rebekah - 04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM 861 Views
That's not the point, though. Macharius - 05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM 906 Views
???? random thoughts - 05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM 880 Views
Re: ???? Macharius - 05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM 920 Views
That isn't inspiration that wanting to use the popularity of the original to promote your work random thoughts - 05/01/2012 05:04:25 PM 879 Views
not to mention public libraries *NM* random thoughts - 05/01/2012 03:21:04 PM 495 Views
Blame Disney. *NM* Vivien - 04/01/2012 05:48:00 PM 630 Views
I don't get it. Palatine - 04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM 1142 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain. Aeryn - 04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM 948 Views
Parody is actually covered by the legal definition of fair use so doesn't break copyright. Rebekah - 04/01/2012 10:28:08 PM 928 Views
I'm fairly sure the Jane Austen parodies do in fact use actual paragraphs... no? *NM* Legolas - 04/01/2012 10:31:32 PM 495 Views
The zombies one doesn't precisely. It's somewhat modernised. I've not read the others. Rebekah - 04/01/2012 10:32:59 PM 862 Views
Precisely the point. Vivien - 04/01/2012 10:45:01 PM 863 Views
Yes, they take tons of text from actual books. Contrast this with Ms. Rowling's reaction. *NM* Aeryn - 05/01/2012 07:01:46 PM 406 Views
If there's zero chance of needing a lawyer at some point, it's way more likely to actually happen. Vivien - 04/01/2012 10:43:23 PM 951 Views
Regarding quotes or poem lines, they ask permission for those. Legolas - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 806 Views
Answering you specifically Palatine - 05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM 881 Views
But that doesn't make sense. Aeryn - 05/01/2012 07:18:08 PM 1041 Views
Here's the gist of it. Palatine - 06/01/2012 04:18:29 PM 880 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway) Vivien - 04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM 910 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. Palatine - 05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM 825 Views
Copyrights stifle creativity. Aeryn - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 913 Views
Re: Copyrights stifle creativity. Palatine - 06/01/2012 04:39:24 PM 1310 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. Vivien - 06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM 843 Views
Why. Palatine - 06/01/2012 05:05:20 PM 1456 Views
That is a very confusing article. Legolas - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM 976 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different Larry - 04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM 902 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies? random thoughts - 05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM 853 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM* Aeryn - 05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM 388 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics... ranagrande - 05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM 1009 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM* Vivien - 06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM 423 Views
Except of course they haven't copyrighted them... DomA - 06/01/2012 01:53:01 AM 832 Views
nice theory but you can make a Little Mermaid movie if you want random thoughts - 06/01/2012 02:48:47 PM 888 Views
OK why is that even a point of argument? random thoughts - 06/01/2012 02:42:47 PM 855 Views
No incentive to make great new works if they can just keep re-releasing Lion King in 3D *NM* Aeryn - 06/01/2012 09:45:38 PM 470 Views
I'm a lot older than your five year old, but I'm not sure I disagree Tangled is better. Legolas - 06/01/2012 11:12:32 PM 908 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* Larry - 05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM 1002 Views
Do you really want corporations to be immortal? Vivien - 06/01/2012 12:50:11 AM 907 Views
In a sense, aren't they already? Larry - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM 995 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* DomA - 06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM 902 Views
It's a thorny issue and I largely agree with you Larry - 06/01/2012 02:50:24 AM 928 Views
Huh... apparently, Mickey Mouse is already Public Domain anyway ranagrande - 06/01/2012 07:30:36 AM 1087 Views
Can you back that up? Vivien - 06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM 1027 Views
Re: Can you back that up? DomA - 06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM 818 Views
Artist/Singers used to *always* be on tour in order to make a living. Vivien - 06/01/2012 09:34:44 PM 1109 Views
Re: the piracy issues ranagrande - 06/01/2012 06:30:46 AM 1017 Views
Book piracy Vivien - 06/01/2012 05:21:40 PM 1120 Views
corporations have always had rights random thoughts - 06/01/2012 04:08:12 PM 869 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes