that is, if I suddenly receive a book I want to read more than the one I was reading... I may do that. This is only a problem when I have a big pile of books, and feel like reading other things every second day. It generally just means the easier reads are read first, though.
"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world" - Calvin.
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were?
23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM
- 1814 Views
I used to be a book-whore
23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM
- 1397 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore
23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM
- 1439 Views
Hmm
23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM
- 1408 Views
Re: Hmm
24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM
- 1384 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time
23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM
- 1340 Views
Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation.
23/09/2009 12:44:45 PM
- 1406 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM
- 1284 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM
- 1347 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now
23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM
- 1367 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now.
23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM
- 1428 Views
It does sound really good
23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM
- 1263 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour.
23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
- 1330 Views

Highly monogamous
23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM
- 1320 Views
This might be a Male thing
23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM
- 1360 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing
23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM
- 1395 Views
best place for it.
23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM
- 1383 Views
Re: best place for it.
23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM
- 1217 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM
- 1416 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM
- 1334 Views
For the most part. Not always, but then it usually ends up with me divorcing the first book. *NM*
23/09/2009 07:17:32 PM
- 772 Views
Shocking. I hope you give it some sort of financial support, at least? *NM*
23/09/2009 07:53:11 PM
- 731 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few.
23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM
- 1234 Views
RT stole my post title.
23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM
- 1437 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy.
23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM
- 1354 Views
Totally slutty
24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM
- 1403 Views
Re: Totally slutty
24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM
- 1427 Views
24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
- 1242 Views

Re:
24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
- 1201 Views

It's a time-honored thing, though!
24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM
- 1240 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though!
24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM
- 1411 Views
That does not exist for me
24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
- 1339 Views

Re: That does not exist for me
24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
- 1215 Views

I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one
24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM
- 1302 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe
24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM
- 1368 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no?
24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM
- 1477 Views
where?
24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM
- 1251 Views
Here
24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM
- 1379 Views
Usually I read one at a time.
24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM
- 1339 Views