If Ned had not tried to tell about Joffery not being the true heir in what is a crazy and unhonorable form of government anyway that no one that is honorable should support, if he had not tried to warn Cersi that he was going to tell the king, if he had not become the hand of the king in the first place, he would still be alive and raising his children. All of the above were things he did because of honor. One of the major themes of the song of ice and fire is that honor can get you killed when you are fighting people who don't play by the same rules. Remember the author is an atheist who doesn't have much use for what many of us would call honor (caring for the poor and other crazy altruistic things). Obviously that kind of personal philosophy will effect his writing.
Much like a flat tax versus a progressive tax though we have had this argument 1 x 10(9) times now. (is there a way to do superscripts here?) and we are not going to change people's opinions. It grows boring...
Much like a flat tax versus a progressive tax though we have had this argument 1 x 10(9) times now. (is there a way to do superscripts here?) and we are not going to change people's opinions. It grows boring...
Ned Stark's downfall wasn't his sense of honor
25/07/2011 01:32:08 PM
- 1013 Views
Isn't protecting children a honorable obligation? *NM*
25/07/2011 02:33:16 PM
- 302 Views
Yes - protecting children (innocents) was the honourable thing for him to do. *NM*
25/07/2011 06:54:14 PM
- 338 Views
There are other ways to do that, and kids don't excuse law-breaking
26/07/2011 03:14:29 AM
- 680 Views
I disagree
25/07/2011 07:51:27 PM
- 880 Views
Doing right is more important than accumulating power
26/07/2011 04:09:57 AM
- 883 Views
This again...sigh
31/07/2011 06:29:54 PM
- 640 Views
Trusting people he had every reason to not trust was his downfall
31/07/2011 07:34:24 PM
- 704 Views