Re: Need help from Erikson Fans - The Malazan Book of the Fallen Info
Macharius Send a noteboard - 14/03/2011 01:03:12 PM
I found the first one extremely hard to get into. Erikson pushed the 'in media res' approach really far for a series opener, and in this first one in particular I thought he didn't master yet so well the "converging" structure that would become his trademark later (very slow build ups, followed by a sudden awesome final rush, sometimes lasting for the full last third of a book etc. ) From book 2 onward this is excellently done, in GoTM I lost interest before it started happening, and when it did I just didn't really care anymore. It got better on re read, as GoTM is one of those books that don't make much sense early on but you discover later in the series were full of things that escaped you).
It may help to know that GotM was originally written as a screenplay before being adapted into a novel. To me, that helped explain the structure a great deal.
Need help from Erikson Fans - The Malazan Book of the Fallen Info
14/03/2011 01:11:23 AM
- 1004 Views
Does this mean you plan to skip a few?
14/03/2011 01:28:23 AM
- 573 Views
Definitely planning to read them all, but I would like some overall context.....
14/03/2011 03:57:14 AM
- 721 Views
Re: Need help from Erikson Fans - The Malazan Book of the Fallen Info
14/03/2011 03:26:39 AM
- 722 Views
Re: Need help from Erikson Fans - The Malazan Book of the Fallen Info
14/03/2011 01:03:12 PM
- 613 Views
Re: Need help from Erikson Fans - The Malazan Book of the Fallen Info
14/03/2011 03:44:50 PM
- 619 Views
Well...
14/03/2011 06:49:08 AM
- 595 Views
I disagree with the characterizations you provide for Bonehunters and DoD.
14/03/2011 01:07:15 PM
- 565 Views
Yeah, I'm with John here... DoD ranks among the better books of the second half of the series. *NM*
14/03/2011 09:57:04 PM
- 277 Views