Active Users:1188 Time:23/11/2024 04:26:45 AM
Re: Emma Bovary has no depth, she is a ninny! RomaVenkat Send a noteboard - 09/09/2011 05:46:45 AM
I am flabbergasted.

Seriously, they are all, except for the two angels, who have potential, pretty straightforward. Good Omens is brilliant writing that is dedicated to plot, theme, and fun. But it is rather light reading if you want, like, subtlety or some such other thing.


I'll take Aziraphale over Emma Bovary any day.


But some people prefer ninnies so long as they can understand them in their boring entirety.
Roh
Reply to message
Which Pratchett book should I try first? - 08/09/2011 01:56:11 AM 880 Views
Hm. I don't know if I'd call Pratchett "cerebral." He's more... British. - 08/09/2011 03:26:53 AM 640 Views
Re: I'd recommend Guards! Guards! - 08/09/2011 04:28:18 AM 787 Views
I agree with Guards! Guards! - 08/09/2011 01:59:56 PM 646 Views
I started with Going Postal as well - 08/09/2011 02:28:37 PM 661 Views
Re: Hogfather was my first Death-Sto Helit book. It is so awesome. *NM* - 08/09/2011 03:36:08 PM 288 Views
Re: I started with Going Postal as well - 08/09/2011 03:43:33 PM 719 Views
Yeah, that's probably best *NM* - 08/09/2011 05:26:57 PM 266 Views
Yeah, that's a really good idea. - 08/09/2011 06:42:22 PM 692 Views
I've read them in order of publish and I dig that way. - 08/09/2011 04:37:24 PM 695 Views
Re: I don't like the later books quite as much.. - 08/09/2011 05:28:15 PM 682 Views
I did too! It's tough to recommend that to others, though - 08/09/2011 05:28:15 PM 606 Views
Yeah, I wouldn't recommend people start with Color of Magic - 08/09/2011 06:43:20 PM 694 Views
How could you be not impressed by Good Omens? - 08/09/2011 06:35:37 PM 589 Views
Re: Not much depth of character. - 09/09/2011 03:15:55 AM 602 Views
Debt of character, schmept of character - 09/09/2011 05:15:05 AM 681 Views
Re: Emma Bovary has no depth, she is a ninny! - 09/09/2011 05:46:45 AM 659 Views
Yes depth. That is how it is spelled - 09/09/2011 05:47:58 AM 671 Views
Hey! - 09/09/2011 11:21:24 PM 613 Views

Reply to Message