Active Users:857 Time:02/04/2025 11:00:42 AM
I think... Rebekah Send a noteboard - 27/04/2011 05:46:38 PM
Those souls, such as they were, were rather crippled. No one grew beyond childhood. The character traits--both good and bad--present in childhood became only moreso in adulthood. There was no real character development. Kathy remains as observant and passive as a gargoyle. Tommy remains charming and clueless. Ruth reamins a manipulate little witch. In fact, I found Ruth's character so repulsively written, her redeeming qualities so non-existent, that I had a difficult time with Kathy's blind devotion to her. Even Ruth's final moment of confessing her sins to Kathy and Tommy is viewed by Kathy as some kind of triumph on Ruth's part.

While I could see and even understand how the students' simple acceptance of their cruel fates made sense, the acceptance of Ruth's toxic personality is mind-boggling. I was waiting for something, so moment in which Kathy grows a spine and tells Ruth off. For Tommy to blink and say, "Why I am with this girl?" To hear Kathy tell it, even Tommy and Kathy's long-awaited affair seems to be done 'because it's what Ruth wanted for' them.

Were they genetically engineered to be emotionally crippled? More than the anti-climatic reveal from Miss Emily about the real purpose of all those art projects (which I saw coming from a mile away)--the whole idea of 'being in love' to get a deferral made little sense to me, when you're talking about characters with the Emotional Range of Teaspoon.

... that Ishiguro did that perfectly.

To me, it seems that the teachers at Hailsham were so keen on proving that the clones were indeed human that they forgot to teach them some of the basic personality and social skills we learn from our parents - those things that prove us as humans, moreso than Art.
*MySmiley*

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Reply to message
Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro - 04/04/2011 09:36:13 PM 8321 Views
Re: Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro - 05/04/2011 01:15:04 AM 1690 Views
Re: Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro - 05/04/2011 09:50:42 AM 1605 Views
I was very impressed with it - 05/04/2011 02:17:10 PM 1641 Views
Yes - 05/04/2011 03:47:07 PM 1827 Views
That book is one I think about more than any I have read in a long while. - 05/04/2011 11:01:58 PM 1633 Views
I agree - 05/04/2011 11:15:22 PM 1670 Views
I am very pleased you liked this. - 06/04/2011 11:22:40 PM 1697 Views
Re: I am very pleased you liked this. - 06/04/2011 11:49:41 PM 1670 Views
Another thing (on my hesitating) - 07/04/2011 10:08:21 AM 1618 Views
You really should've known Ishiguro is worth more than that, though. - 07/04/2011 08:02:10 PM 1679 Views
I should have. And in the end I did. That is why I picked it up. - 07/04/2011 08:14:16 PM 1593 Views
I thought it was outstanding - 08/04/2011 08:18:05 PM 1619 Views
Re: I thought it was outstanding - 12/04/2011 07:50:00 AM 1619 Views
Re: Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro - 11/04/2011 03:15:54 AM 1678 Views
Re: Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro - 12/04/2011 07:48:35 AM 1643 Views
thinks of puns based on the title - 24/04/2011 11:26:48 PM 1696 Views
I had the same reaction to Ruth - 27/04/2011 08:55:06 AM 1617 Views
Re: I had the same reaction to Ruth - 27/04/2011 04:18:01 PM 1721 Views
I think... - 27/04/2011 05:46:38 PM 1978 Views
Very true. *NM* - 28/04/2011 10:00:21 AM 802 Views

Reply to Message