Active Users:1141 Time:22/11/2024 09:27:44 AM
No, because the movies are very contemporary and relevant, thus he will remain so for quite a while. Dan Send a noteboard - 12/12/2011 03:14:53 AM
For better or for worse.








I think we are at least 2 generations removed from Tolkien. I can't tell you how irritating it is to pick up a book and see a blurb about how the author is a modern Tolkien. I'm sorry, but I didn't grow up on Tolkien. I grew up on Jordan, Weis and Hickman, Salvatore, even Martin. There is a whole new slew of great authors, like Abercrombie, Sanderson, Butcher, Rothfuss, Erikson. Tolkien was the pretty much the first to set the stage for modern fantasy. That's it. Stop treating the guy like he's still relevant. Because, personally, I found Lord of the Rings to be almost unreadable. It makes for a good sleep aid, though.

Face it people, it's time to start comparing these new authors to Jordan, maybe even Martin. Tolkien is like 60+ years ago. Do authors still get compared to Homer? The state of fantasy right now is light years past what Tolkien came up with. I partially blame Peter Jackson, of course. What he did with that material was freaking brilliant. It made Lord of the Rings relevant again. So, of course, all credit goes back to Tolkien now. But if I ever became a writer, I would credit Jordan, et al. and never mention Tolkien. That time is done. It's over. Move on. Jordan and Martin are the standards now.

