I haven't read the original, though, so I don't know how more or less terrible it is.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
I love it when authors criticise their own work many years after the original release.
- 14/02/2011 05:34:38 PM
927 Views
Re: I love it when authors criticise their own work many years after the original release.
- 14/02/2011 05:49:06 PM
648 Views
Re: I love it when authors criticise their own work many years after the original release.
- 14/02/2011 05:59:20 PM
613 Views
Rowling has talked about having problems with book 1, but
- 14/02/2011 06:56:10 PM
994 Views
she could make changes and release special editions. Fans love that.
- 15/02/2011 01:44:16 AM
603 Views
Except that the later books generally compensate for it...
- 15/02/2011 01:54:58 AM
658 Views
There were surprises in later books that should have at least been hinted at earlier. *NM*
- 15/02/2011 10:49:49 PM
257 Views
Didn't Stephen King do a revised version of The Gunslinger? *NM*
- 15/02/2011 11:29:42 PM
218 Views
I have it. It is terrible.
- 16/02/2011 03:43:16 AM
592 Views
Much of the older King work is better than his newer stuff. Same with George Lucas.
- 04/03/2011 04:04:17 AM
527 Views
Re: I want JKR's thoughts on her last book. The first is much better. 
*NM*
- 22/02/2011 04:58:21 AM
248 Views
*NM*
- 22/02/2011 04:58:21 AM
248 Views