This disagreement post went up on the Tor.com blogs today. I lean more toward its side, as it draws distinctions between different types of spoilers. When the whole story is about the surprise, I don't see the point in reading it when I know what the surprise is. For example I found the Mistborn trilogy quite enjoyable in part because I had to try to unravel the secret each book presented before it was unveiled, and didn't know the answer ahead of time.
Warder to starry_nite
Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Interesting article: "Spoilers don't spoil anything."
- 11/08/2011 08:33:42 PM
1952 Views
It's probably one of those things that works "in general"
- 11/08/2011 08:43:03 PM
1099 Views
I sometimes find spoilers can ADD tension (a *MAJOR* aDwD spoiler contained within!!!)
- 12/08/2011 03:02:18 AM
1013 Views
Here's a rebuttal.
- 11/08/2011 09:02:06 PM
1263 Views
That rebuttal is about as strong as the original article (not very 
).
- 11/08/2011 10:15:36 PM
1252 Views
).
- 11/08/2011 10:15:36 PM
1252 Views
I think in many cases there certainly is an "intended" way to enjoy a book...
- 11/08/2011 11:17:30 PM
1000 Views
Tor.com has a vested interest in us not getting spoilers
- 12/08/2011 03:24:20 AM
927 Views
It really depends on the story, and of course on the reader.
- 11/08/2011 11:03:01 PM
1062 Views
I pretty much agree with your opinion here. It depends on the spoiler and the book.
- 12/08/2011 12:45:02 PM
954 Views
It depends on what you want to get out of a story
- 19/08/2011 12:16:42 AM
941 Views