I mean, sometimes the places they put some books just does not make sense. The Baroque Cycle in the fantasy and science fiction section? Whitley Streiber's (autobiographical, if he can be believed) "Communion" in the SF section when it clearly says all over the book that it is not fiction?
Librarians know nothing.
Librarians know nothing.
Technically speaking, anyways. I think labelling is always subjective, but try telling the librarians that
Death to the Regressives of the GOP and the TeaParty. No mercy for Conservatives. Burn them all at the stake for the hateful satanists they are.
This message last edited by imlad on 04/08/2011 at 01:53:48 AM
anti science mindset in fantasy?
31/07/2011 07:32:16 PM
- 1075 Views
Just wanna say
31/07/2011 10:52:17 PM
- 942 Views
Uhh...
31/07/2011 11:31:29 PM
- 964 Views
Re: Uhh...
01/08/2011 02:00:56 AM
- 1092 Views
Shields stop physical things..
01/08/2011 05:16:28 AM
- 977 Views
if the books mention that specifically, fine then
02/08/2011 12:14:47 AM
- 921 Views
Again, read the books...
02/08/2011 07:15:27 AM
- 1001 Views
Anti-science
02/08/2011 01:36:04 PM
- 1024 Views
That doesn't make it anti-science...
02/08/2011 02:56:58 PM
- 982 Views
Re: That doesn't make it anti-science...
02/08/2011 09:56:41 PM
- 983 Views
Because...
03/08/2011 04:21:43 AM
- 1127 Views
Thanks for proving again that books are better than movies... *NM*
01/08/2011 12:17:26 AM
- 333 Views
Well it sounds to me like you're not thinking about the term "science" correctly.
03/08/2011 05:29:42 AM
- 774 Views
personally, I've always seen SF as a sub genre of Fantasy
03/08/2011 07:02:02 AM
- 968 Views
Other way around, actually
03/08/2011 05:29:07 PM
- 887 Views
the librarians Know Nothing
04/08/2011 01:24:33 AM
- 1039 Views