Hey guys. Not really a regular poster on the books board, but I came across an <a href="http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2011/08/spoilers-dont-spoil-anything.ars">article you might like.</a>
Basically it's a claim that having a story "spoiled" doesn't actually decrease someone's enjoyment of it (and in fact may do the opposite). There's not a lot of data to back this up (one experiment) but it seems to make sense. Personally, I've always enjoyed reading plot summaries before starting a book, so I'd more or less agree with what this is saying.
Anyway, check it out, and my apologies if this is something that's been discussed to death.
Basically it's a claim that having a story "spoiled" doesn't actually decrease someone's enjoyment of it (and in fact may do the opposite). There's not a lot of data to back this up (one experiment) but it seems to make sense. Personally, I've always enjoyed reading plot summaries before starting a book, so I'd more or less agree with what this is saying.
Anyway, check it out, and my apologies if this is something that's been discussed to death.
It'd be interesting to see this study replicated in some way with people who self-identify (like we're seeing in the replies here) as people who either like, don't like, or don't mind spoilers in general.
I think there's a selection bias in using undergraduates to support this point. They probably appreciate the timesaving element and somebody telling them what the important bits are before they begin. Among other issues.
I also think there's a huge difference in time investment (and, to my way of thinking, that will directly impact this enjoyment measurement) when you talk about short stories vs. a novel, a series of novels, or a TV series.
But it's definitely an interesting article (as is the rebuttal Nate posted). I think another reason people don't like spoilers on the internets is oftentimes they've actively worked to avoid spoilers (and delayed the gratification of reading/viewing something they want to so as to avoid the possibility of having something spoiled) and then are frustrated to have spoilers appear in unlikely places, making their effort feel wasted. So it's not all about enjoying the story less, but other psychological elements at play.
If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
Interesting article: "Spoilers don't spoil anything."
11/08/2011 08:33:42 PM
- 1952 Views
It's probably one of those things that works "in general"
11/08/2011 08:43:03 PM
- 1099 Views
I sometimes find spoilers can ADD tension (a *MAJOR* aDwD spoiler contained within!!!)
12/08/2011 03:02:18 AM
- 1012 Views
Here's a rebuttal.
11/08/2011 09:02:06 PM
- 1261 Views
That rebuttal is about as strong as the original article (not very ).
11/08/2011 10:15:36 PM
- 1252 Views
I think in many cases there certainly is an "intended" way to enjoy a book...
11/08/2011 11:17:30 PM
- 999 Views
Tor.com has a vested interest in us not getting spoilers
12/08/2011 03:24:20 AM
- 926 Views
It really depends on the story, and of course on the reader.
11/08/2011 11:03:01 PM
- 1062 Views
I pretty much agree with your opinion here. It depends on the spoiler and the book.
12/08/2011 12:45:02 PM
- 954 Views
Interesting.
12/08/2011 04:38:19 PM
- 932 Views
It depends on what you want to get out of a story
19/08/2011 12:16:42 AM
- 941 Views