Active Users:251 Time:19/04/2025 03:45:31 AM
I don't quite agree Tom Send a noteboard - 21/09/2009 01:22:45 AM
Being the pedantic person I am, I'd argue that there is no more suspense in such a situation than there would otherwise be, though when the bigger army wins there would be a surprise.

However, even if the bigger army were to win, it would have to lead to some other event happening that would make the victory hollow (like in Sanderson's Mistborn, where the rebel army is crushed but it leads to other events). After all, if the big army wins, and wins totally, with no other event to mitigate the victory, there's no more story - it's just a static situation.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Ever notice how in fantasy books the smaller army always wins? - 20/09/2009 01:01:18 PM 1295 Views
It's an essential plot device - 20/09/2009 04:41:04 PM 941 Views
Yeah but... - 20/09/2009 07:38:36 PM 917 Views
I don't quite agree - 21/09/2009 01:22:45 AM 867 Views
I'm sitting here trying to think if I've read any books like that... - 21/09/2009 01:40:08 AM 794 Views
Fail. - 21/09/2009 04:43:24 AM 1003 Views
Agreed. - 21/09/2009 04:59:39 AM 890 Views
Well there are plenty of authors not in their right minds - 21/09/2009 05:49:22 PM 814 Views
True. - 21/09/2009 06:50:43 PM 893 Views
Re: Ever notice how in fantasy books the smaller army always wins? - 20/09/2009 08:45:48 PM 1058 Views
That, and... - 20/09/2009 09:08:48 PM 903 Views
Nineteen Eighty-Four, baby! - 20/09/2009 10:37:05 PM 837 Views
That is not even fantasy... - 21/09/2009 12:00:48 AM 844 Views
IT ISN'T?! *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:42:16 AM 355 Views
Yeah, didn't your dad tell you about the double ungood days of the 80s? *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:52:46 AM 343 Views
Doubleplusungood. - 25/09/2009 02:09:27 AM 814 Views
I agree. 1984 is not SF-F. *NM* - 25/09/2009 12:36:46 AM 350 Views
Who knew? ¯\(°O)/¯ *NM* - 25/09/2009 02:07:19 AM 338 Views
I... don't know what those symbols mean. *NM* - 26/09/2009 07:04:13 AM 365 Views
Wheel of Time? - 20/09/2009 11:52:36 PM 828 Views
I have not found that to be always true - 21/09/2009 12:52:00 AM 791 Views
The smaller army doesn't always win - 21/09/2009 02:47:07 AM 819 Views
Because you don't have to root for the huge army that's supposed to win. - 21/09/2009 04:38:22 AM 867 Views
everybody loves an under dog *NM* - 21/09/2009 03:51:12 PM 355 Views
Pratchett makes much of this. *NM* - 21/09/2009 04:11:04 PM 375 Views
Exactly what I was going to say - 27/09/2009 02:55:02 PM 916 Views

Reply to Message