</rant>
Reply to message
Aren't the Tolkien comparisons getting a little...old? - 09/12/2011 09:51:39 PM 2848 Views
The comparison bothers me, but not because Tolkien isn't relevant. - 09/12/2011 10:05:22 PM 1716 Views
I agree with this. - 09/12/2011 10:21:34 PM 1745 Views
Re: I agree with this. - 10/12/2011 07:09:33 PM 1680 Views
Exactly *NM* - 12/12/2011 12:09:19 PM 855 Views
Only when shit works are being compared to him - 09/12/2011 10:22:26 PM 1607 Views
Larry, - 10/12/2011 01:13:18 AM 1624 Views
Snide dismissal that will be passed off as for his own entertainment. - 10/12/2011 04:55:43 AM 1537 Views
We get a lot of that around here. *NM* - 10/12/2011 05:18:01 AM 639 Views
makes me wonder... - 10/12/2011 04:37:33 PM 1523 Views
Re: makes me wonder... - 11/12/2011 03:03:15 AM 1488 Views
Well-deserved condescension. - 11/12/2011 03:54:27 AM 1655 Views
You're sure about that? - 11/12/2011 04:20:26 AM 1882 Views
Re: You're sure about that? - 11/12/2011 05:25:08 AM 1608 Views
Re: You're sure about that? - 11/12/2011 06:03:02 AM 1473 Views
i think you shouldn't judge a whole world's school programs on your school - 11/12/2011 06:42:30 AM 1526 Views
Yeah, I'm limited in my knowledge, lol - 11/12/2011 08:03:26 AM 1537 Views
My school was...not great. - 11/12/2011 04:02:36 PM 1562 Views
I'm 24. - 11/12/2011 03:49:06 PM 1480 Views
If you're arguing that children should be able to read genre fiction, fine. - 11/12/2011 08:52:27 PM 1404 Views
Well, I suppose it depends on the type of genre being read - 11/12/2011 09:36:16 PM 1640 Views
How often do you hear the challenging writers mentioned at this site? - 12/12/2011 02:03:05 PM 1376 Views
Only when you, me, and a couple others write reviews - 12/12/2011 04:21:14 PM 1780 Views
Oh, it was the same as it always is - 12/12/2011 05:23:56 PM 1490 Views
True - 12/12/2011 06:29:10 PM 1576 Views
One note - 13/12/2011 12:17:48 AM 1582 Views
Perhaps - 13/12/2011 12:49:34 AM 1516 Views
*Sighs* Such is the plight of those shining few intelects... - 23/12/2011 01:15:47 AM 1564 Views
Much of the actual "Classics", that is, Greek and Latin originals, kids would eat up. - 12/12/2011 03:13:03 AM 1390 Views
Try teaching Apuleius in schools... *NM* - 12/12/2011 04:12:49 AM 759 Views
Plato is exciting, brutal and scandalous? - 12/12/2011 09:59:13 PM 1455 Views
You're upfront and honest about it; he isn't. The difference matters to me. *NM* - 11/12/2011 05:18:42 AM 808 Views
Uhh...uh... - 11/12/2011 05:34:23 AM 1489 Views
this is a bit off topic, but out of curiousity... - 11/12/2011 06:28:35 AM 1599 Views
There are no special snowflakes, are there? - 11/12/2011 09:39:21 PM 1403 Views
There are many way of widening one's horizons and broadening one's mind. - 11/12/2011 10:08:24 PM 1165 Views
I said as much in my comment - 11/12/2011 10:20:03 PM 1435 Views
What I don't like- - 12/12/2011 04:28:55 AM 1519 Views
Why don't you name something, then? - 12/12/2011 04:40:29 AM 1468 Views
Sure. - 13/12/2011 07:30:56 AM 1298 Views
Mentioning Ender's Game pretty much shot your argument in the foot. - 13/12/2011 02:02:59 PM 1411 Views
You dismiss the entire video game medium because many games lack value. - 13/12/2011 03:59:11 PM 1557 Views
You're like the McDonald's paid advocate trying to say Big Macs are actually healthy. - 13/12/2011 05:46:37 PM 1363 Views
McDonalds food is inherently unhealthy. - 13/12/2011 06:02:18 PM 1501 Views
For the sake of argument ... - 13/12/2011 04:09:51 PM 1405 Views
Stephenson is not literature, that's for damn sure. - 13/12/2011 05:49:24 PM 1355 Views
Thank you, The Voice of Lews Therin. *NM* - 16/12/2011 05:14:42 AM 824 Views
I'll leave it up to others to define as they wish against their self-conceptions of me - 10/12/2011 10:52:54 AM 1519 Views
that's alright. I really have no desire to stroke your twit-ego. *NM* - 10/12/2011 04:36:56 PM 616 Views
Considering the firestorm I appear to have touched off, that may be best. - 12/12/2011 12:57:49 PM 1500 Views
I know, John - 12/12/2011 04:27:04 PM 1393 Views
Re: I know, John - 12/12/2011 05:06:26 PM 1453 Views
As I've said in the past, I'd be scared if anyone agreed with me anywhere approaching 100% - 12/12/2011 06:33:52 PM 1390 Views
Re: As I've said in the past, I'd be scared if anyone agreed with me anywhere approaching 100% - 12/12/2011 07:13:37 PM 1464 Views
Same guy - 12/12/2011 07:26:13 PM 1509 Views
Ha! Excellent point. *NM* - 11/12/2011 03:44:52 AM 743 Views
I have to agree. - 09/12/2011 10:54:06 PM 1509 Views
They're there for marketing - 10/12/2011 12:20:17 AM 1488 Views
Most of those comparisons are like that anyway - 10/12/2011 05:32:45 PM 1623 Views
Maybe if so much of the genre weren't crap derivative works it wouldn't be so common. *NM* - 11/12/2011 03:44:24 AM 739 Views
To be fair, a lot of it isn't. - 11/12/2011 04:06:07 AM 1439 Views
I suspect that if it really isn't derivative it's not being compared to Tolkien in the first place. - 11/12/2011 04:18:57 AM 1374 Views
That's true. - 11/12/2011 11:08:01 AM 1363 Views
Maybe they mean something else by using his name. - 11/12/2011 03:50:15 AM 1446 Views
When they don't work, yes. - 11/12/2011 03:18:44 PM 1449 Views
The Tolkien fanaticism gets old. And yes, for me it is unreadable. - 11/12/2011 11:37:53 PM 1436 Views
No, because the movies are very contemporary and relevant, thus he will remain so for quite a while. - 12/12/2011 03:14:53 AM 1493 Views
Yes *NM* - 22/12/2011 07:08:38 PM 860 Views

Reply to Message