I got tired of the descriptions of everyone's "bushes" and I don't want to see anyone's "glistening manhood". I don't want everything spelled out for me. However, I am not asking Mr Martin to change. I realize that is just my personal preference and that most people have no problem with it. I am a big girl and can skim over those parts if I really want to. The sex itself is relevant to the story. I personally don't need that level of detail to get the picture. It is just a Teresa quirk.
Tash
I am already feeling the phrase "glistening manhood" is overused.
Insert theme music here.
The current GRRM shitstorm: some weirdo on the Game of Thrones series.
15/04/2011 05:46:21 PM
- 2990 Views
Horrbile review, if you can call it that.
15/04/2011 06:48:45 PM
- 1085 Views
The NYT review was internally inconsistent and largely incoherent.
15/04/2011 07:34:57 PM
- 1529 Views
My god, that was painful
15/04/2011 11:02:11 PM
- 986 Views
The original reviewer appears not only to be an outdated snob but an idiot
16/04/2011 11:51:29 PM
- 873 Views
Wow. Very opinionated. It would be offensive if I cared about what she thought but I don't.
18/04/2011 02:08:52 AM
- 863 Views
That's an interesting question.
18/04/2011 04:33:48 AM
- 819 Views
It would depend on how much detail they go into.
18/04/2011 10:01:58 AM
- 986 Views
That is a good point.
18/04/2011 01:28:47 PM
- 776 Views
It mostly irks me that women will read this and think, "I shouldn't bother with that show."
18/04/2011 07:07:13 AM
- 917 Views