The ruins have more personality than most of the characters! For that matter, I know more about Aragorn's genealogy than I do Aragorn as a person.
And that's a problem.
It isn't for me. I think that the way Tolkien wrote it, these characters fit perfectly into the history that was prepared for them. It isn't so much a story about the people. It's about showing that there ARE people involved in each step of the epic. Real people, and love, bonds, mistakes, etc. So, anyway. I don't care if others don't agree, but I have no issue with the way he wrote this all as a whole.
J.R.R. Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings
12/12/2011 04:25:26 AM
- 1657 Views
Thank you for reposting these.
12/12/2011 04:36:06 PM
- 943 Views
Interestingly enough
13/12/2011 12:10:08 AM
- 789 Views
Re: Interestingly enough
13/12/2011 12:42:10 PM
- 770 Views
I think
13/12/2011 01:21:41 PM
- 835 Views
Probably, yes, but still no excuse for allowing the worldbuilding to overpower the story being told.
13/12/2011 04:00:23 PM
- 775 Views
We'll have to disagree.
14/12/2011 12:46:23 AM
- 792 Views
Re-reads after a long period of time can lead to surprising results
13/12/2011 01:02:23 AM
- 893 Views
The speech patterns were intentional, but not meant to be "archaic".
14/12/2011 04:02:55 AM
- 849 Views
Oh, I know that
14/12/2011 08:25:53 AM
- 841 Views
I love the dialogue in LOTR. a more modern voice would be terrible *NM*
15/12/2011 06:09:18 PM
- 375 Views