Ever notice how in fantasy books the smaller army always wins?
Murtach74 Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 01:01:18 PM
It happens in scifi too. I've noticed that the "good guys" always have the smaller army and somehow miraculously they win against the huge evil army. Not to mention that there are not that many battles that the "good guys" lose anyway. It does make it more dramatic but it is getting kind of over used. Here are some examples.
Star Wars
Eragon(like four times or something!)
Lord of the Rings(sort of)
First battle in the Temeraire series(forgot what it was called)
etc.
There are so many examples. Pleasae tell me some books where this doesn't happen. And also how you feel about constantly reading smallerV. Bigger and smaller winning.
Star Wars
Eragon(like four times or something!)
Lord of the Rings(sort of)
First battle in the Temeraire series(forgot what it was called)
etc.
There are so many examples. Pleasae tell me some books where this doesn't happen. And also how you feel about constantly reading smallerV. Bigger and smaller winning.
People are dying in Africa......
And what are we doing?
Chatting about books...
This holiday season find a charity you trust and donate...
Or let them die...
And what are we doing?
Chatting about books...
This holiday season find a charity you trust and donate...
Or let them die...
Ever notice how in fantasy books the smaller army always wins?
- 20/09/2009 01:01:18 PM
1296 Views
Re: Ever notice how in fantasy books the smaller army always wins?
- 20/09/2009 01:17:00 PM
906 Views
Well, usually the bigger army are the invaders. Defence tends to have an edge
- 20/09/2009 04:38:45 PM
944 Views
It's an essential plot device
- 20/09/2009 04:41:04 PM
941 Views
Yeah but...
- 20/09/2009 07:38:36 PM
918 Views
I don't quite agree
- 21/09/2009 01:22:45 AM
867 Views
I'm sitting here trying to think if I've read any books like that...
- 21/09/2009 01:40:08 AM
795 Views
Fail. 
- 21/09/2009 04:43:24 AM
1004 Views
- 21/09/2009 04:43:24 AM
1004 Views
Hrmm...guess Miéville failed to follow the script then *NM*
- 20/09/2009 07:48:29 PM
328 Views
and a lot of others. But there's a rumour somewhere that it's not the size that matters... *NM*
- 20/09/2009 07:53:41 PM
324 Views
It's still a valid point, even if one author doesn't "follow the script." *NM*
- 25/09/2009 12:34:48 AM
377 Views
Re: Ever notice how in fantasy books the smaller army always wins?
- 20/09/2009 08:45:48 PM
1058 Views
That, and...
- 20/09/2009 09:08:48 PM
903 Views
Nineteen Eighty-Four, baby!
- 20/09/2009 10:37:05 PM
838 Views
That is not even fantasy...
- 21/09/2009 12:00:48 AM
844 Views
IT ISN'T?! *NM*
- 21/09/2009 01:42:16 AM
355 Views
Yeah, didn't your dad tell you about the double ungood days of the 80s? *NM*
- 21/09/2009 01:52:46 AM
343 Views
Doubleplusungood.
- 25/09/2009 02:09:27 AM
814 Views
Oops, sorry. Probably a thoughtcrime to put a space in. Rebellious waste of... pixels? Space? *NM*
- 25/09/2009 04:26:14 PM
369 Views
I agree. 1984 is not SF-F. *NM*
- 25/09/2009 12:36:46 AM
350 Views
All books should have a point, IMO. Otherwise, what's the point in reading them.
- 25/09/2009 04:32:43 PM
919 Views
Nineteen Eighty-Four is unquestionably Science Fiction. *NM*
- 26/09/2009 04:12:47 AM
399 Views
No, it's not. ScyFy does not lay claim to anything and everything that takes place...
- 26/09/2009 07:05:59 AM
807 Views
It's a novel which heavily relies upon futuristic technology. How is it not Science Fiction? *NM*
- 28/09/2009 01:43:23 AM
341 Views
I read it years ago and I don't remember any futuristic technology except...
- 28/09/2009 04:16:21 AM
902 Views
I would say that if a story uses that sort of thing, it has a science fiction element.
- 28/09/2009 05:20:39 AM
693 Views
Because you don't have to root for the huge army that's supposed to win.
- 21/09/2009 04:38:22 AM
867 Views
Pratchett makes much of this. *NM*
- 21/09/2009 04:11:04 PM
375 Views
"You can take our lives, but you can never take our freedom!" "...wrong!" *NM*
- 21/09/2009 11:02:25 PM
316 Views